Every play StatIQ logged at a price before the game started, graded in the open afterwards. Wins and losses, never deleted — loading the ledger…
…
loading
StatIQ Sports — honest player-prop projections with a public record
StatIQPregame to final — all in one place
DetailAdds the projection, the calibrated chance, the band and the history.
The record
Every play StatIQ logged at a price before the game started, graded in the open afterwards. Wins and losses, never deleted. This page exists to be checked, not believed.
Everything below counts MLB only, previous model (Jul 12 to Jul 27), in units. Change any of the three and every number on the page changes with it.
354−325
MLB · Previous model · Jul 12 to Jul 27
679 graded plays
52.1%
Hit rate354 of 679 decided
−13.90u
Net unitsflat 1u a play
−2.05%
Return per playnet u ÷ 679 plays
0 · 87 void
Still openlogged, not yet graded
− MLB is behind Over 679 graded MLB plays in this era we are down −13.90u. That is the first number on the page and it stays the first number on the page. The other two windows are not hidden: the current model is 437−313 at +83.77u, and the all-time official record is 791−638 at +69.87u. Records are never blended across sports — different models, different markets, different start dates; one combined figure would be a number we invented.
Before the numbers
How to read this page
One sport at a time. You are looking at MLB. Each sport is a different model on different markets and their records are never added together, not even to make a bigger number.
One era at a time, but all three are on screen. The headline counts the era in the switch above. The other two are in the table below it, and the first two add up to the third.
A rate needs a sample. Below 20 decided plays we show the raw won–lost and a dash instead of a percentage. That rule is applied to good samples and bad ones identically.
Colour is never the only signal. Every gain or loss carries an explicit + or − and a word. The page reads correctly in greyscale.
Any number that is not the headline says so. Every subset on this page states its own n, how that n relates to the headline’s n, and what happened to the rows it excludes. If you find one that does not, that is a bug and it is the worst kind we can ship.
Voids are not wins and not losses. A player who never played settles at 0 and stays on the record labelled as such. Nothing is deleted, ever.
The cutoffs, in full. The official MLB record starts 2026-07-12; the current model era starts 2026-07-28. Anything before the first date is kept and shown but not counted — it was graded under rules we have since disowned. The excluded stretch is itemised at the foot of the era table, including when it helped us.
Return per play is net units divided by graded plays at a flat 1 unit, on the price we locked, before any bonus, boost or fee. It describes plays already graded. It is not a forecast and it is not annualised.
Eras
Three windows, all on screen at once
A model cutover starts a new era. The previous era stays published and unedited — a scoreboard you are allowed to reset is not a scoreboard. So rather than hide two of the three numbers behind the one that flatters us, all three sit in one table, and the top two add up to the bottom one. Pick a row to make it the headline.
Window
W−L
Graded
Hit rate
Return / play
Net units
Current modelsince Jul 28 · the model selecting plays today
Before the official recordplays from Jul 10 to Jul 11 · not counted anywhere above
11−2
13
—
—
+17.55u
The two eras add up to the record computed from 1429 rows
✓This identity holds:437 + 354 = 791 wins
✓
The curve
Cumulative units, both eras, one axis
The whole official record on one line, with the model cutover drawn as a rule rather than as a fresh start. The shaded span is the era the headline above counts. The best and worst points are both labelled: a chart that only marks its peak is an advertisement.
Cumulative units across 29 graded days, Jul 12 to Aug 12, ending at +69.87u. One point per game day, evenly spaced — days with no games are not stretched out, so the horizontal axis is order, not calendar time. The line is the whole official record, both eras: the era the headline counts is shaded, and the cutover is drawn as a rule rather than as a restart, because restarting the chart at every recalibration is how a losing record disappears one cutover at a time. Every point here is also a row in the table below.
Day by day
Every day, and every pick inside it
One row per game day: won–lost, that day’s units, and the running total after it. Open a day to see the individual plays — the side we took, the price we took it at, how long before the game we took it, what we projected, and what actually happened. Collapsing a day never hides its result: the totals stay on the header either way.
13 game days · 679 graded plays · 87 void · 0 still open. The day totals add to −13.90u, the same figure as the headline.
Jul 27Mon24−25−2.74urunning −13.90u11 voidprevious model
Otto Lopez›Philadelphia Phillies vs Miami Marlins · total bases · priced 16h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+171 at ProphetXproj 1.9 → 5+2.30%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.71u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+171 at ProphetX
Splits
The same plays, cut four ways
Each split is an exhaustive partition of the plays in the current scope: the rows add to the headline’s W–L and to its units, and the table prints the total so you can see that they do. Rates are withheld below n=20 — and on a small sample almost every cell is withheld, which is the honest answer rather than a table of noise.
Time between the price we locked and the scheduled first pitch or tip-off. Every band should be positive by construction — a play logged after the start would be a scandal, so the check is in the arithmetic at the foot of the page rather than in a promise here.
How early we bet
Plays
W−L
Hit rate
Return / play
Net units
Contribution
more than 12 hours before
516
255−261
49.4%
−6.37%
−32.86u
4–12 hours before
157
95−62
60.5%
+9.60%
+15.07u
no timestamp on the row
6
4−2
—
—
+3.89u
Where the price came from
The same plays, at two definitions of “takeable”
Where the price came from — the same 679 settled tracked plays (bets we made, not measurement-only locks), previous model, read two ways
As logged-2.05%-13.90u354–325 · n=679every play, at the price we locked
Neither of these is “the real one.” The left column is the append-only record exactly as we logged it. The right column is the same plays restricted to prices takeable at a state-licensed US sportsbook or a CFTC-designated contract market (Novig, ProphetX) — what the record looks like if you can only bet where we would send you. They reconcile exactly: 679 = 411 + 268 excluded, worth +3.23u. Nothing is hidden and nothing is counted twice.
Sweepstakes47 plays-8.35u · -17.76%priced at a sweepstakes book — promotional currency, not a cash price
Pick'em61 plays+4.59u · +7.52%priced at a pick'em app — an entry leg, not a single bet
Offshore62 plays-4.55u · -7.33%priced offshore — no US licence, no consumer recourse
No book recorded98 plays+11.53u · +11.77%no book recorded on the play — we cannot prove where it was takeable
Going forward the play gate reads the US-regulated price, so we never tell you something is worth betting only at a venue you may not be able to use. The offshore number is still captured and still shown next to it, so this table keeps measuring exactly what that choice costs us — or saves us. Excluded plays are never deleted: they stay in the record, in the list below, and in the left column.
Subsets
Two numbers that are not the record
Both of these count a different set of rows from the headline, and that is exactly how a number stops reconciling and starts looking like a contradiction. So each one states its own n, how that n relates to the headline’s n, and what happened to the rows it leaves out.
At the book vs at Kalshi 221 of 679 plays
At the book
−11.53u
−5.22% per play
At Kalshi, fee included
−27.14u
−12.28% per play
Same plays, same results112−109 either way
What differsonly the price each venue paid
Kalshi fee applied0.07 × p × (1−p) per contract, rounded up to the cent
and it reconciles to the headline
✓This identity holds:221 comparable + 458 with no fillable Kalshi price = 679 graded plays
✓This identity holds:−11.53u + −2.37u = −13.90u, the headline net
A price comparison on the 221 plays where Kalshi listed our line at a fillable pre-game price (5¢–95¢; the tails are stale or untradeable and a “win” at 1¢ pays 49× and fakes the whole number). The other 458 plays ran −2.37u and count in the headline only. Kalshi charges no sportsbook vig but we line-shop across many books, so the book beating the exchange is a finding, not a bug.
Closing line value, on the tracked plays 613 of 679 plays
+0.82%
average, in probability points, against where our side closed · beat the close on 386 of 613
why 613 and not 679
✓
Nothing settles at “never happened”
Voids, pushes and the plays still open
Rows that could not win or lose money. They are not in the W–L and not in the return, because no stake was ever at risk on them — and they are not deleted, because “we took this line” is the claim, and the claim stands whether or not the player played. Every count here is scoped to the era selected above, the same as the headline.
Voids — nobody could win or lose 87 rows
87 settled at 0.00u
MLB · previous model
did not play52
the game was postponed — it was never played35
✓This identity holds:679 graded + 87 void + 0 open = 766 rows we logged in this scope
The voids are in that total and not in the headline’s 679. Counting a scratch as a win would be a lie; deleting it would be a different one.
Where we cannot name the reason precisely we say “no action” rather than guess “did not play”. A postponed game is not a player sitting out, and a label that is only probably true has no business on a record page.
Pushes and open plays
Pushes (landed exactly on the number)0
Logged, game not finished0
Measurement-only picks (never in this record)208
There are no pushes in this scope — every line we took was a half-number, so nothing could land exactly on it. The row is printed anyway: a zero you can see is worth more than a category that quietly does not exist.
The 208 measurement-only picks are model-qualified numbers we take a price on and grade purely to measure ourselves faster. They have their own wins and losses and none of them count here, good or bad. They are the reason the closing-line-value sample on the audit page is bigger than this record.
The promise
Append-only, and here is what that costs us
“Append-only” is easy to write and hard to prove. The proof is that the worst things that have happened to us are still on this page, at full size, in the same type as the good ones.
Logged before the game, every time
✓ 673 / 673
plays whose price was locked strictly before the scheduled start
6 of the 679 graded plays in this scope carry no lock timestamp, so they cannot be checked this way and are excluded from the fraction above rather than counted as passing.
earliestgame startstightest 5h 56m
Earliest1d 5h before
Median14h 10m before
Tightest5h 56m before
This is the claim the whole record rests on, so it is measured rather than asserted: for every play we hold the moment we locked the price and the scheduled start, and the gap is checked on every single one. The tightest was 5h 56m.
The worst of it, at full size
Worst dayTue, Jul 21 · 24−33
…that day cost−11.72u
Longest losing run11 plays in a row
Deepest drawdown from a peak−35.42u
Best daySun, Jul 19 · 38−32
…that day made+4.98u
Don’t take our word for it
Check the arithmetic
Every identity this page relies on, re-derived from the raw rows. If a subset near a headline cannot be reconciled with the headline, that is the worst bug this product can ship — so these are printed rather than promised, and a failing one renders as a failure on the page instead of quietly disappearing.
✗ 1 of 14 checks FAILED · re-derived from 766 rows in this scope
✓Passed:the eras partition the record — 437−313 + 354−325 = 791−638
✗FAILED:era units add up — +83.77u + −13.90u = +69.87u
✓Passed:era counts add up — 750 + 679 = 1429 graded plays
✓Passed:the market split partitions all 679 plays and −13.90u exactly
✓Passed:the side split partitions all 679 plays and −13.90u exactly
✓Passed:the book split partitions all 679 plays and −13.90u exactly
✓Passed:the how early we bet split partitions all 679 plays and −13.90u exactly
✓Passed:the at-Kalshi subset plus the plays it excludes equals the headline, in count AND in units
✓Passed:every graded play has exactly one CLV status — 613 counted, 6 we never priced it, 44 the book moved the line, 16 no closing quote
✓Passed:
Past results are a record of what happened, not a forecast. No ROI claim is made anywhere on this page: a return figure here describes plays already graded, and the sample is far short of the several thousand it would take to separate skill from variance. Browse the same record by player →
This identity holds:
313 + 325 = 638 losses
✓This identity holds:750 + 679 = 1429 graded plays
✗THIS IDENTITY DOES NOT HOLD:+83.77u + −13.90u = +69.87u
The pre-record row is deliberately not in that sum. It is shown because hiding it would be the cherry-pick, and it is excluded because it was graded under a method we have disowned.
The official MLB record begins 2026-07-12. Before that we have 11−2 over 13 plays worth +17.55u, and we do not count them — they were graded before watch-then-lock existed, under selection rules we no longer use. Note the direction. That excluded stretch was ahead: dropping it takes +17.55u away from us. A cutoff that only ever deletes losses is cherry-picking; this one deletes a win, which is the only way you can tell it is a real rule.
Locked before the game
16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+136
Where our side closed+148
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.9 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed39.9%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+1.71u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.30%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.42%
…of which: waiting paid+5.47%
…of which: market drift−2.05%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.47% + −2.05% = +3.42%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.30% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game42¢
With Kalshi’s fee44¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Ezequiel Duran›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 12h 32m before the gameOver 1.5+168 at Bovadaproj 1.89 → 5−0.55%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.68u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+168 at Bovada
Locked before the game12h 32m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+150
Where our side closed+172
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.89 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed39.4%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+1.68u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.55%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.55%
…of which: waiting paid+2.69%
…of which: market drift−3.24%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game37¢
With Kalshi’s fee39¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Nick Gonzales›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 20h 37m before the gameOver 1.5+146proj 1.78 → 2+1.11%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.46u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+146 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game20h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+146
Where our side closed+138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.78 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.2%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.46u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.11%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.37%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.37%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.37% = +1.37%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.11% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game41¢
With Kalshi’s fee43¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Nelson Velazquez›Chicago Cubs vs St. Louis Cardinals · hits · priced 12h 56m before the gameUnder 0.5+145 at BetMGMproj 0.35 → 0+2.58%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.45u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+145 at BetMGM
Locked before the game12h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+130
Where our side closed+130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.35 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed43.7%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.45u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.58%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.66%
…of which: waiting paid+2.66%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.66% + 0.00% = +2.66%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.58% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game98¢
With Kalshi’s fee99¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Miguel Vargas›New York Yankees vs Chicago White Sox · total bases · priced 15h 37m before the gameOver 1.5+126 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.75 → 2−3.52%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.26u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+126 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game15h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+110
Where our side closed+150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.75 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.8%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.26u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.52%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−4.25%
…of which: waiting paid+3.37%
…of which: market drift−7.62%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.37% + −7.62% = −4.25%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.52% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game42¢
With Kalshi’s fee44¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Ernie Clement›Toronto Blue Jays vs Washington Nationals · total bases · priced 18h 43m before the gameOver 1.5+117 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.7 → 2+2.94%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.17u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+117 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game18h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-110
Where our side closed+104
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.7 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed49.1%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.17u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.94%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.94%
…of which: waiting paid+6.30%
…of which: market drift−3.36%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game47¢
With Kalshi’s fee49¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Jakob Marsee›Philadelphia Phillies vs Miami Marlins · total bases · priced 14h 38m before the gameOver 0.5+109 at Fliffproj 0.79 → 3+0.20%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.09u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+109 at Fliff
Locked before the game14h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed+105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.79 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed49.1%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.09u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.20%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.93%
…of which: waiting paid+7.71%
…of which: market drift−6.78%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.71% + −6.78% = +0.93%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.20% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Davis Schneider›Toronto Blue Jays vs Washington Nationals · hits · priced 18h 43m before the gameUnder 0.5+100 at DraftKingsproj 0.36 → 0+3.86%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+100 at DraftKings
Locked before the game18h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-111
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.36 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed50.6%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.86%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.49%
…of which: waiting paid+2.61%
…of which: market drift+0.88%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.61% + +0.88% = +3.49%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.86% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Eli White›Atlanta Braves vs New York Mets · hits · priced 13h 7m before the gameUnder 0.5+100proj 0.42 → 0not measurableno closing quote✓ Won+1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+100 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.42 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed50.2%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
LaMonte Wade Jr.›Houston Astros vs Los Angeles Angels · hits · priced 17h 35m before the gameUnder 0.5+100proj 0.45 → 0−1.81%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+100 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-110
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.45 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed50.4%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.81%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.38%
…of which: waiting paid+2.38%
…of which: market drift−4.76%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.38% + −4.76% = −2.38%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.81% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game50¢
With Kalshi’s fee52¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Miguel Amaya›Chicago Cubs vs St. Louis Cardinals · hits · priced 12h 56m before the gameOver 0.5-117 at Novigproj 0.76 → 2+1.44%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.85u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-117 at Novig
Locked before the game12h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-124
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.76 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.9%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.85u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.44%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.44%
…of which: waiting paid+8.35%
…of which: market drift−6.91%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game56¢
With Kalshi’s fee58¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Josh Smith›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · hits · priced 16h 32m before the gameOver 0.5-120 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.75 → 1+1.85%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.83u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-120 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 32m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.75 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.1%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.83u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.85%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.90%
…of which: waiting paid+5.45%
…of which: market drift−2.55%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.45% + −2.55% = +2.90%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.85% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game57¢
With Kalshi’s fee59¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
James Outman›Baltimore Orioles vs Detroit Tigers · hits · priced 16h 37m before the gameUnder 0.5-123 at Fliffproj 0.4 → 0+1.32%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.81u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-123 at Fliff
Locked before the game16h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.4 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.3%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.81u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.32%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.36%
…of which: waiting paid+7.11%
…of which: market drift−5.74%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.11% + −5.74% = +1.36%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.32% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game59¢
With Kalshi’s fee61¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Munetaka Murakami›New York Yankees vs Chicago White Sox · hits · priced 19h 37m before the gameOver 0.5-129 at ProphetXproj 0.86 → 1−0.46%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.78u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-129 at ProphetX
Locked before the game19h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-129
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.86 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.4%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.78u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.46%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.19%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.19%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +0.19% = +0.19%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.46% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game58¢
With Kalshi’s fee60¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Jake Bauers›Milwaukee Brewers vs San Francisco Giants · total bases · priced 15h 42m before the gameOver 0.5-130proj 1.33 → 1+0.40%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.77u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-130 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 42m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-155 on 1
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.33 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.0%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.77u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.40%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.93%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Nasim Nunez›Toronto Blue Jays vs Washington Nationals · hits · priced 20h 43m before the gameOver 0.5-134 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.86 → 2−1.44%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.75u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-134 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game20h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.86 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.4%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.75u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.44%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.74%
…of which: waiting paid+5.70%
…of which: market drift−6.44%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.70% + −6.44% = −0.74%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.44% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game98¢
With Kalshi’s fee99¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Jo Adell›Houston Astros vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 17h 35m before the gameOver 0.5-135proj 1.7 → 2not measurableno closing quote✓ Won+0.74u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-135 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-149 on 1
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.7 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.1%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.74u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Vaughn Grissom›Houston Astros vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 21h 35m before the gameOver 0.5-149 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.61 → 6+3.29%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-149 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game21h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-180
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.61 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.1%
Actual6 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.29%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.45%
…of which: waiting paid+2.42%
…of which: market drift+2.02%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.42% + +2.02% = +4.45%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.29% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Kyle Schwarber›Philadelphia Phillies vs Miami Marlins · hits · priced 12h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-160 at ProphetXproj 0.94 → 1+0.09%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.63u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-160 at ProphetX
Locked before the game12h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-194
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.8%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.63u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.09%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.73%
…of which: waiting paid+4.45%
…of which: market drift−3.72%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.45% + −3.72% = +0.73%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.09% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game65¢
With Kalshi’s fee67¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Xavier Edwards›Philadelphia Phillies vs Miami Marlins · total bases · priced 12h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-165proj 1.23 → 2+0.52%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game12h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165 on 1
Where our side closed-175
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.23 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.7%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.52%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.37%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Chase Meidroth›New York Yankees vs Chicago White Sox · total bases · priced 15h 37m before the gameOver 0.5-190proj 1.49 → 2−0.91%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.53u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-190 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-215 on 1
Where our side closed-180
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.49 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed65.9%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.53u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.91%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.23%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Josh Naylor›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · hits · priced 14h 32m before the gameOver 0.5-200 at DraftKingsproj 1.08 → 1+0.45%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-200 at DraftKings
Locked before the game14h 32m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-215
Where our side closed-210
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.08 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed67.0%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.45%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.08%
…of which: waiting paid+1.59%
…of which: market drift−0.51%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.59% + −0.51% = +1.08%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.45% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game66¢
With Kalshi’s fee68¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Masataka Yoshida›Boston Red Sox vs Athletics · hits · priced 15h 37m before the gameUnder 1.5-200proj 0.86 → 1+0.79%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-200 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-240
Where our side closed-200
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.86 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed67.1%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.79%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+3.92%
…of which: market drift−3.92%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.92% + −3.92% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.79% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game68¢
With Kalshi’s fee70¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Jake Mangum›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Pittsburgh Pirates · hits · priced 12h 37m before the gameUnder 1.5-210 at BetOnlineproj 1.06 → 1−0.37%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.48u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-210 at BetOnline
Locked before the game12h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-263
Where our side closed-210
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.06 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed68.2%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.48u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.37%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+4.71%
…of which: market drift−4.71%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.71% + −4.71% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.37% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game69¢
With Kalshi’s fee71¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Ali Sanchez›New York Yankees vs Chicago White Sox · hits · priced 17h 37m before the gameUnder 0.5+110 at DraftKingsproj 0.42 → 1−1.81%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+110 at DraftKings
Locked before the game17h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-110
Where our side closed+118
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.42 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed50.6%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.81%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.75%
…of which: waiting paid+4.76%
…of which: market drift−6.51%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.76% + −6.51% = −1.75%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.81% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game2¢
With Kalshi’s fee3¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Amed Rosario›New York Yankees vs Chicago White Sox · total bases · priced 19h 37m before the gameUnder 1.5-138 at ProphetXproj 0.86 → 2+3.41%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-138 at ProphetX
Locked before the game19h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-138
Where our side closed-159
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.86 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.0%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.41%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+3.41%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.41%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Bo Bichette›Atlanta Braves vs New York Mets · total bases · priced 17h 7m before the gameUnder 1.5-134 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.19 → 3−0.34%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-134 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game17h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-145
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.19 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed59.2%
Actual3 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.34%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.18%
…of which: waiting paid+1.92%
…of which: market drift−1.74%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.92% + −1.74% = +0.18%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.34% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game59¢
With Kalshi’s fee61¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Brice Turang›Milwaukee Brewers vs San Francisco Giants · total bases · priced 13h 42m before the gameOver 1.5+140 at DraftKingsproj 1.88 → 0−0.98%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+140 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 42m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.88 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.98%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.67%
…of which: waiting paid+4.84%
…of which: market drift−6.51%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.84% + −6.51% = −1.67%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.98% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game42¢
With Kalshi’s fee44¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Casey Schmitt›Milwaukee Brewers vs San Francisco Giants · total bases · priced 13h 42m before the gameOver 1.5+172 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.81 → 1+2.56%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+172 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game13h 42m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+145
Where our side closed+150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.81 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed39.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.56%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.24%
…of which: waiting paid+4.05%
…of which: market drift−0.82%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.05% + −0.82% = +3.24%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.56% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game40¢
With Kalshi’s fee42¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
CJ Abrams›Toronto Blue Jays vs Washington Nationals · total bases · priced 22h 43m before the gameOver 1.5-110 at Hard Rock Betproj 3.22 → 0+4.50%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took-110 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game22h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-110
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection3.22 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed52.6%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.50%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.11%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.11%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.11% = +1.11%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +4.50% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game50¢
With Kalshi’s fee52¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Colby Thomas›Boston Red Sox vs Athletics · hits · priced 21h 37m before the gameUnder 0.5+113 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.4 → 1+1.72%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+113 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game21h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.4 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.5%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.72%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.67%
…of which: waiting paid+4.27%
…of which: market drift−3.60%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.27% + −3.60% = +0.67%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.72% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game45¢
With Kalshi’s fee47¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Cooper Pratt›Milwaukee Brewers vs San Francisco Giants · total bases · priced 17h 42m before the gameOver 0.5-190proj 1.71 → 0not measurableno closing quote✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-190 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 42m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+171 on 1
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.71 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed65.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Curtis Mead›Boston Red Sox vs Athletics · hits · priced 11h 5m before the gameOver 0.5-230 at ProphetXproj 1.13 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-230 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-230
Where our side closed+200 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.13 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed69.9%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game67¢
With Kalshi’s fee69¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Dillon Dingler›Baltimore Orioles vs Detroit Tigers · total bases · priced 20h 37m before the gameOver 1.5+140 at ProphetXproj 1.9 → 1+3.09%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+140 at ProphetX
Locked before the game20h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+140
Where our side closed+125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.9 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.4%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.09%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.78%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.78%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +2.78% = +2.78%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.09% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game43¢
With Kalshi’s fee45¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Drake Baldwin›Atlanta Braves vs New York Mets · total bases · priced 19h 7m before the gameOver 1.5+126 at Bovadaproj 2.23 → 1−0.43%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+126 at Bovada
Locked before the game19h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.23 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.7%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.43%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.77%
…of which: waiting paid+2.26%
…of which: market drift−3.03%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.26% + −3.03% = −0.77%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.43% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game43¢
With Kalshi’s fee45¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Esmerlyn Valdez›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 12h 37m before the gameOver 1.5+140 at Bovadaproj 2.54 → 0+1.36%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+140 at Bovada
Locked before the game12h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+140
Where our side closed+140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.54 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.36%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + 0.00% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.36% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game42¢
With Kalshi’s fee44¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Gabriel Moreno›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 20h 37m before the gameOver 1.5+125proj 1.91 → 0−0.08%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+125 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game20h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+125
Where our side closed+127
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.91 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.08%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.39%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.39%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −0.39% = −0.39%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.08% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game46¢
With Kalshi’s fee48¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Joe Mack›Philadelphia Phillies vs Miami Marlins · total bases · priced 14h 38m before the gameOver 0.5+109 at Fliffproj 1.4 → 0+3.36%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+109 at Fliff
Locked before the game14h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed-103
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.4 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.36%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.89%
…of which: waiting paid+6.70%
…of which: market drift−3.81%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.70% + −3.81% = +2.89%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.36% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Leody Taveras›Baltimore Orioles vs Detroit Tigers · hits · priced 16h 37m before the gameUnder 0.5+157proj 0.48 → 1−0.10%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+157 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+154
Where our side closed+153
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.48 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed41.0%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.10%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.62%
…of which: waiting paid+0.46%
…of which: market drift+0.16%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.46% + +0.16% = +0.62%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.10% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game36¢
With Kalshi’s fee38¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Luke Raley›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 16h 32m before the gameOver 0.5-115 at Fliffproj 1.11 → 0+3.74%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-115 at Fliff
Locked before the game16h 32m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.11 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.74%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.03%
…of which: waiting paid+3.03%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.03% + 0.00% = +3.03%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.74% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Masyn Winn›Chicago Cubs vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 14h 43m before the gameUnder 1.5-165proj 0.82 → 2+0.10%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.82 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.7%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.10%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + 0.00% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.10% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game64¢
With Kalshi’s fee66¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Michael Harris II›Atlanta Braves vs New York Mets · total bases · priced 17h 7m before the gameOver 1.5+130 at Caesarsproj 2.05 → 1+0.89%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+130 at Caesars
Locked before the game17h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+112
Where our side closed+125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.05 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.0%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.89%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.97%
…of which: waiting paid+3.69%
…of which: market drift−2.73%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.69% + −2.73% = +0.97%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.89% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game45¢
With Kalshi’s fee47¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Nico Hoerner›Chicago Cubs vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 12h 56m before the gameUnder 1.5-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.34 → 3−0.85%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.34 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed59.5%
Actual3 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.85%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid−1.89%
…of which: market drift+1.89%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (−1.89% + +1.89% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.85% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game59¢
With Kalshi’s fee61¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Pete Crow-Armstrong›Chicago Cubs vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 14h 43m before the gameOver 1.5+115proj 2.3 → 0+1.49%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+115 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+106
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.3 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.6%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.49%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.03%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.03%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +2.03% = +2.03%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.49% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game49¢
With Kalshi’s fee51¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Rafael Devers›Milwaukee Brewers vs San Francisco Giants · total bases · priced 19h 42m before the gameOver 1.5+158 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.9 → 0+1.66%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+158 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game19h 42m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+140
Where our side closed+145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.9 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed38.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.66%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.06%
…of which: waiting paid+2.91%
…of which: market drift−0.85%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.91% + −0.85% = +2.06%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.66% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game38¢
With Kalshi’s fee40¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Tim Tawa›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 14h 37m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.63 → 0−0.37%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game14h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
Where our side closed-123
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.63 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.37%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.36%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−1.36%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −1.36% = −1.36%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.37% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Tommy White›Boston Red Sox vs Athletics · hits · priced 23h 37m before the gameOver 0.5-164proj 1.25 → 0+2.79%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-164 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game23h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-175
Where our side closed-190
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.25 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.0%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.79%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.40%
…of which: waiting paid+1.52%
…of which: market drift+1.88%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.52% + +1.88% = +3.40%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.79% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game64¢
With Kalshi’s fee66¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Wyatt Langford›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 14h 32m before the gameOver 1.5+136 at Caesarsproj 2.45 → 0+0.47%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+136 at Caesars
Locked before the game14h 32m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+127
Where our side closed+136
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.45 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.47%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+1.68%
…of which: market drift−1.68%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.68% + −1.68% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.47% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game42¢
With Kalshi’s fee44¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Yordan Alvarez›Houston Astros vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 17h 35m before the gameOver 1.5-102proj 2.45 → 0+0.84%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took-102 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-103
Where our side closed+102
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.45 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.84%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.99%
…of which: waiting paid+0.24%
…of which: market drift−1.23%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.24% + −1.23% = −0.99%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.84% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game49¢
With Kalshi’s fee51¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Brady House›Toronto Blue Jays vs Washington Nationals · hits · priced 20h 43m before the gameOver 0.5-164 at DraftKingsproj 0.91−0.32%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-164 at DraftKings
Locked before the game20h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-219
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.91 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.7%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.32%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.58%
…of which: waiting paid+6.53%
…of which: market drift−7.11%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.53% + −7.11% = −0.58%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.32% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Brayan Rocchio›Cleveland Guardians vs Cincinnati Reds · total bases · priced 15h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-156proj 1.67not measurablethe book moved the linePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-156 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+178 on 1
Where our side closed+170 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.67 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.8%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Cam Smith›Houston Astros vs Los Angeles Angels · hits · priced 17h 35m before the gameUnder 0.5+137proj 0.43+3.60%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+137 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+130
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.43 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed43.8%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.60%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.26%
…of which: waiting paid+1.28%
…of which: market drift+1.98%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.28% + +1.98% = +3.26%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.60% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Carson Benge›Atlanta Braves vs New York Mets · hits · priced 21h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-125 at DraftKingsproj 0.99+6.57%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-125 at DraftKings
Locked before the game21h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-164
Where our side closed-164
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.99 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.1%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+6.57%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+6.57%
…of which: waiting paid+6.57%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Elly De La Cruz›Cleveland Guardians vs Cincinnati Reds · total bases · priced 21h 7m before the gameOver 1.5+100proj 2.32+1.24%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+100 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game21h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed-108
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.32 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.0%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.24%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.92%
…of which: waiting paid+1.22%
…of which: market drift+0.70%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.22% + +0.70% = +1.92%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.24% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game97¢
With Kalshi’s fee98¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Kerry Carpenter›Baltimore Orioles vs Detroit Tigers · hits · priced 16h 37m before the gameUnder 0.5+125proj 0.4−0.14%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+125 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+108
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.4 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed44.9%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.14%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.01%
…of which: waiting paid+3.63%
…of which: market drift−2.62%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.63% + −2.62% = +1.01%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.14% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Kyle Manzardo›Cleveland Guardians vs Cincinnati Reds · hits · priced 19h 7m before the gameUnder 0.5-122proj 0.5−3.61%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-122 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game19h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
Where our side closed-109
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.5 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.1%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.61%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.80%
…of which: waiting paid+2.49%
…of which: market drift−5.29%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.49% + −5.29% = −2.80%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.61% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game46¢
With Kalshi’s fee48¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Nick Kurtz›Boston Red Sox vs Athletics · total bases · priced 12h before the gameUnder 1.5-128 at ProphetXproj 1.32+0.39%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-128 at ProphetX
Locked before the game12h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-159
Where our side closed-145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.32 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed57.9%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.39%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.04%
…of which: waiting paid+5.25%
…of which: market drift−2.21%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.25% + −2.21% = +3.04%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.39% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game80¢
With Kalshi’s fee82¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Petey Halpin›Cleveland Guardians vs Cincinnati Reds · total bases · priced 15h 7m before the gameOver 0.5+112proj 0.96not measurableno closing quotePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+112 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.96 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.3%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Sam Huff›Baltimore Orioles vs Detroit Tigers · hits · priced 16h 37m before the gameUnder 0.5-115 at DraftKingsproj 0.29not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-115 at DraftKings
Locked before the game16h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-126
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.29 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.6%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Steven Kwan›Cleveland Guardians vs Cincinnati Reds · total bases · priced 17h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-156proj 1.38not measurablethe book moved the linePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-156 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-156 on 1
Where our side closed+180 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.38 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.3%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Jul 26Sun33−36−9.73urunning −11.16u6 voidprevious model
Chandler Simpson›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameOver 1.5+185 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.65 → 2+0.27%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.85u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+185 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-196 on 0.5
Where our side closed+180
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.65 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed36.1%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.85u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.27%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.63%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game33¢
With Kalshi’s fee35¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Brady House›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · total bases · priced 11h 32m before the gameOver 1.5+156 at ProphetXproj 1.55 → 4−0.47%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.56u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+156 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 32m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+156
Where our side closed+150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.55 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed39.9%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.56u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.47%
Ben Rice›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 19h 18m before the gameOver 1.5+145 at Bovadaproj 2.42 → 6not measurableno closing quote✓ Won+1.45u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+145 at Bovada
Locked before the game19h 18m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.42 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.8%
Actual6 total bases
Settled+1.45u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Exchange cross-check
Jackson Merrill›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · total bases · priced 11h 37m before the gameOver 1.5+140 at ProphetXproj 1.83 → 5−0.34%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.40u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+140 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+140
Where our side closed+142
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.83 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.5%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+1.40u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.34%
Pete Crow-Armstrong›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 15h 33m before the gameOver 1.5+105 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 2.25 → 3+0.93%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.05u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+105 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game15h 33m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+105
Where our side closed+106
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.25 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed49.3%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.05u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Cole Carrigg›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 12h 7m before the gameOver 0.5+100 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.46 → 4+2.11%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+100 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
Where our side closed-114
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.46 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed52.4%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.11%
Max Schuemann›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · hits · priced 19h 18m before the gameUnder 0.5-102 at BetOnlineproj 0.43 → 0−0.66%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.98u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-102 at BetOnline
Locked before the game19h 18m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-102
Where our side closed+105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.43 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.7%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.98u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.66%
Carlos Narvaez›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · hits · priced 13h 33m before the gameUnder 0.5-104 at DraftKingsproj 0.5 → 0+0.57%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.96u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-104 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 33m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.5 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.9%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.96u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.57%
Kyle Manzardo›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · hits · priced 12h 13m before the gameUnder 0.5-109 at BetOnlineproj 0.5 → 0−0.69%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.92u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-109 at BetOnline
Locked before the game12h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-109
Where our side closed-103
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.5 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed53.1%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.92u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.69%
Dalton Rushing›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · hits · priced 13h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-110 at ProphetXproj 0.52 → 1not measurableno closing quote✓ Won+0.91u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-110 at ProphetX
Locked before the game13h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-144
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.52 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed53.9%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.91u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Exchange cross-check
Gabriel Rincones Jr.›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 17h 17m before the gameOver 0.5-115 at BetOnlineproj 0.99 → 1−1.74%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.87u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-115 at BetOnline
Locked before the game17h 17m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
Where our side closed-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.99 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.87u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Hunter Goodman›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-120 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 2.08 → 1+1.53%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.83u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-120 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-155
Where our side closed-120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.08 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.4%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.83u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Sam Huff›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · hits · priced 7h 40m before the gameUnder 0.5-120 at BetMGMproj 0.31 → 0not measurableno closing quote✓ Won+0.83u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-120 at BetMGM
Locked before the game7h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.31 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.4%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.83u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Marcus Semien›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · hits · priced 13h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.62 → 1+0.93%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.77u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-130 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game13h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-145
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.62 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.8%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.77u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.93%
Munetaka Murakami›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · hits · priced 12h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at ProphetXproj 0.76 → 3+0.71%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.77u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-130 at ProphetX
Locked before the game12h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
Where our side closed-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.76 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.8%
Actual3 hits
Settled+0.77u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.71%
Ian Happ›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 11h 51m before the gameOver 0.5-134 at ProphetXproj 1.27 → 1+2.30%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.75u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-134 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 51m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-192
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.27 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.75u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.30%
Jake Mangum›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 10h 50m before the gameUnder 1.5-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.35 → 1−1.21%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.74u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game10h 50m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed-122
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.35 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed57.6%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.74u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.21%
Willy Adames›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · total bases · priced 14h 2m before the gameOver 0.5-140 at Fliffproj 1.63 → 2−1.53%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.71u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-140 at Fliff
Locked before the game14h 2m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-155
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.63 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.2%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.71u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.53%
Jacob Young›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · hits · priced 11h 32m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.73 → 2+1.98%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-150 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game11h 32m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed-163
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.73 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.5%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.98%
Javier Sanoja›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · hits · priced 11h 37m before the gameOver 0.5-164 at ProphetXproj 0.8 → 1+5.62%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-164 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-164
Where our side closed-210
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.8 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.5%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+5.62%
Carter Jensen›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 1.5-165 at ESPN BETproj 1.44 → 0+0.63%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-192
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.44 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.63%
Ezequiel Duran›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 12h 32m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at ESPN BETproj 1.88 → 40.00%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game12h 32m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.88 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.7%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish0.00%
Taylor Ward›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · total bases · priced 8h 56m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.37 → 2+1.52%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game8h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.37 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.4%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.52%
Nelson Velazquez›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 14h 13m before the gameUnder 1.5-170 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.84 → 0+3.99%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.59u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-170 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game14h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170 on 0.5
Where our side closed-200
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.84 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed63.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.59u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Kerry Carpenter›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · total bases · priced 10h 30m before the gameUnder 1.5-180 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.68 → 0−0.24%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.56u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-180 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game10h 30m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-185
Where our side closed-175
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.68 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed64.6%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.56u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Fernando Tatis Jr.›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · hits · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 1.5-190 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.08 → 0+0.77%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.53u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-190 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200
Where our side closed-220
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.08 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed66.0%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.53u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.77%
CJ Abrams›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · hits · priced 11h 32m before the gameOver 0.5-194 at ProphetXproj 1.44 → 3+0.91%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.52u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-194 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 32m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-194
Where our side closed-205
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.44 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed68.0%
Actual3 hits
Settled+0.52u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.91%
Elly De La Cruz›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · hits · priced 12h 12m before the gameOver 0.5-200proj 1.08 → 2+2.37%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-200 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game12h 12m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200 on 1.5
Where our side closed-240
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.08 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed69.6%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.37%
Dillon Dingler›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · hits · priced 13h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-220proj 0.96 → 2−0.88%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.45u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-220 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-220
Where our side closed-205
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.96 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed69.2%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.45u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.88%
Nick Gonzales›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · hits · priced 13h 33m before the gameOver 0.5-220proj 1.27 → 2+0.96%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.45u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-220 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 33m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-220 on 1.5
Where our side closed-235
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.27 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed70.0%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.45u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.96%
Alec Burleson›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · hits · priced 14h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-230proj 1.2 → 3−0.61%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.43u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-230 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-230 on 1.5
Where our side closed-215
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.2 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed70.1%
Actual3 hits
Settled+0.43u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.61%
Andrew Vaughn›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · hits · priced 11h 25m before the gameUnder 1.5-243 at DraftKingsproj 0.65 → 1−0.64%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.41u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-243 at DraftKings
Locked before the game11h 25m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-243
Where our side closed-235
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.65 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed71.5%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.41u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.64%
Riley Greene›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · hits · priced 11h 6m before the gameUnder 1.5-265 at DraftKingsproj 0.89 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.38u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-265 at DraftKings
Locked before the game11h 6m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-265 on 0.5
Where our side closed+200 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.89 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed72.7%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.38u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Austin Martin›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · total bases · priced 12h 7m before the gameUnder 1.5-165 at DraftKingsproj 0.66 → 2−1.10%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at DraftKings
Locked before the game12h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-184
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.66 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed64.5%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.10%
Bryce Harper›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 17h 17m before the gameUnder 1.5-142 at Caesarsproj 1.2 → 2−3.16%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-142 at Caesars
Locked before the game17h 17m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-162
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.2 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed60.6%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.16%
Byron Buxton›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 1.5-110 at Bovadaproj 1.82 → 0+2.22%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took-110 at Bovada
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed-127
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.82 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed52.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.22%
Carson Benge›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · hits · priced 13h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-160 at ProphetXproj 0.99 → 0−0.00%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-160 at ProphetX
Locked before the game13h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.99 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.2%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.00%
Casey Schmitt›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · hits · priced 18h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-190 at ProphetXproj 0.95 → 0+0.65%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-190 at ProphetX
Locked before the game18h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-200
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.95 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed66.1%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.65%
Chase DeLauter›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · total bases · priced 12h 13m before the gameOver 1.5+152 at BetOnlineproj 2.2 → 0−0.05%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+152 at BetOnline
Locked before the game12h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+152
Where our side closed+150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.2 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed40.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.05%
Colton Cowser›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 0.5+100 at ESPN BETproj 0.39 → 1−1.16%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 total bases
Price we took+100 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.39 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed52.0%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.16%
Drew Gilbert›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · total bases · priced 14h 2m before the gameOver 0.5-123 at Fliffproj 1.05 → 0+2.75%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-123 at Fliff
Locked before the game14h 2m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed-143
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.05 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.75%
Drew Romo›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · hits · priced 12h 7m before the gameUnder 0.5+100 at ESPN BETproj 0.27 → 1+1.09%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+100 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game12h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed-105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.27 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.4%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.09%
Edwin Arroyo›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · hits · priced 12h 12m before the gameOver 0.5-130proj 0.73 → 0+5.02%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-130 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game12h 12m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-154 on 1.5
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.73 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.3%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+5.02%
Elias Diaz›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 12h 32m before the gameOver 0.5+100 at BetOnlineproj 1.2 → 0+1.16%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+100 at BetOnline
Locked before the game12h 32m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.2 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.16%
Gavin Sheets›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · hits · priced 11h 37m before the gameUnder 0.5+140 at ESPN BETproj 0.38 → 1+0.73%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+140 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+140
Where our side closed+130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.38 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed43.1%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.73%
Geraldo Perdomo›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · total bases · priced 10h 1m before the gameUnder 1.5-135 at Bovadaproj 1.13 → 4−0.39%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at Bovada
Locked before the game10h 1m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed-133
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.13 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed57.5%
Actual4 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.39%
Heriberto Hernandez›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · total bases · priced 11h 37m before the gameOver 1.5+125 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 2.21 → 0−1.74%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+125 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game11h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+125
Where our side closed+134
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.21 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed46.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Isaac Paredes›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · total bases · priced 12h 7m before the gameOver 1.5+145 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.91 → 0+0.23%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+145 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game12h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+145
Where our side closed+154
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.91 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.23%
J.P. Crawford›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · hits · priced 12h 32m before the gameOver 0.5-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.79 → 0−2.90%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 32m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
Where our side closed-120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.79 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.7%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.90%
Jackson Chourio›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameUnder 1.5-105 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.34 → 4−3.61%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-105 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-115
Where our side closed+108
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.34 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed52.0%
Actual4 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jackson Holliday›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameOver 0.5-120 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.96 → 0−2.56%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-120 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed-118
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.96 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
James Outman›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · hits · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 0.5-110 at ESPN BETproj 0.35 → 1−0.79%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-110 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed-104
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.35 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed52.4%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.79%
Jonah Heim›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · hits · priced 12h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-174 at DraftKingsproj 0.83 → 0+3.81%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-174 at DraftKings
Locked before the game12h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-223
Where our side closed-203
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.83 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.1%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.81%
Jordan Walker›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 12h 12m before the gameOver 1.5+100 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.8 → 0−0.97%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+100 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 12m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed+106
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.8 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jose Altuve›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · total bases · priced 12h 7m before the gameOver 1.5+140 at ESPN BETproj 1.9 → 0−1.04%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+140 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game12h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+140
Where our side closed+144
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.9 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.04%
Jose Caballero›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 17h 17m before the gameOver 0.5-123 at BetOnlineproj 1.22 → 0+1.02%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-123 at BetOnline
Locked before the game17h 17m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-123
Where our side closed-143
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.22 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.02%
Josh Smith›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 12h 32m before the gameOver 0.5-105 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.07 → 0+5.30%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-105 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 32m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.07 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+5.30%
Kazuma Okamoto›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · hits · priced 13h 33m before the gameOver 0.5-174 at DraftKingsproj 0.73 → 0−2.77%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-174 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 33m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-216
Where our side closed-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.73 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.1%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.77%
Kyle Tucker›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · hits · priced 13h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-146 at ProphetXproj 0.79 → 0+0.64%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-146 at ProphetX
Locked before the game13h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-184
Where our side closed-156
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.79 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.2%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.64%
Luis Lara›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 12h 7m before the gameUnder 1.5-190proj 0.83 → 4+0.88%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-190 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game12h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190 on 1
Where our side closed-190
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.83 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed65.6%
Actual4 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.88%
Luke Keaschall›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · hits · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at DraftKingsproj 0.91 → 0+4.11%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-150 at DraftKings
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-186
Where our side closed-184
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.91 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.8%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.11%
Luke Raley›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 12h 32m before the gameOver 0.5+100 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.11 → 00.00%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+100 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 32m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.11 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed52.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish0.00%
Michael Harris II›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameOver 1.5+110 at ProphetXproj 2.14 → 1+1.46%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+110 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed+105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.14 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed49.0%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.46%
Mookie Betts›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · hits · priced 13h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-174 at ProphetXproj 0.76 → 0+3.16%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-174 at ProphetX
Locked before the game13h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-220
Where our side closed-200
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.76 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed66.4%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.16%
Nolan Arenado›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · total bases · priced 11h 1m before the gameOver 1.5+136 at ProphetXproj 1.74 → 0+0.58%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+136 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 1m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+125
Where our side closed+133
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.74 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.58%
Nolan Schanuel›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · hits · priced 16h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-184 at DraftKingsproj 1.22 → 0+0.17%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-184 at DraftKings
Locked before the game16h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-216
Where our side closed-190
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.22 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed66.3%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.17%
Travis Bazzana›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameOver 0.5-127 at ProphetXproj 1.45 → 0+1.96%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-127 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-145
Where our side closed-145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.45 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.96%
Tristan Peters›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · total bases · priced 12h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-140 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.38 → 0+1.78%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-140 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game12h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.38 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Willson Contreras›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 13h 33m before the gameOver 1.5+126 at DraftKingsproj 2.1 → 0−1.49%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+126 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 33m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+117
Where our side closed+132
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.1 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.49%
Henry Davis›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 10h 41m before the gameOver 0.5-103 at BetOnlineproj 1.04+1.53%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-103 at BetOnline
Locked before the game10h 41m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed-178
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.04 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed53.1%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jonathan Aranda›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · hits · priced 12h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-174 at ProphetXproj 1.1+0.25%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-174 at ProphetX
Locked before the game12h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-174
Where our side closed-192
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.1 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.8%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jung Hoo Lee›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · hits · priced 18h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-194 at ProphetXproj 0.93not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-194 at ProphetX
Locked before the game18h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-194
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.93 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed71.1%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Luis Urias›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · hits · priced 13h 33m before the gameUnder 0.5+102 at DraftKingsproj 0.38not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+102 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 33m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-111
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.38 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.8%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Myles Straw›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · hits · priced 13h 33m before the gameUnder 0.5+110 at DraftKingsproj 0.27not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+110 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 33m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+101
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.27 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed49.6%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Shea Langeliers›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · total bases · priced 12h 7m before the gameOver 1.5+130 at Bovadaproj 1.96+3.47%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+130 at Bovada
Locked before the game12h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed+113
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.96 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed48.3%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jul 25Sat36−29−1.69urunning −1.42u10 voidprevious model
Jordan Walker›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 15h 13m before the gameOver 1.5+136 at DraftKingsproj 1.83 → 3+1.94%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.36u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+136 at DraftKings
Locked before the game15h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+118
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.83 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.1%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.36u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.94%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.50%
…of which: waiting paid+4.14%
…of which: market drift−0.64%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.14% + −0.64% = +3.50%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.94% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game45¢
With Kalshi’s fee47¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Luis Arraez›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · total bases · priced 14h 3m before the gameOver 1.5+135 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.59 → 2+5.07%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.35u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+135 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game14h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+135
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.59 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.8%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.35u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
CJ Abrams›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · total bases · priced 14h 3m before the gameOver 1.5+130 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 2.58 → 7+1.88%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.30u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+130 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game14h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+130
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.58 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.3%
Actual7 total bases
Settled+1.30u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.88%
Colton Cowser›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · hits · priced 17h 3m before the gameUnder 0.5+125proj 0.27 → 0+0.17%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.25u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+125 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+120
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.27 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed45.9%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.25u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.17%
Junior Caminero›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · total bases · priced 16h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+115 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 2.03 → 2+0.22%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.15u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+115 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game16h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.03 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed49.0%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.15u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Gavin Sheets›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · hits · priced 14h 8m before the gameUnder 0.5+110 at ESPN BETproj 0.43 → 0+1.21%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.10u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+110 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+110
Where our side closed+104
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.43 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed47.9%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.10u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.21%
Michael Harris II›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · total bases · priced 15h 3m before the gameOver 1.5+105proj 2.22 → 2+1.26%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.05u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+105 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-113
Where our side closed-101
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.22 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.5%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.05u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.26%
Ezequiel Tovar›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 17h 8m before the gameOver 0.5+100proj 1 → 1+5.53%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+100 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed-125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed50.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+5.53%
Dalton Rushing›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · total bases · priced 17h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-125 at Fliffproj 1.02 → 1−4.41%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.80u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-125 at Fliff
Locked before the game17h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170
Where our side closed-105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.02 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.4%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.80u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−4.41%
Jackson Merrill›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · hits · priced 12h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at ESPN BETproj 0.98 → 3+2.99%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.77u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-130 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game12h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.98 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.8%
Actual3 hits
Settled+0.77u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.99%
Luke Raley›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 17h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-130proj 1.07 → 1−2.18%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.77u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-130 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
Where our side closed-125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.07 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.3%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.77u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.18%
Tristan Peters›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · hits · priced 13h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at ProphetXproj 0.84 → 1+1.30%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.77u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-130 at ProphetX
Locked before the game13h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-144
Where our side closed-134
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.84 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.5%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.77u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.30%
Kyle Tucker›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · total bases · priced 15h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-134 at Fliffproj 1.1 → 4−0.64%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.75u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-134 at Fliff
Locked before the game15h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.1 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.3%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+0.75u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.64%
Jacob Young›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · total bases · priced 12h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-138 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.15 → 2+2.08%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.72u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-138 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-145
Where our side closed-145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.15 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.4%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.72u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Dylan Crews›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · total bases · priced 11h 11m before the gameUnder 1.5-140 at ESPN BETproj 1.31 → 0+2.14%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.71u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-140 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 11m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-159
Where our side closed-158
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.31 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed58.6%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.71u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.14%
Jake Bauers›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 17h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-140 at BetOnlineproj 1.33 → 2+1.01%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.71u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-140 at BetOnline
Locked before the game17h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140 on 1.5
Where our side closed-155
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.33 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.5%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.71u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.01%
Alec Bohm›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 14h 3m before the gameUnder 1.5-145 at Fliffproj 1.35 → 0+0.95%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.69u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-145 at Fliff
Locked before the game14h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed-155
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.35 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed59.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.69u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.95%
Carson Benge›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · total bases · priced 13h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-150proj 1.39 → 1−1.10%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150 on 1
Where our side closed-149
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.39 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.9%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.10%
Manny Machado›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · hits · priced 12h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.02 → 1+2.34%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-150 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed-174
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.02 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.8%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.34%
Munetaka Murakami›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · total bases · priced 17h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.73 → 1not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game17h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed+150 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.73 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Trent Grisham›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 16h 3m before the gameUnder 1.5-150 at Fliffproj 1.27 → 0+1.40%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at Fliff
Locked before the game16h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-175
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.27 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed60.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.40%
Nick Loftin›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · total bases · priced 11h 21m before the gameOver 0.5-155 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.4 → 4+0.58%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.65u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-155 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game11h 21m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.4 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.0%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+0.65u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.58%
Jake Mangum›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 16h 38m before the gameUnder 1.5-160 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.39 → 1−1.01%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.63u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-160 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.39 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed61.7%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.63u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.01%
Esmerlyn Valdez›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · hits · priced 20h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-164 at ProphetXproj 0.86 → 1+0.45%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-164 at ProphetX
Locked before the game20h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-164
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.86 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.3%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.45%
Cooper Pratt›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · hits · priced 13h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.96 → 3+0.42%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-165 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game13h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-185
Where our side closed-175
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.96 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.9%
Actual3 hits
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.42%
Ezequiel Duran›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 17h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.71 → 4+1.26%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game17h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-180
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.71 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.9%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.26%
Mike Trout›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · hits · priced 10h 31m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at BetMGMproj 0.93 → 2+2.06%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-165 at BetMGM
Locked before the game10h 31m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-180
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.93 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.8%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.06%
Taylor Ward›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · total bases · priced 15h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-165proj 1.37 → 1not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180 on 1
Where our side closed+152 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.37 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.2%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Travis Bazzana›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at ESPN BETproj 1.44 → 2not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160
Where our side closed+150 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.44 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.9%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Nico Hoerner›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · hits · priced 18h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-182 at ProphetXproj 1.03 → 1+0.88%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.55u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-182 at ProphetX
Locked before the game18h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-240
Where our side closed-182
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.03 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed65.2%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.55u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.88%
Masyn Winn›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 15h 13m before the gameUnder 1.5-190 at DraftKingsproj 0.69 → 1+2.12%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.53u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-190 at DraftKings
Locked before the game15h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-198
Where our side closed-200
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.69 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed66.7%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.53u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.12%
Vaughn Grissom›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · hits · priced 12h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-190 at ESPN BETproj 1.06 → 1−0.40%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.53u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-190 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game12h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-200
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.06 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed65.8%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.53u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.40%
Sal Stewart›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · hits · priced 15h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-200 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.94 → 1+2.08%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-200 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game15h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200 on 1.5
Where our side closed-220
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed68.2%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.08%
Ketel Marte›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · hits · priced 12h 3m before the gameUnder 1.5-213 at DraftKingsproj 0.94 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.47u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-213 at DraftKings
Locked before the game12h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-248
Where our side closed+203 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed68.3%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.47u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Heliot Ramos›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · hits · priced 14h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-220 at ESPN BETproj 1.05 → 1not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.45u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-220 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game14h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-220
Where our side closed+208 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.05 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed69.0%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.45u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Wyatt Langford›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · hits · priced 17h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-220 at ProphetXproj 1.25 → 3−1.99%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.45u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-220 at ProphetX
Locked before the game17h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-240
Where our side closed-182
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.25 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed68.8%
Actual3 hits
Settled+0.45u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.99%
AndréS Chaparro›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · total bases · priced 14h 3m before the gameUnder 1.5-165 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.22 → 2not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game14h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165 on 0.5
Where our side closed+110 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.22 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed63.2%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Andres Gimenez›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · hits · priced 14h 8m before the gameUnder 0.5+120proj 0.48 → 2+0.38%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+120 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+114
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.48 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed45.5%
Actual2 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.38%
Anthony Seigler›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-149 at BetOnlineproj 1.56 → 0+0.44%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-149 at BetOnline
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+178 on 1.5
Where our side closed-156
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.56 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.44%
Ben Rice›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 14h 3m before the gameOver 1.5+110 at Fliffproj 2.47 → 0+0.88%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+110 at Fliff
Locked before the game14h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-115
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.47 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed48.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.88%
Ben Williamson›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-160 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.08 → 0−1.52%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-160 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170
Where our side closed-152
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.08 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Brandon Nimmo›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 15h 13m before the gameOver 1.5+130 at ProphetXproj 1.83 → 0−0.38%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+130 at ProphetX
Locked before the game15h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-110
Where our side closed+130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.83 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.38%
Byron Buxton›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · total bases · priced 15h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+100proj 1.91 → 0+3.39%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+100 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-145
Where our side closed-120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.91 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed53.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.39%
Caleb Durbin›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-165proj 1.4 → 0−0.49%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-192 on 1.5
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.4 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.49%
Chase Meidroth›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · hits · priced 15h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at ESPN BETproj 1.09 → 0+1.35%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-150 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game15h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160
Where our side closed-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.09 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.3%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.35%
Cole Young›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · hits · priced 19h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-174 at ProphetXproj 0.89 → 0−1.53%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-174 at ProphetX
Locked before the game19h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-174
Where our side closed-163
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.89 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed66.3%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.53%
Colt Keith›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · total bases · priced 11h 55m before the gameUnder 1.5-160 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.09 → 3−1.18%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-160 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game11h 55m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-175
Where our side closed-155
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.09 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.9%
Actual3 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.18%
Gleyber Torres›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · hits · priced 13h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-190 at DraftKingsproj 1.13 → 0−1.62%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-190 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-233
Where our side closed-174
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.13 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed65.9%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.62%
Jasson DomíNguez›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 14h 3m before the gameUnder 1.5-160proj 1.34 → 4−0.40%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-160 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.34 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed61.8%
Actual4 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jose Altuve›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameOver 1.5+160 at ESPN BETproj 1.91 → 0+0.06%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+160 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+138
Where our side closed+162
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.91 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed38.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.06%
Jose Siri›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · hits · priced 14h 3m before the gameUnder 0.5+120 at ESPN BETproj 0.44 → 2+8.03%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+120 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game14h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+120
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.44 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed49.2%
Actual2 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+8.03%
Kerry Carpenter›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · hits · priced 15h 8m before the gameUnder 0.5+145 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.4 → 1−0.74%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+145 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game15h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+145
Where our side closed+155
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.4 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed41.8%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.74%
Kyle Manzardo›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · total bases · priced 16h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-120 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.93 → 0+0.03%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-120 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game16h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.93 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
LaMonte Wade Jr.›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · hits · priced 13h 8m before the gameUnder 0.5-110 at ESPN BETproj 0.45 → 1−1.06%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-110 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game13h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-110
Where our side closed-108
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.45 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed53.3%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.06%
Luis Robert Jr.›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · total bases · priced 13h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-118proj 1.19 → 0+2.01%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-118 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135 on 1
Where our side closed-128
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.19 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Matt Olson›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · total bases · priced 15h 3m before the gameOver 1.5+110proj 2.11 → 0−0.17%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+110 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-104
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.11 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed48.6%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.17%
Nathan Lukes›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameUnder 1.5-165proj 1.18 → 4−0.73%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.18 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.6%
Actual4 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.73%
Nick Gonzales›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 18h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+139 at ProphetXproj 1.9 → 1+0.13%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+139 at ProphetX
Locked before the game18h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+120
Where our side closed+145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.9 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.3%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.13%
Otto Lopez›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · total bases · priced 12h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+120 at ESPN BETproj 2.19 → 1+0.71%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+120 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game12h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed+113
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.19 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed48.9%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.71%
Ryan Kreidler›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · hits · priced 13h 8m before the gameUnder 0.5+125proj 0.47 → 1+3.47%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+125 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+105
Where our side closed+115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.47 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed44.5%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.47%
TJ Rumfield›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · hits · priced 21h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.1 → 0+0.49%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-150 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game21h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-151
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.1 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.4%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.49%
Trea Turner›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 14h 3m before the gameOver 1.5+120 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.83 → 1−0.48%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+120 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game14h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+105
Where our side closed+118
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.83 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.6%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Tyler Stephenson›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · hits · priced 17h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-166 at DraftKingsproj 1.07 → 00.00%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-166 at DraftKings
Locked before the game17h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-155
Where our side closed-166
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.07 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.6%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish0.00%
Willson Contreras›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 16h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+161 at ProphetXproj 2.26 → 0not measurableno closing quote✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+161 at ProphetX
Locked before the game16h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.26 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed38.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Exchange cross-check
Xavier Edwards›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · hits · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-200 at ESPN BETproj 1.03 → 0−0.02%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-200 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200
Where our side closed-210
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.03 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed69.1%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.02%
Andrew Vaughn›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 17h 8m before the gameUnder 1.5-170 at Hard Rock Betproj 1−3.47%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-170 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game17h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed-159
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed64.1%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Brandon Lowe›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · hits · priced 14h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-140 at ProphetXproj 0.94−2.43%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-140 at ProphetX
Locked before the game14h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed-147
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.9%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.43%
Chase DeLauter›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · hits · priced 16h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-200 at ESPN BETproj 1.27+2.74%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-200 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game16h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200
Where our side closed-240
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.27 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed67.8%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.74%
Colby Thomas›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · hits · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 0.5+125 at BetMGMproj 0.45not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+125 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.45 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed47.7%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
James Outman›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · hits · priced 13h 8m before the gameUnder 0.5-116 at DraftKingsproj 0.35not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-116 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-127
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.35 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.2%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Luke Keaschall›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · hits · priced 13h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-154proj 0.91not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-154 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-225
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.91 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.6%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Max Muncy›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · total bases · priced 13h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-140proj 1.15not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-140 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140 on 1
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.15 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.1%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Nelson Velazquez›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · hits · priced 17h 13m before the gameUnder 0.5+120 at Fliffproj 0.35+7.82%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+120 at Fliff
Locked before the game17h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed-114
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.35 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed47.0%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Sam Huff›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · hits · priced 13h 3m before the gameUnder 0.5-115proj 0.31not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-115 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.31 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.4%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Shea Langeliers›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · total bases · priced 11h 46m before the gameOver 1.5+115 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.96+0.90%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+115 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game11h 46m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-115
Where our side closed+104
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.96 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.8%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jul 24Fri37−29+3.23urunning +0.26u9 voidprevious model
Chase DeLauter›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · total bases · priced 21h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+161proj 2.16 → 2+3.03%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+161 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game21h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+125
Where our side closed+141
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.16 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed38.9%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.03%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.18%
…of which: waiting paid+6.13%
…of which: market drift−2.95%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.13% + −2.95% = +3.18%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.03% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game41¢
With Kalshi’s fee43¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Matt Olson›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · total bases · priced 17h 3m before the gameOver 1.5+141proj 1.98 → 5−0.84%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.41u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+141 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+120
Where our side closed+146
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.98 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.0%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+1.41u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.84%
Heriberto Hernandez›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · total bases · priced 17h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+136proj 2.15 → 6+2.25%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.36u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+136 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+135
Where our side closed+127
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.15 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.5%
Actual6 total bases
Settled+1.36u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.25%
Casey Schmitt›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · total bases · priced 16h 13m before the gameOver 1.5+135 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.89 → 40.00%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.35u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+135 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.89 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.1%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.35u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish0.00%
CJ Abrams›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · total bases · priced 16h 43m before the gameOver 1.5+135 at Caesarsproj 2.54 → 2+0.31%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.35u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+135 at Caesars
Locked before the game16h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+123
Where our side closed+138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.54 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.7%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.35u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.31%
Michael Harris II›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · total bases · priced 17h 3m before the gameOver 1.5+130proj 2.17 → 3−0.99%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.30u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+130 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+132
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.17 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.6%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.30u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.99%
Myles Straw›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · hits · priced 19h 13m before the gameUnder 0.5+126 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.28 → 0+2.44%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.26u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+126 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game19h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+110
Where our side closed+115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.28 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed47.0%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.26u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.44%
Eli White›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · hits · priced 17h 3m before the gameUnder 0.5+120proj 0.42 → 0+1.51%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.20u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+120 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+105
Where our side closed+107
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.42 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed47.9%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.20u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.51%
Shea Langeliers›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · total bases · priced 16h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+115proj 1.92 → 2+1.57%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.15u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+115 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+108
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.92 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed46.9%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.15u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.57%
Colton Cowser›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · total bases · priced 17h 3m before the gameUnder 0.5+110proj 0.4 → 0−2.29%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.10u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 total bases
Price we took+110 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-115
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.4 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+1.10u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.29%
Ryan Kreidler›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · hits · priced 18h 8m before the gameUnder 0.5+110proj 0.48 → 0+2.03%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.10u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+110 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game18h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed+104
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.48 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.2%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.10u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.03%
Austin Hedges›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · total bases · priced 17h 8m before the gameOver 0.5+100proj 1.15 → 5−3.28%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+100 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.15 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.8%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.28%
Jared Young›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · hits · priced 17h 8m before the gameOver 0.5+100proj 0.75 → 2+2.63%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took+100 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.75 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.3%
Actual2 hits
Settled+1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.63%
David Fry›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · hits · priced 21h 8m before the gameUnder 0.5-105proj 0.28 → 0−0.04%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.95u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-105 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game21h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-124
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.28 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed53.2%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.95u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.04%
Taylor Trammell›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · hits · priced 11h 55m before the gameUnder 0.5-110 at BetMGMproj 0.43 → 0+4.24%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.91u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-110 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 55m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed-149
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.43 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.8%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.91u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.24%
Ali Sanchez›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · hits · priced 16h 43m before the gameUnder 0.5-120 at DraftKingsproj 0.36 → 0+3.53%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.83u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-120 at DraftKings
Locked before the game16h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-144
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.36 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.1%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.83u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.53%
Buddy Kennedy›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · hits · priced 16h 3m before the gameUnder 0.5-120 at DraftKingsproj 0.09 → 0+6.99%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.83u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-120 at DraftKings
Locked before the game16h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-148
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.09 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.6%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.83u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+6.99%
Jared Triolo›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 16h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at BetOnlineproj 1.15 → 1+1.33%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.77u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at BetOnline
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-143
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.15 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.4%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.77u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.33%
Carlos Cortes›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · total bases · priced 18h 8m before the gameUnder 1.5-140proj 1.13 → 0+3.21%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.71u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-140 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game18h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed-156
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.13 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed58.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.71u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.21%
Munetaka Murakami›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · total bases · priced 11h 55m before the gameOver 0.5-140 at BetMGMproj 1.65 → 2not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.71u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-140 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 55m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+130 on 1.5
Where our side closed+145 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.65 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.5%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.71u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Jonny Deluca›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · total bases · priced 13h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-143 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.33 → 2−1.85%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.70u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-143 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game13h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-145 on 1.5
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.33 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.2%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.70u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.85%
TJ Rumfield›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-143 at BetOnlineproj 1.51 → 3not measurableno closing quote✓ Won+0.70u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-143 at BetOnline
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+199 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.51 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.7%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+0.70u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Luis Robert Jr.›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · total bases · priced 15h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at BetOnlineproj 1.03 → 4not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at BetOnline
Locked before the game15h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150 on 1.5
Where our side closed+175 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.03 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.0%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Salvador Perez›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · total bases · priced 12h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at ESPN BETproj 1.76 → 2+1.32%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game12h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.76 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.8%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.32%
Joc Pederson›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 11h 54m before the gameOver 0.5-160 at BetMGMproj 1.68 → 1not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.63u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-160 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 54m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+135 on 1.5
Where our side closed+138 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.68 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.63u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Kyle Tucker›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · hits · priced 21h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-164 at DraftKingsproj 0.82 → 2+0.05%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-164 at DraftKings
Locked before the game21h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-212
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.82 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.3%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.05%
Ryan O'Hearn›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 16h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-164 at BetOnlineproj 1.57 → 2−0.65%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-164 at BetOnline
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+171 on 1.5
Where our side closed-170
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.57 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.9%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.65%
Blaze Jordan›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 16h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at BetOnlineproj 1.03 → 20.00%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at BetOnline
Locked before the game16h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-164
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.03 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.3%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish0.00%
Braden Montgomery›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · total bases · priced 17h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at BetOnlineproj 1.42 → 3not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at BetOnline
Locked before the game17h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165 on 1.5
Where our side closed+164 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.42 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.6%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Hunter Goodman›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · hits · priced 18h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-170proj 1.11 → 1−1.36%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.59u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-170 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game18h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-176
Where our side closed-164
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.11 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.2%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.59u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.36%
Paul Goldschmidt›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · hits · priced 20h 43m before the gameOver 0.5-170 at DraftKingsproj 0.6 → 1+1.92%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.59u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-170 at DraftKings
Locked before the game20h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-225
Where our side closed-200
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.6 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.5%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.59u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.92%
Wyatt Langford›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · hits · priced 22h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-172 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.22 → 1+1.17%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.58u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-172 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game22h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-225
Where our side closed-194
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.22 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed66.3%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.58u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.17%
Kyle Stowers›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · hits · priced 13h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-174proj 0.86 → 1+5.73%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.57u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-174 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-226
Where our side closed-225
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.86 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed67.4%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.57u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+5.73%
Kyle Schwarber›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · hits · priced 16h 43m before the gameOver 0.5-175 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.89 → 1−4.62%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.57u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-175 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200
Where our side closed-144
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.89 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.8%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.57u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−4.62%
Ivan Herrera›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 16h 13m before the gameUnder 1.5-180proj 1.03 → 0−1.17%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.56u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-180 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-235
Where our side closed-190
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.03 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed65.6%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.56u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.17%
Brandon Nimmo›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · hits · priced 22h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-184 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.05 → 2−1.01%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.54u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-184 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game22h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-194
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.05 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed67.3%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.54u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.01%
Masyn Winn›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 18h 13m before the gameUnder 1.5-190 at BetOnlineproj 0.78 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.53u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-190 at BetOnline
Locked before the game18h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-217
Where our side closed+164 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.78 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed67.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.53u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Alec Burleson›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 14h 13m before the gameOver 1.5+115 at Fliffproj 1.68 → 0−1.06%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+115 at Fliff
Locked before the game14h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-115
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.68 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.06%
AndréS Chaparro›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · hits · priced 16h 43m before the gameUnder 0.5+125 at DraftKingsproj 0.48 → 1+0.88%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+125 at DraftKings
Locked before the game16h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+113
Where our side closed+123
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.48 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed45.8%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.88%
Austin Martin›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · hits · priced 14h 8m before the gameUnder 0.5+143proj 0.45 → 1−3.22%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+143 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+154
Where our side closed+165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.45 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed41.4%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.22%
Ben Rice›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · hits · priced 20h 43m before the gameOver 0.5-164 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.13 → 0−1.29%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-164 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game20h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-220
Where our side closed-164
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.13 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed66.2%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.29%
Brandon Lowe›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 16h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-145 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.59 → 0−2.74%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-145 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-145
Where our side closed-138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.59 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.6%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Bryson Stott›New York Yankees vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 16h 43m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at ESPN BETproj 1.52 → 0+0.62%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game16h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.52 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.62%
Coby Mayo›Atlanta Braves vs Baltimore Orioles · hits · priced 17h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-110 at Fliffproj 0.6 → 0+0.45%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-110 at Fliff
Locked before the game17h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed-112
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.6 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.4%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.45%
Basis
Curtis Mead›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · total bases · priced 16h 43m before the gameOver 1.5+140 at DraftKingsproj 2.23 → 0+1.10%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+140 at DraftKings
Locked before the game16h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+137
Where our side closed+138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.23 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.10%
Ernie Clement›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 21h 13m before the gameOver 1.5+117 at Caesarsproj 1.53 → 0+0.12%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+117 at Caesars
Locked before the game21h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-110
Where our side closed+112
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.53 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed48.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.12%
Esmerlyn Valdez›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 16h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+140proj 2.51 → 0+2.68%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+140 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+125
Where our side closed+122
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.51 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.68%
Ildemaro Vargas›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · hits · priced 16h 43m before the gameOver 0.5-200 at DraftKingsproj 1.04 → 0−2.84%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-200 at DraftKings
Locked before the game16h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-234
Where our side closed-192
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.04 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed67.0%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.84%
Jackson Merrill›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · total bases · priced 21h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+136 at Fliffproj 1.74 → 0+2.61%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+136 at Fliff
Locked before the game21h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-115
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.74 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.61%
Javier Sanoja›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · hits · priced 21h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-184proj 0.84 → 0−0.11%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-184 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game21h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-184
Where our side closed-200
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.84 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed66.0%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.11%
Jimmy Crooks›Cincinnati Reds vs St. Louis Cardinals · hits · priced 20h 13m before the gameUnder 0.5-101 at BetOnlineproj 0.41 → 1+1.76%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-101 at BetOnline
Locked before the game20h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-101
Where our side closed-108
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.41 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed50.7%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.76%
Joey Ortiz›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-135 at BetOnlineproj 1.64 → 0not measurableno closing quote✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at BetOnline
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-156
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.64 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Kazuma Okamoto›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 21h 13m before the gameUnder 1.5-159 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.32 → 6−0.25%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-159 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game21h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-185
Where our side closed-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.32 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed61.7%
Actual6 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.25%
Luis Arraez›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · hits · priced 16h 13m before the gameUnder 1.5-175 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.19 → 2+1.96%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-175 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200
Where our side closed-200
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.19 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed64.5%
Actual2 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.96%
Nick Gonzales›Chicago Cubs vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · priced 18h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+124 at Fliffproj 1.94 → 1−0.46%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+124 at Fliff
Locked before the game18h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed+133
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.94 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.9%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.46%
Nolan Arenado›Arizona Diamondbacks vs Washington Nationals · total bases · priced 16h 43m before the gameOver 1.5+140 at DraftKingsproj 1.91 → 0+1.87%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+140 at DraftKings
Locked before the game16h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+128
Where our side closed+135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.91 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.87%
Otto Lopez›San Diego Padres vs Miami Marlins · total bases · priced 21h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+113 at Fliffproj 2.2 → 1+1.14%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+113 at Fliff
Locked before the game21h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed+105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.2 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.14%
Riley Greene›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · total bases · priced 14h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+120proj 1.96 → 0−1.71%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+120 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+106
Where our side closed+132
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.96 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed46.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.71%
Ryan Jeffers›Athletics vs Minnesota Twins · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+141proj 1.89 → 1+2.54%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+141 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+134
Where our side closed+133
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.89 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.5%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.54%
Starling Marte›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · total bases · priced 16h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-110 at ESPN BETproj 0.94 → 0+3.51%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-110 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-110
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed52.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.51%
Teoscar Hernandez›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · total bases · priced 11h 55m before the gameUnder 1.5-175 at BetMGMproj 0.94 → 3+2.92%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-175 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 55m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-195 on 1
Where our side closed-208
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed64.5%
Actual3 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.92%
Vinnie Pasquantino›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · total bases · priced 16h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.32 → 0+2.84%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed-145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.32 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Vladimir Guerrero Jr.›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · hits · priced 17h 13m before the gameUnder 1.5-233 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.86 → 2+0.21%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-233 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game17h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-260
Where our side closed-235
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.86 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed70.4%
Actual2 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.21%
Willson Contreras›Toronto Blue Jays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 19h 13m before the gameOver 1.5+134 at Bovadaproj 2.27 → 1+1.85%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+134 at Bovada
Locked before the game19h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+126
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.27 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.2%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.85%
Willy Adames›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · total bases · priced 16h 13m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at ESPN BETproj 1.72 → 0not measurableno closing quote✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game16h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.72 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Yordan Alvarez›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · total bases · priced 17h 38m before the gameOver 1.5-110 at Fliffproj 2.96 → 1+2.81%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took-110 at Fliff
Locked before the game17h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed-120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.96 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed54.6%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.81%
Braxton Fulford›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · hits · priced 16h 8m before the gameUnder 0.5-127proj 0.24+3.07%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-127 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-133
Where our side closed-144
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.24 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.9%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Brett Baty›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Mets · hits · priced 17h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-105proj 0.92+1.61%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-105 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
Where our side closed-112
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.92 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.8%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Cooper Pratt›Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at BetOnlineproj 1.35not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at BetOnline
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.35 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.0%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Jake Rogers›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · hits · priced 16h 38m before the gameUnder 0.5+110 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.5+2.00%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+110 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed-105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.5 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.6%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Josh Jung›Seattle Mariners vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 11h 54m before the gameOver 1.5+158 at BetOnlineproj 1.76+1.41%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+158 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h 54m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+146
Where our side closed+144
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.76 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed38.9%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Logan O'Hoppe›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · hits · priced 20h 13m before the gameUnder 0.5+120 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.5−0.06%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+120 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game20h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+110
Where our side closed+115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.5 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed46.1%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Oswald Peraza›Los Angeles Angels vs San Francisco Giants · hits · priced 16h 13m before the gameUnder 0.5+136 at DraftKingsproj 0.49−0.60%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+136 at DraftKings
Locked before the game16h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+117
Where our side closed+134
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.49 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed42.9%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Taylor Walls›Cleveland Guardians vs Tampa Bay Rays · total bases · priced 17h 8m before the gameOver 0.5+100proj 0.84not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+100 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.84 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed50.9%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Yainer Diaz›Houston Astros vs Chicago White Sox · total bases · priced 21h 38m before the gameUnder 1.5-172 at ProphetXproj 1.5−1.70%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-172 at ProphetX
Locked before the game21h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-172
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.5 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed65.5%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jul 23Thu15−10+2.57urunning −2.97uprevious model
Gabriel Moreno›Arizona Diamondbacks vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 9h 13m before the gameOver 1.5+148 at ProphetXproj 1.65 → 4+2.81%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.48u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+148 at ProphetX
Locked before the game9h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+140
Where our side closed+133
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.65 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed40.5%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.48u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.81%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.60%
…of which: waiting paid+1.34%
…of which: market drift+1.25%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.34% + +1.25% = +2.60%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.81% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game40¢
With Kalshi’s fee42¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Dillon Dingler›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · total bases · priced 14h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+120 at Hard Rock Betproj 2.08 → 3−0.45%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.20u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+120 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game14h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+110
Where our side closed+122
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.08 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.6%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.20u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.45%
Jordan Walker›Arizona Diamondbacks vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 13h 13m before the gameOver 1.5+116 at DraftKingsproj 1.88 → 3+0.16%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.16u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+116 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.88 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed46.8%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.16u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.16%
Michael Harris II›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 11h 45m before the gameOver 1.5+114 at ProphetXproj 2.2 → 5+1.79%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.14u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+114 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 45m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.2 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.1%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+1.14u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.79%
Luis Urias›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · hits · priced 11h 58m before the gameUnder 0.5+112 at betPARXproj 0.44 → 0+2.04%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.12u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+112 at betPARX
Locked before the game11h 58m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.44 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed49.4%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.12u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.04%
Myles Straw›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · hits · priced 17h 5m before the gameUnder 0.5-110 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.32 → 0−1.88%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.91u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-110 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game17h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-110
Where our side closed+104
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.32 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed53.5%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.91u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.88%
Isaac Collins›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · hits · priced 16h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-128 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.86 → 1+0.57%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.78u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-128 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.86 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.0%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.78u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.57%
Luke Keaschall›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 11h 36m before the gameOver 0.5-143 at BetOnlineproj 1.43 → 1+0.43%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.70u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-143 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170
Where our side closed-143
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.43 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.3%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.70u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.43%
Kazuma Okamoto›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 13h 5m before the gameUnder 1.5-147 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.36 → 0+1.67%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.68u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-147 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game13h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.36 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed60.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.68u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.67%
Austin Riley›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · hits · priced 11h 45m before the gameOver 0.5-160 at ProphetXproj 0.91 → 1+1.65%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.63u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-160 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 45m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-185
Where our side closed-184
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.91 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.6%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.63u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.65%
Zach McKinstry›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · total bases · priced 12h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-160 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.96 → 2not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.63u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-160 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game12h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160 on 1.5
Where our side closed+186 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.96 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.7%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.63u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Michael Massey›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · total bases · priced 16h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.27 → 20.00%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.27 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.6%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Kerry Carpenter›Kansas City Royals vs Detroit Tigers · total bases · priced 14h 38m before the gameUnder 1.5-170 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.64 → 1−0.36%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.59u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-170 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game14h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-195
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.64 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed63.3%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.59u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.36%
Masyn Winn›Arizona Diamondbacks vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 8h 11m before the gameUnder 1.5-200 at ESPN BETproj 0.82 → 0−0.83%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-200 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game8h 11m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190 on 0.5
Where our side closed-190
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.82 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed67.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.83%
Junior Caminero›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · hits · priced 11h 53m before the gameUnder 1.5-220 at ESPN BETproj 1.08 → 0−1.37%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.45u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-220 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 53m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-315
Where our side closed-210
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.08 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed68.8%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.45u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.37%
Byron Buxton›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 11h 11m before the gameOver 1.5+133 at Novigproj 1.93 → 1+0.11%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+133 at Novig
Locked before the game11h 11m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+135
Where our side closed+135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.93 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.0%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.11%
Chase DeLauter›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 13h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+136 at DraftKingsproj 2.16 → 0+1.71%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+136 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+130
Where our side closed+130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.16 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.71%
Kyle Manzardo›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 11h 1m before the gameOver 0.5-103 at BetOnlineproj 0.94 → 0+0.35%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-103 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h 1m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed-106
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.35%
Lars Nootbaar›Arizona Diamondbacks vs St. Louis Cardinals · total bases · priced 8h 6m before the gameUnder 1.5-200 at ESPN BETproj 1.03 → 2−2.38%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-200 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game8h 6m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180 on 0.5
Where our side closed-184
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.03 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed67.2%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.38%
Matt Olson›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · hits · priced 11h 45m before the gameOver 0.5-190 at ProphetXproj 1.02 → 0+1.48%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-190 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 45m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-240
Where our side closed-203
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.02 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed67.3%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.48%
Mauricio Dubon›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 12h 13m before the gameOver 1.5+190 at ProphetXproj 1.63 → 1+4.91%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+190 at ProphetX
Locked before the game12h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+190
Where our side closed+155
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.63 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed35.6%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.91%
Nathan Church›Arizona Diamondbacks vs St. Louis Cardinals · hits · priced 11h 13m before the gameUnder 0.5+140 at BetMGMproj 0.44 → 1−0.10%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+140 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+140
Where our side closed+141
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.44 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed41.8%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.10%
Travis Bazzana›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · hits · priced 15h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-145 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.89 → 0−0.17%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-145 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game15h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-145
Where our side closed-144
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.89 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.6%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.17%
Vladimir Guerrero Jr.›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 11h 58m before the gameUnder 1.5-114 at betPARXproj 1.32 → 2+3.99%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-114 at betPARX
Locked before the game11h 58m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-134
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.32 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed55.5%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.99%
Xander Bogaerts›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 10h 41m before the gameOver 0.5-145 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.06 → 0+2.31%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-145 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game10h 41m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.06 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jul 22Wed40−31+0.90urunning −5.54u4 voidprevious model
Seiya Suzuki›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 14h 3m before the gameOver 1.5+158proj 2.03 → 4+2.08%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.58u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+158 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+146 on 1
Where our side closed+144
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.03 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed39.3%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.58u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.08%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.22%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game40¢
With Kalshi’s fee42¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Heriberto Hernandez›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 16h 7m before the gameOver 1.5+140 at Hard Rock Betproj 2.02 → 3+0.99%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.40u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+140 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+110
Where our side closed+135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.02 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.4%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.40u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.99%
Kody Clemens›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 16h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+140proj 2.02 → 2+2.65%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.40u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+140 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+139
Where our side closed+127
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.02 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.7%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.40u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.65%
Andres Gimenez›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · hits · priced 11h 52m before the gameUnder 0.5+120 at ESPN BETproj 0.49 → 0+3.32%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.20u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+120 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 52m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+106
Where our side closed+108
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.49 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed45.7%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.20u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.32%
Fernando Tatis Jr.›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 15h 12m before the gameOver 1.5+120proj 1.91 → 3+1.46%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.20u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+120 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 12m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+120
Where our side closed+111
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.91 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed46.1%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.20u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.46%
Junior Caminero›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 10h 37m before the gameOver 1.5+115 at Novigproj 2.13 → 2−0.57%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.15u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+115 at Novig
Locked before the game10h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+105
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.13 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed46.7%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.15u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.57%
James Outman›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 16h 2m before the gameOver 0.5+110 at Fliffproj 0.59 → 10.00%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.10u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+110 at Fliff
Locked before the game16h 2m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-110
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.59 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+1.10u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish0.00%
Jase Bowen›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · hits · priced 15h 12m before the gameUnder 0.5+110 at Fliffproj 0.21 → 0−0.19%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.10u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+110 at Fliff
Locked before the game15h 12m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.21 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.0%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.10u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.19%
Basis
Yordan Alvarez›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 16h 7m before the gameOver 1.5+100 at Hard Rock Betproj 2.87 → 5+2.82%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+100 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.87 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed52.5%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.82%
Marcus Semien›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 11h 41m before the gameOver 0.5-103 at BetOnlineproj 1.04 → 4+1.61%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.97u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-103 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h 41m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed-112
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.04 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.5%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+0.97u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.61%
Jimmy Crooks›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · hits · priced 11h 3m before the gameUnder 0.5-112 at BetOnlineproj 0.41 → 0+1.41%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.89u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-112 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.41 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed53.0%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.89u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.41%
Petey Halpin›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 14h 37m before the gameOver 0.5-115 at BetOnlineproj 1.15 → 1−0.13%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.87u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-115 at BetOnline
Locked before the game14h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-103
Where our side closed-120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.15 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.8%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.87u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.13%
Ryan Waldschmidt›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · hits · priced 13h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-117 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.78 → 2+1.57%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.85u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-117 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game13h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160
Where our side closed-138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.78 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.1%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.85u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.57%
Jacob Gonzalez›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · hits · priced 15h 35m before the gameOver 0.5-125 at ProphetXproj 0.77 → 1not measurableno closing quote✓ Won+0.80u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-125 at ProphetX
Locked before the game15h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.77 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.8%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.80u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Exchange cross-check
Dalton Rushing›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · hits · priced 14h 36m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at ProphetXproj 0.6 → 2−0.69%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.77u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-130 at ProphetX
Locked before the game14h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.6 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.7%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.77u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.69%
Carlos Cortes›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 13h 38m before the gameUnder 1.5-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.13 → 0+2.99%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.74u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game13h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.13 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed60.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.74u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.99%
Bryson Stott›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 14h 36m before the gameOver 0.5-140 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.48 → 2not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.71u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-140 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game14h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-145
Where our side closed+175 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.48 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.2%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.71u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Taylor Ward›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 6h 51m before the gameUnder 1.5-141 at Novigproj 1.34 → 1−0.29%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.71u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-141 at Novig
Locked before the game6h 51m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.34 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed59.4%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.71u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.29%
Edmundo Sosa›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 16h 37m before the gameUnder 1.5-142 at ProphetXproj 1.01 → 0+2.49%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.70u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-142 at ProphetX
Locked before the game16h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-142
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.01 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed61.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.70u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.49%
Carson Benge›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 12h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-143 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.64 → 1+0.95%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.70u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-143 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-175
Where our side closed-141
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.64 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.70u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.95%
A.J. Ewing›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 11h 31m before the gameOver 0.5-149 at BetOnlineproj 1.75 → 3+0.09%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-149 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h 31m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-159
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.75 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.2%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.09%
Tim Tawa›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 11h 31m before the gameOver 0.5-149 at BetOnlineproj 1.31 → 3−2.61%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-149 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h 31m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.31 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.1%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.61%
Cal Raleigh›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 1.5-150 at ESPN BETproj 1.09 → 1+1.26%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-155 on 1
Where our side closed-164
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.09 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed60.4%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.26%
Ivan Herrera›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 12h 4m before the gameUnder 1.5-150 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.08 → 0+2.86%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 4m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-175
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.08 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed60.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Royce Lewis›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 14h 37m before the gameOver 0.5-150proj 1.44 → 1+0.54%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160 on 1
Where our side closed-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.44 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.6%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.54%
Braden Montgomery›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 16h 2m before the gameUnder 1.5-155 at Bovadaproj 1.47 → 1+1.06%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.65u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-155 at Bovada
Locked before the game16h 2m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.47 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed61.2%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.65u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.06%
Dominic Canzone›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 13h 38m before the gameUnder 1.5-155 at Caesarsproj 1.44 → 1−2.35%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.65u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-155 at Caesars
Locked before the game13h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170
Where our side closed-137
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.44 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed61.0%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.65u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.35%
Nathan Lukes›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 11h 28m before the gameUnder 1.5-155 at BetMGMproj 1.2 → 0+3.47%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.65u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-155 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 28m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed-175
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.2 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed61.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.65u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.47%
Tyler Stephenson›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 13h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-156proj 1.61 → 2−0.77%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.64u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-156 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-156 on 1
Where our side closed-152
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.61 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.1%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.64u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Victor Mesa Jr.›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 10h 43m before the gameOver 0.5-160 at ESPN BETproj 1.6 → 2−1.53%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.63u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-160 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game10h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-149
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.6 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.4%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.63u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.53%
Lane Thomas›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 12h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-162 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.04 → 1+2.45%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.62u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-162 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game12h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-180
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.04 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed65.0%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.62u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.45%
Isaac Paredes›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 16h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at ESPN BETproj 1.74 → 5not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game16h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed+152 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.74 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.6%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Jacob Young›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 11h 55m before the gameUnder 1.5-165 at ESPN BETproj 1.2 → 0+2.71%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 55m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190 on 0.5
Where our side closed-203
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.2 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.71%
Lawrence Butler›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 11h 36m before the gameUnder 1.5-180 at ESPN BETproj 0.85 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.56u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-180 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200
Where our side closed+125 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.85 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed64.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.56u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Chase DeLauter›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · hits · priced 16h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-188proj 1.27 → 1+3.07%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.53u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-188 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-220
Where our side closed-239
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.27 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed66.6%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.53u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.07%
Nick Gonzales›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · hits · priced 17h 40m before the gameOver 0.5-188 at ProphetXproj 1.38 → 2−2.22%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.53u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-188 at ProphetX
Locked before the game17h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-250
Where our side closed-196
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.38 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed69.9%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.53u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.22%
Daylen Lile›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · hits · priced 11h 55m before the gameUnder 1.5-190 at ESPN BETproj 0.9 → 0−2.01%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.53u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-190 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 55m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-224
Where our side closed-175
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.9 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed66.7%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.53u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.01%
Henry Bolte›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 11h 36m before the gameUnder 1.5-190 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.88 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.53u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-190 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game11h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed+155 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.88 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed66.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.53u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Leody Taveras›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 6h 16m before the gameUnder 1.5-200 at ESPN BETproj 0.96 → 0+0.25%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-200 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game6h 16m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180 on 0.5
Where our side closed-200
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.96 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed68.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.25%
Willson Contreras›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · hits · priced 9h 5m before the gameOver 0.5-200 at ESPN BETproj 1.13 → 2+2.56%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-200 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game9h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-245
Where our side closed-225
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.13 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed67.8%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.56%
Austin Wells›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · hits · priced 16h 45m before the gameUnder 0.5+110 at ESPN BETproj 0.43 → 1+1.21%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+110 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game16h 45m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-103
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.43 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.9%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.21%
Cole Young›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 13h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.54 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game13h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed+124 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.54 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Colt Keith›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 12h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-160 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.3 → 0+2.02%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-160 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game12h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-185
Where our side closed-180
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.3 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.02%
Cooper Pratt›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-118 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.36 → 0+2.29%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-118 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed-129
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.36 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.29%
Dillon Dingler›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 16h 2m before the gameOver 1.5+140 at Bovadaproj 2.12 → 1+3.85%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+140 at Bovada
Locked before the game16h 2m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+135
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.12 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.8%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.85%
Dylan Crews›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 11h 55m before the gameUnder 1.5-130 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.16 → 2−3.23%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game11h 55m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.16 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed57.2%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Elly De La Cruz›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 13h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+144 at Bovadaproj 2.21 → 0+4.43%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+144 at Bovada
Locked before the game13h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+145
Where our side closed+125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.21 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.43%
Ernie Clement›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 15h 4m before the gameOver 1.5+120 at Bovadaproj 1.62 → 0−2.56%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+120 at Bovada
Locked before the game15h 4m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+120
Where our side closed+138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.62 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.56%
Esmerlyn Valdez›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · hits · priced 17h 40m before the gameOver 0.5-140 at ProphetXproj 1.13 → 0+0.34%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-140 at ProphetX
Locked before the game17h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed-156
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.13 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.3%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.34%
Hunter Goodman›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 13h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+100 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 2.25 → 10.00%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+100 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game13h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.25 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.8%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Isaac Collins›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 12h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-129 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.91 → 0+5.65%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-129 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-155
Where our side closed-163
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.91 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.9%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+5.65%
Jake Bauers›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 16h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-115 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.58 → 0−0.52%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-115 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game16h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-115
Where our side closed-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.58 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.52%
James Wood›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 11h 7m before the gameOver 1.5-130 at DraftKingsproj 2.69 → 0+2.04%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at DraftKings
Locked before the game11h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.69 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed56.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.04%
Jazz Chisholm Jr.›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · hits · priced 17h 40m before the gameOver 0.5-168 at ProphetXproj 0.84 → 0+0.07%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-168 at ProphetX
Locked before the game17h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-195
Where our side closed-179
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.84 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.2%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.07%
Kerry Carpenter›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · hits · priced 14h 3m before the gameUnder 0.5+115 at DraftKingsproj 0.39 → 1−1.90%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+115 at DraftKings
Locked before the game14h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+111
Where our side closed+125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.39 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed46.8%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.90%
Kyle Schwarber›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 16h 37m before the gameOver 1.5+115 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.7 → 10.00%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+115 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game16h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.7 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed46.8%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Michael Harris II›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 15h 12m before the gameOver 1.5+120proj 2.41 → 0+0.61%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+120 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 12m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+120
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.41 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Miguel Vargas›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 16h 2m before the gameOver 1.5+115 at Caesarsproj 1.92 → 0+1.53%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+115 at Caesars
Locked before the game16h 2m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+112
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.92 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.53%
Mike Yastrzemski›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 15h 12m before the gameOver 0.5-120proj 1.07 → 0−0.27%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-120 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 12m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.07 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.27%
Nolan Schanuel›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · hits · priced 11h 28m before the gameOver 0.5-222 at BetOnlineproj 1.22 → 0+0.65%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-222 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h 28m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-300
Where our side closed-245
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.22 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed69.3%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.65%
Otto Lopez›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 16h 7m before the gameOver 1.5+125 at Hard Rock Betproj 2.4 → 1+0.85%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+125 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+110
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.4 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.6%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.85%
Pete Alonso›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 6h 26m before the gameUnder 1.5-124 at betPARXproj 1.48 → 3+3.66%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-124 at betPARX
Locked before the game6h 26m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160
Where our side closed-144
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.48 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed55.6%
Actual3 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.66%
Travis Bazzana›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · hits · priced 16h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-168proj 0.97 → 0+0.14%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-168 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-220
Where our side closed-178
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.97 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed66.0%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.14%
Trea Turner›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 16h 37m before the gameOver 1.5+105 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 2.09 → 0+0.95%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+105 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game16h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.09 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed49.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Tristan Peters›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 18h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-144 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.55 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-144 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game18h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed+175 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.55 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Ty France›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 15h 12m before the gameOver 1.5+135proj 2.27 → 0+0.97%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+135 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 12m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+135
Where our side closed+128
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.27 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.97%
Tyler Tolbert›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 11h 41m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at BetOnlineproj 1.22 → 0−2.68%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h 41m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-270 on 1.5
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.22 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.68%
Vinnie Pasquantino›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameUnder 1.5-165 at Bovadaproj 1.23 → 2−0.19%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at Bovada
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.23 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.3%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.19%
Wilyer Abreu›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 6h 26m before the gameOver 1.5+110 at ESPN BETproj 2.11 → 0−2.07%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+110 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game6h 26m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed+111
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.11 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed48.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.07%
Wyatt Langford›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · hits · priced 16h 2m before the gameOver 0.5-220 at DraftKingsproj 1.31 → 0+0.08%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-220 at DraftKings
Locked before the game16h 2m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-272
Where our side closed-220
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.31 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed69.5%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.08%
Yainer Diaz›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 11h 36m before the gameOver 1.5+175 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.6 → 0+1.03%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+175 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game11h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170 on 0.5
Where our side closed+170
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.6 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed37.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.03%
Jac Caglianone›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 12h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-184 at ProphetXproj 0.93+2.88%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-184 at ProphetX
Locked before the game12h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-184
Where our side closed-244
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.93 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed66.2%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jorge Soler›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 10h 52m before the gameUnder 1.5-164 at DraftKingsproj 1.03not measurablethe book moved the lineDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-164 at DraftKings
Locked before the game10h 52m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180 on 0.5
Where our side closed+130 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.03 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.1%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Logan O'Hoppe›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · hits · priced 12h 4m before the gameUnder 0.5+142 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.5+1.81%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+142 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 4m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+130
Where our side closed+125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.5 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed41.4%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Luisangel Acuna›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · hits · priced 16h 2m before the gameOver 0.5-125 at DraftKingsproj 0.61not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-125 at DraftKings
Locked before the game16h 2m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-147
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.61 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.1%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Jul 21Tue24−33−11.72urunning −6.44u18 voidprevious model
Chandler Simpson›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 19h 5m before the gameOver 1.5+184 at ProphetXproj 1.59 → 4+0.56%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.84u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+184 at ProphetX
Locked before the game19h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+184
Where our side closed+174
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.59 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed35.9%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.84u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.56%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.29%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.29%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.29% = +1.29%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.56% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Manny Machado›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 19h 13m before the gameOver 1.5+148 at ProphetXproj 1.69 → 8+2.83%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.48u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+148 at ProphetX
Locked before the game19h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+148
Where our side closed+130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.69 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed40.8%
Actual8 total bases
Settled+1.48u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.83%
Oswald Peraza›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · hits · priced 15h 36m before the gameUnder 0.5+125 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.49 → 0+0.09%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.25u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+125 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game15h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+125
Where our side closed+130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.49 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed46.2%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.25u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.09%
Wyatt Langford›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 16h 3m before the gameOver 1.5+125proj 2.38 → 5+2.09%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.25u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+125 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+125
Where our side closed+115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.38 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.2%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+1.25u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.09%
David Fry›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · hits · priced 16h 38m before the gameUnder 0.5+115proj 0.28 → 0+4.23%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.15u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+115 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed-103
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.28 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed47.8%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.15u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.23%
Michael Harris II›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 17h 13m before the gameOver 1.5+114 at BetOnlineproj 2.37 → 2+2.22%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.14u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+114 at BetOnline
Locked before the game17h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-108
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.37 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed51.1%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.14u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.22%
Junior Caminero›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 17h 5m before the gameOver 1.5+112 at DraftKingsproj 2.21 → 2+1.85%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.12u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+112 at DraftKings
Locked before the game17h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+117
Where our side closed+105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.21 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.5%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.12u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.85%
Drew Romo›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · hits · priced 16h 3m before the gameUnder 0.5+100 at Fliffproj 0.28 → 0−2.22%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+100 at Fliff
Locked before the game16h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed+112
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.28 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed50.5%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.22%
Basis
Kevin Alcantara›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · hits · priced 16h 3m before the gameUnder 0.5-110 at DraftKingsproj 0.25 → 0+3.64%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.91u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-110 at DraftKings
Locked before the game16h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-126
Where our side closed-127
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.25 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.2%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.91u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.64%
Yordan Alvarez›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 16h 8m before the gameOver 1.5-115 at Fliffproj 3.03 → 2−0.89%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.87u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took-115 at Fliff
Locked before the game16h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
Where our side closed-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection3.03 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed54.4%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.87u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.89%
Ezequiel Tovar›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 16h 38m before the gameUnder 1.5-130 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.96 → 0−0.07%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.77u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-145
Where our side closed-120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.96 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed57.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.77u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.07%
Isaac Collins›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 15h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.54 → 1+1.23%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.77u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game15h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-155
Where our side closed-148
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.54 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.5%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.77u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
James Wood›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 16h 38m before the gameOver 1.5-130 at Hard Rock Betproj 2.69 → 4not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.77u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
Where our side closed+110 on 2.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.69 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed58.4%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+0.77u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Jake McCarthy›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 14h 38m before the gameOver 1.5-132 at Hard Rock Betproj 2.17 → 3−1.54%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.76u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took-132 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game14h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160
Where our side closed-124
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.17 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed57.4%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+0.76u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.54%
Jared Young›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 15h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-135 at Fliffproj 1.05 → 5−2.77%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.74u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at Fliff
Locked before the game15h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-185
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.05 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.2%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+0.74u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.77%
Griffin Conine›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 16h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-140proj 1.55 → 2−3.02%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.71u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-140 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140 on 1
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.55 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.6%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.71u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.02%
Troy Johnston›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 14h 38m before the gameUnder 1.5-140 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.84 → 1−0.17%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.71u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-140 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game14h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed-139
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.84 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed58.9%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.71u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.17%
Cooper Pratt›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · hits · priced 17h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-142 at Fliffproj 0.93 → 1+0.55%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.70u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-142 at Fliff
Locked before the game17h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.93 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.2%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.70u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.55%
Bryson Stott›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 14h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-145 at BetOnlineproj 1.52 → 1not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.69u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-145 at BetOnline
Locked before the game14h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-156
Where our side closed+204 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.52 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.7%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.69u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
A.J. Ewing›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · hits · priced 17h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-174 at Fliffproj 1.02 → 1+1.89%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.57u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-174 at Fliff
Locked before the game17h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-230
Where our side closed-172
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.02 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.3%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.57u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.89%
Basis
Travis Bazzana›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · hits · priced 16h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-176proj 0.93 → 1−0.82%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.57u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-176 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-176
Where our side closed-170
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.93 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed66.3%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.57u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.82%
Jake Rogers›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 16h 3m before the gameUnder 1.5-180 at ReBetproj 1.03 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.56u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-180 at ReBet
Locked before the game16h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180 on 0.5
Where our side closed+100 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.03 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed65.6%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.56u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Alex Bregman›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · hits · priced 16h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-200 at DraftKingsproj 0.94 → 1−3.33%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-200 at DraftKings
Locked before the game16h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-259
Where our side closed-170
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed66.9%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.33%
Casey Schmitt›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 1.5-225 at ProphetXproj 1.04 → 0+1.39%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.44u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-225 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-250
Where our side closed-250
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.04 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed69.7%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.44u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.39%
Alec Bohm›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 16h 38m before the gameUnder 1.5-130 at Fliffproj 1.45 → 4+2.61%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at Fliff
Locked before the game16h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed-155
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.45 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed57.9%
Actual4 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.61%
Austin Riley›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 19h 13m before the gameOver 1.5+182 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.6 → 0+6.22%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+182 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game19h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165 on 0.5
Where our side closed+135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.6 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed35.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Brandon Nimmo›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 14h 3m before the gameUnder 1.5-130proj 1.48 → 7+3.69%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-130 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160
Where our side closed-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.48 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed57.7%
Actual7 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.69%
Brice Turang›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 15h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+140 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.95 → 0−2.05%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+140 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game15h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+130
Where our side closed+147
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.95 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.05%
Byron Buxton›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 14h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+123proj 2.06 → 1+2.38%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+123 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+123
Where our side closed+108
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.06 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.6%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.38%
Chase Meidroth›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 14h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-155 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.28 → 0+1.51%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-155 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game14h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160
Where our side closed-173
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.28 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Cole Young›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 15h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-140proj 1.58 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-140 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140 on 1
Where our side closed+164 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.58 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Derek Hill›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 18h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at BetOnlineproj 1.17 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at BetOnline
Locked before the game18h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
Where our side closed+199 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.17 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Geraldo Perdomo›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 13h 37m before the gameUnder 1.5-160 at ESPN BETproj 1.26 → 2+0.97%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-160 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game13h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.26 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.0%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.97%
Jac Caglianone›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameOver 1.5+120 at BetMGMproj 1.74 → 0−0.36%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+120 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.74 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.36%
Jacob Wilson›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 13h 37m before the gameOver 1.5+111 at Fliffproj 1.91 → 0+1.34%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+111 at Fliff
Locked before the game13h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.91 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.34%
Jonah Heim›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · hits · priced 13h 37m before the gameOver 0.5-175 at ProphetXproj 0.78 → 0−0.13%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-175 at ProphetX
Locked before the game13h 37m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-270
Where our side closed-174
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.78 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.7%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.13%
Jorge Soler›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 13h 35m before the gameUnder 1.5-165 at Fliffproj 0.98 → 2−0.90%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at Fliff
Locked before the game13h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.98 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.4%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.90%
Jose Altuve›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+182 at Fliffproj 1.83 → 0+3.73%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+182 at Fliff
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+135
Where our side closed+155
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.83 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed37.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.73%
Jose Siri›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · hits · priced 13h 35m before the gameUnder 0.5+100 at ESPN BETproj 0.35 → 2−0.62%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+100 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game13h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-110
Where our side closed+105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.35 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.0%
Actual2 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.62%
Josh Jung›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 16h 3m before the gameOver 1.5+140 at Fliffproj 1.8 → 1+1.30%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+140 at Fliff
Locked before the game16h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed+133
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.8 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.9%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.30%
Juan Soto›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 17h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+130 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.73 → 0+1.36%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+130 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game17h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.73 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.6%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.36%
Kazuma Okamoto›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · hits · priced 17h 5m before the gameOver 0.5-118 at DraftKingsproj 0.73 → 0+4.20%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-118 at DraftKings
Locked before the game17h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-143
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.73 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.3%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.20%
Kyle Schwarber›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 14h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+120 at Fliffproj 1.71 → 0−1.04%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+120 at Fliff
Locked before the game14h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.71 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.04%
Lane Thomas›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 13h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+144proj 2.04 → 0+2.01%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+144 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+125
Where our side closed+133
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.04 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.01%
Luke Raley›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 17h 38m before the gameOver 0.5+100 at BetOnlineproj 1.09 → 0+0.60%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+100 at BetOnline
Locked before the game17h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-108
Where our side closed-105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.09 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed52.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.60%
Matt Olson›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 19h 13m before the gameOver 1.5+126 at BetOnlineproj 2.23 → 1+2.07%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+126 at BetOnline
Locked before the game19h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+126
Where our side closed+122
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.23 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.5%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.07%
Matt Vierling›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 18h 3m before the gameUnder 1.5-154 at Caesarsproj 0.91 → 2+3.84%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-154 at Caesars
Locked before the game18h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-197
Where our side closed-194
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.91 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed64.5%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.84%
Michael Busch›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 18h 3m before the gameOver 1.5+166 at DraftKingsproj 1.92 → 1−3.34%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+166 at DraftKings
Locked before the game18h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+141
Where our side closed+195
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.92 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed37.7%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.34%
Mike Trout›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 15h 36m before the gameOver 1.5+134 at Fliffproj 1.95 → 1+2.41%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+134 at Fliff
Locked before the game15h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+110
Where our side closed+125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.95 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.8%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.41%
Nick Loftin›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 13h 38m before the gameUnder 1.5-170proj 1.24 → 2+3.98%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-170 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170
Where our side closed-195
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.24 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed63.3%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.98%
Otto Lopez›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+136proj 2.41 → 0+3.41%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+136 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+122
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.41 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.41%
Petey Halpin›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 14h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-143 at Fliffproj 1.16 → 0−0.69%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-143 at Fliff
Locked before the game14h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-175
Where our side closed-141
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.16 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.69%
Randy Arozarena›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · hits · priced 17h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-160 at BetOnlineproj 1.05 → 0+1.68%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-160 at BetOnline
Locked before the game17h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-182
Where our side closed-175
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.05 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.1%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.68%
Shea Langeliers›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 15h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+110 at Fliffproj 1.72 → 0+1.16%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+110 at Fliff
Locked before the game15h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed+105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.72 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed49.6%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.16%
Taylor Walls›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · hits · priced 15h 5m before the gameOver 0.5+107 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.7 → 0+2.69%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took+107 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game15h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-115
Where our side closed-102
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.7 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.8%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.69%
Trea Turner›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 18h 38m before the gameOver 1.5+117 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 2.29 → 1+2.68%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+117 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game18h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+105
Where our side closed+105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.29 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed46.4%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Xander Bogaerts›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 15h 13m before the gameUnder 1.5-190 at Caesarsproj 1.01 → 2not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-190 at Caesars
Locked before the game15h 13m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-197
Where our side closed+130 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.01 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed65.7%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Ben Rice›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · hits · priced 17h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-190 at ProphetXproj 1.18+1.93%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-190 at ProphetX
Locked before the game17h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-270
Where our side closed-210
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.18 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed68.4%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Brooks Lee›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 14h 38m before the gameOver 0.5-149 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.43+5.68%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-149 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game14h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed-190
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.43 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.5%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Buddy Kennedy›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · hits · priced 19h 38m before the gameUnder 0.5-132 at BetOnlineproj 0.09−0.95%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-132 at BetOnline
Locked before the game19h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-132
Where our side closed-127
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.09 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.6%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Coby Mayo›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 15h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-125proj 1.28−3.17%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-125 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
Where our side closed-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.28 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.9%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Cody Bellinger›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · hits · priced 17h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-180 at ProphetXproj 0.94+1.13%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-180 at ProphetX
Locked before the game17h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-255
Where our side closed-185
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed67.1%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Colby Thomas›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · hits · priced 15h 38m before the gameUnder 0.5+118 at Fliffproj 0.45not measurableno closing quotePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+118 at Fliff
Locked before the game15h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.45 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed45.9%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Denzer Guzman›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 17h 36m before the gameOver 0.5-143 at Fliffproj 1.16+1.27%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-143 at Fliff
Locked before the game17h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170
Where our side closed-167
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.16 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.7%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Dylan Crews›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · hits · priced 14h 38m before the gameUnder 1.5-213 at Fliffproj 0.67−1.27%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-213 at Fliff
Locked before the game14h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-213 on 0.5
Where our side closed-225
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.67 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed69.6%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jared Triolo›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 13h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-135 at BetOnlineproj 1.23+2.50%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at BetOnline
Locked before the game13h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.23 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.7%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jeremiah Jackson›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 13h 8m before the gameUnder 1.5-194proj 0.9not measurableno closing quotePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-194 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-194
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.9 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed67.2%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Jonatan Clase›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 15h 5m before the gameOver 0.5+120 at BetOnlineproj 1.33+3.69%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+120 at BetOnline
Locked before the game15h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-103
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.33 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.8%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Ke'Bryan Hayes›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · hits · priced 19h 38m before the gameUnder 0.5-102 at BetOnlineproj 0.4+0.60%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-102 at BetOnline
Locked before the game19h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-102
Where our side closed-108
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.4 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.1%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Nick Gonzales›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 15h 3m before the gameOver 1.5+158proj 2.01+1.72%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+158 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+145
Where our side closed+145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.01 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed40.4%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Ryan McMahon›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · hits · priced 11h 55m before the gameOver 0.5-115 at BetMGMproj 0.63+1.64%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-115 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 55m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.63 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.3%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Sam Huff›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · hits · priced 17h 8m before the gameUnder 0.5-115 at Fliffproj 0.36+1.67%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-115 at Fliff
Locked before the game17h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed-123
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.36 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.6%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Tyler O'Neill›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 15h 8m before the gameUnder 1.5-170proj 1.34not measurablethe book moved the linePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-170 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game15h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170 on 1
Where our side closed+130 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.34 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed64.5%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Willson Contreras›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 17h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+150 at Fliffproj 2.39+2.31%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+150 at Fliff
Locked before the game17h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed+133
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.39 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.1%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Yainer Diaz›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+178 at Fliffproj 1.6+1.87%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+178 at Fliff
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+140
Where our side closed+153
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.6 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed36.1%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jul 20Mon34−35−5.37urunning +5.28u6 voidprevious model
Dansby Swanson›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 14h 34m before the gameOver 1.5+167 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.96 → 2+4.33%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+167 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game14h 34m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+140
Where our side closed+133
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.96 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed37.9%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.33%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+5.47%
…of which: waiting paid+4.21%
…of which: market drift+1.25%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.21% + +1.25% = +5.47%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +4.33% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Ty France›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 17h 15m before the gameOver 1.5+146 at DraftKingsproj 2 → 5+3.10%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.46u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+146 at DraftKings
Locked before the game17h 15m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+140
Where our side closed+127
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.0%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+1.46u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.10%
Jordan Walker›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 14h 9m before the gameOver 1.5+140 at Novigproj 2.13 → 2+1.00%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.40u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+140 at Novig
Locked before the game14h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+130
Where our side closed+135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.13 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.1%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.40u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.00%
Lane Thomas›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 17h 40m before the gameOver 1.5+132 at Novigproj 2.04 → 2−0.06%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.32u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+132 at Novig
Locked before the game17h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+122
Where our side closed+138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.04 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.1%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.32u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.06%
Seiya Suzuki›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 12h 33m before the gameOver 1.5+125 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 2.06 → 4+0.96%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.25u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+125 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game12h 33m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+110
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.06 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.7%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.25u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.96%
Michael Harris II›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 17h 15m before the gameOver 1.5+117 at DraftKingsproj 2.24 → 4−1.20%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.17u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+117 at DraftKings
Locked before the game17h 15m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+111
Where our side closed+122
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.24 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.1%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.17u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.20%
Colby Thomas›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · hits · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 0.5+115 at betPARXproj 0.45 → 0+1.40%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.15u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+115 at betPARX
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+105
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.45 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed47.7%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.15u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.40%
Jackson Holliday›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · hits · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 0.5+115 at BetMGMproj 0.5 → 0not measurableno closing quote✓ Won+1.15u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+115 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+108
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.5 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.8%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.15u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Wilyer Abreu›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 17h 10m before the gameOver 1.5+115 at DraftKingsproj 2.02 → 3+4.86%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.15u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+115 at DraftKings
Locked before the game17h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+111
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.02 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed46.5%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.15u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.86%
Taylor Walls›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 17h 7m before the gameOver 0.5+110 at Fliffproj 0.82 → 3−2.04%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.10u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+110 at Fliff
Locked before the game17h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.82 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed49.2%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.10u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.04%
Braxton Fulford›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · hits · priced 18h 40m before the gameUnder 0.5+109 at DraftKingsproj 0.24 → 0−6.18%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.09u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+109 at DraftKings
Locked before the game18h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed+140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.24 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed49.5%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.09u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−6.18%
Willson Contreras›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 17h 10m before the gameOver 1.5+109 at DraftKingsproj 2.22 → 4+1.73%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.09u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+109 at DraftKings
Locked before the game17h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-103
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.22 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed48.2%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.09u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.73%
Cedric Mullins›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 13h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-108 at Fliffproj 1.25 → 4+0.74%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.93u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-108 at Fliff
Locked before the game13h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.25 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed52.5%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+0.93u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.74%
Griffin Conine›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 14h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-112proj 1.71 → 1+2.90%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.89u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-112 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-112
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.71 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.89u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.90%
Francisco Lindor›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 19h 40m before the gameOver 0.5-115 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.52 → 1+2.98%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.87u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-115 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game19h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed-129
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.52 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed53.7%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.87u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Tristan Peters›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 14h 5m before the gameOver 0.5-115 at BetMGMproj 1.59 → 2−0.62%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.87u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-115 at BetMGM
Locked before the game14h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-115
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.59 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.9%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.87u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.62%
Andrew Benintendi›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 14h 5m before the gameOver 0.5-125 at BetMGMproj 1.41 → 2+0.71%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.80u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-125 at BetMGM
Locked before the game14h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed-132
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.41 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.9%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.80u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.71%
Kerry Carpenter›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 18h 34m before the gameUnder 1.5-130 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.85 → 0+0.92%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.77u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game18h 34m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.85 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed58.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.77u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.92%
J.T. Realmuto›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 13h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-143 at BetOnlineproj 1.35 → 1+2.29%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.70u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-143 at BetOnline
Locked before the game13h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-149
Where our side closed-162
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.35 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.2%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.70u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.29%
James Wood›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · hits · priced 14h 40m before the gameUnder 1.5-144 at DraftKingsproj 1.22 → 1+2.52%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.69u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-144 at DraftKings
Locked before the game14h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-176
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.22 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.0%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.69u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.52%
Tyler Freeman›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 14h 40m before the gameUnder 1.5-145 at DraftKingsproj 0.84 → 1+2.90%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.69u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-145 at DraftKings
Locked before the game14h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-177
Where our side closed-175
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.84 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed61.5%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.69u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.90%
Heriberto Hernandez›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 12h 9m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at ESPN BETproj 2.02 → 1not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game12h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed+141 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.02 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.3%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Lars Nootbaar›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 16h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-150proj 1.09 → 1−0.16%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150 on 1
Where our side closed-156
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.09 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.3%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Bryson Stott›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameOver 0.5-155 at BetMGMproj 1.47 → 3not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.65u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-155 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160 on 1
Where our side closed+155 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.47 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.2%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+0.65u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Esmerlyn Valdez›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · hits · priced 13h 5m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.17 → 1+0.81%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-165 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game13h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-175
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.17 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.0%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.81%
Matt Vierling›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 14h 34m before the gameUnder 1.5-165 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.91 → 0+1.30%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game14h 34m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-195
Where our side closed-185
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.91 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.30%
Daulton Varsho›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 13h 7m before the gameUnder 1.5-175 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.88 → 1+0.86%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.57u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-175 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game13h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-185
Where our side closed-180
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.88 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed65.0%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.57u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.86%
Ryan Waldschmidt›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 1.5-175 at BetMGMproj 1.06 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.57u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-175 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165 on 1
Where our side closed+130 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.06 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed65.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.57u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Ezequiel Duran›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 12h 4m before the gameOver 0.5-180 at ESPN BETproj 1.62 → 2not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.56u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-180 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game12h 4m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed+175 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.62 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed65.2%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.56u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Caleb Durbin›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · hits · priced 11h 56m before the gameOver 0.5-190 at BetMGMproj 0.87 → 1+2.67%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.53u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-190 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-250
Where our side closed-210
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.87 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed66.7%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.53u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.67%
Heliot Ramos›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 13h 40m before the gameUnder 1.5-200 at DraftKingsproj 1.19 → 1+1.86%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-200 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-228
Where our side closed-220
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.19 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed66.7%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.86%
Jung Hoo Lee›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 1.5-200 at ESPN BETproj 0.94 → 1+1.11%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-200 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-220
Where our side closed-220
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed66.7%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.11%
Nick Gonzales›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · hits · priced 13h 5m before the gameOver 0.5-200 at DraftKingsproj 1.38 → 1+1.93%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-200 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-253
Where our side closed-237
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.38 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed68.3%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.93%
Steven Kwan›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 16h 40m before the gameUnder 1.5-200proj 1.36 → 0−2.14%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-200 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200 on 1
Where our side closed-190
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.36 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed67.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.14%
A.J. Ewing›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 17h 40m before the gameOver 0.5-103proj 1.77 → 0+3.91%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-103 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game17h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-103 on 1
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.77 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.91%
AndréS Chaparro›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 20h 40m before the gameUnder 1.5-170 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 0.98 → 4−8.98%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-170 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game20h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170
Where our side closed-111
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.98 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed63.3%
Actual4 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Austin Wells›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · hits · priced 17h 5m before the gameUnder 0.5-130 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.34 → 2−1.09%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-130 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game17h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed-128
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.34 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.0%
Actual2 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.09%
Ben Rice›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 13h 5m before the gameOver 1.5+115 at DraftKingsproj 2.65 → 1−1.12%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+115 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+114
Where our side closed+118
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.65 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.0%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.12%
Brandon Marsh›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 1.5-160 at BetMGMproj 1.14 → 4−0.69%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-160 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-155
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.14 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.3%
Actual4 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.69%
Bryce Harper›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 1.5-145 at BetMGMproj 1.21 → 4−1.28%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-145 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.21 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed59.5%
Actual4 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.28%
Coby Mayo›Baltimore Orioles vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 13h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-140proj 1.29 → 0not measurableno closing quote✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-140 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140 on 1
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.29 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Denzer Guzman›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 14h 9m before the gameOver 0.5-145proj 1.22 → 0+0.39%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-145 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-156 on 1
Where our side closed-143
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.22 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Dillon Dingler›Detroit Tigers vs Chicago Cubs · hits · priced 12h 33m before the gameUnder 1.5-200 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.87 → 4not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-200 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game12h 33m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-225
Where our side closed+200 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.87 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed67.3%
Actual4 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Drake Baldwin›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 17h 15m before the gameOver 1.5+102 at DraftKingsproj 2.07 → 0−3.63%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+102 at DraftKings
Locked before the game17h 15m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-114
Where our side closed+118
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.07 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.63%
Jac Caglianone›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 13h 40m before the gameOver 1.5+105 at DraftKingsproj 1.75 → 0−1.25%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+105 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-103
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.75 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.25%
Jacob Wilson›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · hits · priced 13h 39m before the gameUnder 1.5-190 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.19 → 2−0.94%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-190 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game13h 39m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-210
Where our side closed-190
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.19 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed65.5%
Actual2 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.94%
Jacob Young›Washington Nationals vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 18h 40m before the gameUnder 1.5-137 at DraftKingsproj 0.98 → 6−2.25%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-137 at DraftKings
Locked before the game18h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-191
Where our side closed-125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.98 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed59.1%
Actual6 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.25%
Jake Bauers›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · hits · priced 17h 40m before the gameOver 0.5-120 at DraftKingsproj 0.79 → 0−0.48%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-120 at DraftKings
Locked before the game17h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-138
Where our side closed-120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.79 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.8%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.48%
Jake Burger›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 14h 5m before the gameUnder 1.5-165 at ESPN BETproj 1.17 → 4+0.96%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game14h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-180
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.17 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.5%
Actual4 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.96%
Jorge Barrosa›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 15h 40m before the gameUnder 0.5+100 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.31 → 2−2.15%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 total bases
Price we took+100 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game15h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.31 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed50.5%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Juan Soto›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 13h 40m before the gameOver 0.5-130proj 1.74 → 0+0.21%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-130 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.74 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.21%
Ke'Bryan Hayes›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · hits · priced 19h 40m before the gameUnder 0.5+135 at Fliffproj 0.43 → 1+5.13%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+135 at Fliff
Locked before the game19h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.43 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed43.7%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+5.13%
Kyle Manzardo›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · hits · priced 16h 40m before the gameUnder 0.5+110proj 0.46 → 1+2.13%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+110 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed+101
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.46 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.3%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.13%
Matt Olson›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 17h 15m before the gameOver 1.5+112 at Hard Rock Betproj 2.24 → 0−0.58%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+112 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game17h 15m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed+117
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.24 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed48.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.58%
Mike Trout›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 14h 9m before the gameOver 1.5+126 at Hard Rock Betproj 2 → 0+0.11%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+126 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game14h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.11%
Nathan Church›St. Louis Cardinals vs Los Angeles Angels · hits · priced 16h 10m before the gameUnder 0.5+136 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 0.48 → 2−1.35%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+136 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game16h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+130
Where our side closed+140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.48 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed42.5%
Actual2 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.35%
Nathan Lukes›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 13h 7m before the gameUnder 1.5-160 at Caesarsproj 1.27 → 2−0.33%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-160 at Caesars
Locked before the game13h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-179
Where our side closed-156
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.27 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.2%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.33%
Petey Halpin›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · hits · priced 16h 40m before the gameUnder 0.5-111 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.48 → 3−3.65%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-111 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.48 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.6%
Actual3 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.65%
Rafael Devers›San Francisco Giants vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 11h 16m before the gameOver 1.5+110 at ESPN BETproj 2.04 → 1−0.58%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+110 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 16m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+110
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.04 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed48.2%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.58%
Richie Palacios›Tampa Bay Rays vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 17h 7m before the gameOver 0.5+112 at Fliffproj 1.11 → 0+3.51%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+112 at Fliff
Locked before the game17h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed+105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.11 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.51%
Sal Stewart›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 15h 40m before the gameOver 1.5+128 at Hard Rock Betproj 2.13 → 0−0.59%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+128 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game15h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.13 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.59%
Shohei Ohtani›Los Angeles Dodgers vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameOver 1.5+138 at Novigproj 2.15 → 0+1.07%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+138 at Novig
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+120
Where our side closed+130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.15 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.07%
Taylor Trammell›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · hits · priced 14h 10m before the gameUnder 0.5-115 at DraftKingsproj 0.43 → 1−2.67%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-115 at DraftKings
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-133
Where our side closed-105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.43 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.1%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.67%
Tim Tawa›Athletics vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 13h 39m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at ESPN BETproj 1.28 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game13h 39m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed+150 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.28 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Trent Grisham›Pittsburgh Pirates vs New York Yankees · hits · priced 13h 5m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 0.83 → 0−0.71%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-165 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game13h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-185
Where our side closed-170
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.83 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.5%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.71%
Victor Robles›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · hits · priced 13h 39m before the gameUnder 0.5+125 at DraftKingsproj 0.39 → 4−0.75%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+125 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 39m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.39 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed47.1%
Actual4 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.75%
Weston Wilson›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · hits · priced 19h 40m before the gameUnder 0.5-109 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.33 → 1+2.39%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-109 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game19h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
Where our side closed-120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.33 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed53.3%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.39%
Wyatt Langford›Chicago White Sox vs Texas Rangers · total bases · priced 12h 4m before the gameOver 1.5+126 at Hard Rock Betproj 2.63 → 1−0.43%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+126 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game12h 4m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+120
Where our side closed+130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.63 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.4%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.43%
Xavier Edwards›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · hits · priced 12h 9m before the gameOver 0.5-190 at DraftKingsproj 1.12 → 00.00%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-190 at DraftKings
Locked before the game12h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-207
Where our side closed-190
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.12 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed65.7%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish0.00%
Carson Benge›New York Mets vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 13h 40m before the gameOver 0.5-115 at Fliffproj 1.55not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-115 at Fliff
Locked before the game13h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.55 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.7%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Gabriel Arias›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 12h 40m before the gameOver 0.5-105proj 1.27+5.68%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-105 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game12h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
Where our side closed-132
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.27 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed52.7%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jorge Mateo›San Diego Padres vs Atlanta Braves · hits · priced 13h 15m before the gameUnder 0.5+115 at DraftKingsproj 0.32not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+115 at DraftKings
Locked before the game13h 15m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.32 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.5%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Luke Keaschall›Minnesota Twins vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 12h 40m before the gameOver 0.5-165proj 1.43not measurablethe book moved the lineDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game12h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-169 on 1
Where our side closed+186 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.43 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.0%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Otto Lopez›Miami Marlins vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 12h 9m before the gameOver 1.5+134 at DraftKingsproj 2.41+0.72%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+134 at DraftKings
Locked before the game12h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+141
Where our side closed+122
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.41 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.2%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
TJ Friedl›Cincinnati Reds vs Seattle Mariners · hits · priced 19h 40m before the gameUnder 0.5-115 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.46−3.78%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-115 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game19h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed-105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.46 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.3%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jul 19Sun38−32+4.98urunning +10.65u5 voidprevious model
Cole Young›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 14h 10m before the gameOver 1.5+190proj 1.81 → 5+1.54%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.90u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+190 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+190 on 1
Where our side closed+180
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.81 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed35.8%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+1.90u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.54%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.23%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Chase DeLauter›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 11h 55m before the gameOver 1.5+171 at BetOnlineproj 2.1 → 2+3.25%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.71u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+171 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h 55m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+133
Where our side closed+150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.1 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed38.7%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.71u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.25%
Nolan Arenado›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 14h 10m before the gameOver 1.5+170 at DraftKingsproj 1.73 → 4−1.68%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.70u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+170 at DraftKings
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+144
Where our side closed+178
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.73 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed37.8%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.70u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.68%
Seiya Suzuki›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 12h 20m before the gameOver 1.5+155proj 2.02 → 2+1.58%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.55u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+155 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game12h 20m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+130
Where our side closed+141
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.02 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed40.4%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.55u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.58%
Joc Pederson›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 13h 35m before the gameOver 1.5+135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.74 → 3+0.13%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.35u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game13h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-195 on 0.5
Where our side closed+135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.74 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.0%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.35u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.13%
Trea Turner›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 10h 31m before the gameOver 1.5+135 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 2.01 → 2−0.83%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.35u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+135 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game10h 31m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+120
Where our side closed+141
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.01 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.8%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.35u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.83%
Nelson Velazquez›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · hits · priced 12h 10m before the gameUnder 0.5+134 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.47 → 0−1.85%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.34u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+134 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game12h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.47 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed44.0%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.34u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.85%
Ben Rice›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 11h 35m before the gameOver 1.5+132 at ProphetXproj 2.53 → 2+2.41%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.32u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+132 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+130
Where our side closed+125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.53 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.9%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.32u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.41%
Ceddanne Rafaela›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 11h 1m before the gameOver 1.5+132 at betPARXproj 1.78 → 2−0.14%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.32u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+132 at betPARX
Locked before the game11h 1m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.78 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.3%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.32u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.14%
Heriberto Hernandez›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 11h 40m before the gameOver 1.5+130 at Novigproj 1.93 → 2+2.35%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.30u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+130 at Novig
Locked before the game11h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+130
Where our side closed+115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.93 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.5%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.30u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.35%
Willson Contreras›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameOver 1.5+127 at ProphetXproj 2.13 → 4+1.52%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.27u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+127 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.13 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.6%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.27u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.52%
Shohei Ohtani›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 11h 26m before the gameOver 1.5+124 at ProphetXproj 2.11 → 3+1.52%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.24u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+124 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 26m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+122
Where our side closed+118
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.11 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.0%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.24u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.52%
Michael Harris II›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 13h 35m before the gameOver 1.5+114 at Fliffproj 2.16 → 2+0.12%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.14u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+114 at Fliff
Locked before the game13h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed+113
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.16 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed46.8%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.14u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.12%
Wyatt Langford›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameOver 1.5+113 at BetOnlineproj 2.5 → 7+0.75%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.13u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+113 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.5 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.7%
Actual7 total bases
Settled+1.13u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.75%
Matt Olson›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 13h 35m before the gameOver 1.5+109 at Fliffproj 2.2 → 3−0.35%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.09u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+109 at Fliff
Locked before the game13h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed+112
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.2 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed48.1%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.09u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.35%
Riley Greene›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 14h 7m before the gameOver 1.5+104 at ProphetXproj 1.98 → 4+2.37%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.04u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+104 at ProphetX
Locked before the game14h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-101
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.98 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed49.1%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.04u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.37%
Nick Allen›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · hits · priced 10h 51m before the gameUnder 0.5-104 at BetOnlineproj 0.5 → 0+0.23%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.96u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-104 at BetOnline
Locked before the game10h 51m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-122
Where our side closed-106
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.5 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.2%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.96u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.23%
Yordan Alvarez›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 14h 10m before the gameOver 1.5-106 at DraftKingsproj 2.56 → 2+2.87%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.94u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took-106 at DraftKings
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+107
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.56 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed52.8%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.94u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.87%
Kahlil Watson›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 10h 25m before the gameOver 0.5-110 at ProphetXproj 0.9 → 2−0.15%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.91u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-110 at ProphetX
Locked before the game10h 25m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.9 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed52.5%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.91u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.15%
Austin Wells›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · hits · priced 15h 20m before the gameUnder 0.5-120 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.34 → 0−1.05%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.83u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-120 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game15h 20m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
Where our side closed-113
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.34 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.8%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.83u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.05%
Jazz Chisholm Jr.›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 7h 46m before the gameOver 0.5-120 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.11 → 2+1.67%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.83u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-120 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game7h 46m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-145
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.11 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.4%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.83u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Luke Keaschall›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 12h 20m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.39 → 1+2.56%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.77u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 20m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-175
Where our side closed-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.39 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.8%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.77u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.56%
Julio Rodriguez›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 14h 10m before the gameUnder 1.5-135 at DraftKingsproj 1.46 → 1−0.34%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.74u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at DraftKings
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170
Where our side closed-145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.46 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed57.5%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.74u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.34%
Ryan Waldschmidt›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 11h 55m before the gameOver 0.5-140 at ESPN BETproj 1.03 → 1−0.64%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.71u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-140 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 55m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-175
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.03 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.4%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.71u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.64%
J.T. Realmuto›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 10h 20m before the gameOver 0.5-143 at BetOnlineproj 1.39 → 1+0.60%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.70u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-143 at BetOnline
Locked before the game10h 20m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-185
Where our side closed-152
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.39 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.3%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.70u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.60%
AndréS Chaparro›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · total bases · priced 11h 36m before the gameUnder 1.5-150 at ESPN BETproj 1.07 → 0+0.32%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160 on 0.5
Where our side closed-164
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.07 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.32%
Andrew Benintendi›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 8h 15m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at BetOnlineproj 1.33 → 2not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at BetOnline
Locked before the game8h 15m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed+167 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.33 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.1%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Brayan Rocchio›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 10h 25m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.59 → 1+1.03%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game10h 25m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.59 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.7%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Colson Montgomery›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · hits · priced 14h 15m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.85 → 2−0.17%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-150 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game14h 15m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.85 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.4%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.17%
Romy Gonzalez›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 11h 5m before the gameUnder 1.5-157 at betPARXproj 1.15 → 0+1.55%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.64u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-157 at betPARX
Locked before the game11h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-195
Where our side closed-175
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.15 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed61.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.64u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.55%
Bryce Eldridge›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · hits · priced 14h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-160 at Novigproj 0.99 → 1−2.74%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.63u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-160 at Novig
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-212
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.99 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.4%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.63u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.74%
Edwin Arroyo›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 11h 10m before the gameUnder 1.5-165 at Caesarsproj 0.94 → 0−3.02%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at Caesars
Locked before the game11h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-159
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.6%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.02%
Jacob Young›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · total bases · priced 12h 5m before the gameUnder 1.5-165 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.94 → 1−1.45%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-195 on 0.5
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed63.6%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Kerry Carpenter›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 12h 7m before the gameUnder 1.5-165proj 0.94 → 0−3.85%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game12h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-192 on 1
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed63.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
TJ Friedl›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 11h 10m before the gameUnder 1.5-180proj 0.78 → 0−0.24%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.56u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-180 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game11h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170 on 0.5
Where our side closed-175
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.78 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed66.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.56u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.24%
Nathan Lukes›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 9h 31m before the gameOver 0.5-181 at ReBetproj 1.27 → 2not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.55u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-181 at ReBet
Locked before the game9h 31m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-207
Where our side closed+155 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.27 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.5%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.55u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Troy Johnston›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 11h 55m before the gameUnder 1.5-195 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.89 → 1+0.99%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.51u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-195 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game11h 55m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200
Where our side closed-190
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.89 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed66.4%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.51u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Dylan Crews›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · hits · priced 11h 36m before the gameUnder 1.5-220 at DraftKingsproj 0.67 → 10.00%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.45u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-220 at DraftKings
Locked before the game11h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-241
Where our side closed-220
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.67 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed69.2%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.45u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish0.00%
Blaze Jordan›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 11h 55m before the gameUnder 1.5-180 at ESPN BETproj 0.85 → 5not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-180 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 55m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180 on 0.5
Where our side closed+140 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.85 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed65.3%
Actual5 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Bryan Reynolds›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 10h 25m before the gameOver 1.5+167 at BetOnlineproj 1.89 → 0+0.66%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+167 at BetOnline
Locked before the game10h 25m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+147
Where our side closed+164
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.89 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed37.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.66%
Colby Thomas›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · hits · priced 12h 5m before the gameUnder 0.5+150 at ESPN BETproj 0.41 → 1+1.98%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+150 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game12h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+150
Where our side closed+138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.41 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed41.4%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.98%
Curtis Mead›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · total bases · priced 12h 5m before the gameOver 1.5+100 at DraftKingsproj 2.19 → 1+3.17%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+100 at DraftKings
Locked before the game12h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-107
Where our side closed-113
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.19 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.17%
Dansby Swanson›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 12h 20m before the gameOver 0.5-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.96 → 0+0.38%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 20m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-165
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.96 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.38%
Drew Cavanaugh›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · hits · priced 14h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-105 at Novigproj 0.64 → 0−2.38%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-105 at Novig
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-138
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.64 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.5%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.38%
Elly De La Cruz›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 11h before the gameOver 1.5-128 at BetOnlineproj 2.38 → 1+2.61%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took-128 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160
Where our side closed-144
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.38 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed56.4%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.61%
Esteury Ruiz›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · hits · priced 10h 46m before the gameUnder 0.5-101 at BetOnlineproj 0.36 → 1−0.37%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-101 at BetOnline
Locked before the game10h 46m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-106
Where our side closed+102
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.36 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed50.5%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.37%
Fernando Tatis Jr.›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 10h before the gameUnder 1.5-200 at ESPN BETproj 1.12 → 2−0.25%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-200 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game10h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-225
Where our side closed-200
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.12 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed67.0%
Actual2 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.25%
Gabriel Moreno›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 14h 10m before the gameOver 1.5+130 at ProphetXproj 1.61 → 0−0.24%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+130 at ProphetX
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+125
Where our side closed+128
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.61 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.24%
Heliot Ramos›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 14h 10m before the gameOver 1.5+152 at Novigproj 2.15 → 1−2.88%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+152 at Novig
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+138
Where our side closed+174
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.15 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed39.7%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.88%
Jackson Merrill›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 10h 25m before the gameUnder 1.5-208 at BetOnlineproj 0.85 → 4+1.22%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-208 at BetOnline
Locked before the game10h 25m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-240
Where our side closed-220
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.85 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed69.1%
Actual4 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.22%
Jahmai Jones›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · hits · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 0.5+102 at BetOnlineproj 0.21 → 1−6.68%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+102 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
Where our side closed+138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.21 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed52.9%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−6.68%
Jake Bauers›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 12h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-115 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.59 → 0+1.16%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-115 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-115
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.59 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.16%
James Outman›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · hits · priced 14h 7m before the gameUnder 0.5-118proj 0.35 → 1−1.62%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-118 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game14h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-118 on 1
Where our side closed-114
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.35 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.2%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.62%
Jase Bowen›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 16h 10m before the gameUnder 0.5+102 at DraftKingsproj 0.15 → 2+0.64%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+102 at DraftKings
Locked before the game16h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+102
Where our side closed+105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.15 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.6%
Actual2 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.64%
Jo Adell›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · hits · priced 16h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-180 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.73 → 0−3.05%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-180 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game16h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed-158
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.73 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.8%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.05%
Jonatan Clase›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · hits · priced 16h 15m before the gameOver 0.5-105 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.75 → 0−0.12%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-105 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 15m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
Where our side closed-105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.75 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.7%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.12%
Justin Crawford›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 11h 21m before the gameOver 0.5-135 at BetOnlineproj 1.14 → 0+1.64%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h 21m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-175
Where our side closed-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.14 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.64%
Kody Clemens›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 11h 36m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 2.2 → 0−0.37%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game11h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-145
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.2 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.37%
Kyle Karros›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 11h 6m before the gameOver 1.5+142 at ProphetXproj 1.88 → 1+0.40%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+142 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 6m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+120
Where our side closed+138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.88 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.5%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.40%
Kyle Manzardo›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 10h 25m before the gameOver 0.5-118 at ProphetXproj 0.76 → 0−2.04%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-118 at ProphetX
Locked before the game10h 25m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
Where our side closed-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.76 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.04%
Lane Thomas›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 12h 10m before the gameOver 1.5+128 at Caesarsproj 2.12 → 0+1.16%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+128 at Caesars
Locked before the game12h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+115
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.12 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.16%
Mauricio Dubon›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 13h 35m before the gameOver 1.5+176proj 1.68 → 0+0.94%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+176 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game13h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+145
Where our side closed+164
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.68 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed38.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.94%
Pete Alonso›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 10h 55m before the gameOver 1.5+164 at BetOnlineproj 1.61 → 0+1.82%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+164 at BetOnline
Locked before the game10h 55m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+140
Where our side closed+149
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.61 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed38.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.82%
Ryan Jeffers›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 11h 46m before the gameOver 1.5+152 at BetOnlineproj 2.09 → 0+3.18%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+152 at BetOnline
Locked before the game11h 46m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200 on 0.5
Where our side closed+130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.09 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed40.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.18%
Ryan McMahon›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 8h 35m before the gameOver 0.5+110 at Fliffproj 1.17 → 0+6.07%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+110 at Fliff
Locked before the game8h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed-120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.17 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+6.07%
Taylor Ward›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 11h 16m before the gameOver 0.5-146 at ProphetXproj 1.26 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-146 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 16m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-250
Where our side closed+175 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.26 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Tristan Peters›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 5h 56m before the gameOver 0.5-140 at BetMGMproj 1.64 → 0−0.61%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-140 at BetMGM
Locked before the game5h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-175
Where our side closed-132
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.64 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.61%
Wilyer Abreu›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 13h 35m before the gameOver 1.5+144 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 2.07 → 0+2.07%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+144 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game13h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+135
Where our side closed+127
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.07 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.07%
Yainer Diaz›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 14h 10m before the gameOver 1.5+166 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.76 → 1+2.15%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+166 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+150
Where our side closed+152
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.76 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed38.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.15%
Zach Neto›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 16h 7m before the gameOver 1.5+141 at Novigproj 1.79 → 1+3.39%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+141 at Novig
Locked before the game16h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+141
Where our side closed+122
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.79 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.0%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.39%
Bobby Witt Jr.›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 9h 36m before the gameOver 1.5-120 at ProphetXproj 1.71−0.91%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took-120 at ProphetX
Locked before the game9h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.71 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed54.7%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Francisco Alvarez›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 9h 56m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at BetOnlineproj 1.54+2.59%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at BetOnline
Locked before the game9h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160
Where our side closed-149
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.54 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.2%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jorge Polanco›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 1.5-180 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.96not measurablethe book moved the lineDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-180 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-175
Where our side closed+135 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.96 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed64.4%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Otto Lopez›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 12h 10m before the gameOver 1.5+126 at DraftKingsproj 2.41+3.20%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+126 at DraftKings
Locked before the game12h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+126
Where our side closed+106
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.41 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.7%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Rece Hinds›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · hits · priced 12h 10m before the gameUnder 0.5-125 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.31not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-125 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.31 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.3%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Jul 18Sat33−30−4.35urunning +5.68u12 voidprevious model
Bryan Reynolds›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 10h 26m before the gameOver 1.5+156 at ProphetXproj 1.73 → 3+4.99%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.56u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+156 at ProphetX
Locked before the game10h 26m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+145
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.73 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed39.2%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.56u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.99%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+6.39%
…of which: waiting paid+1.75%
…of which: market drift+4.64%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.75% + +4.64% = +6.39%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +4.99% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Rafael Devers›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 12h 8m before the gameOver 1.5+150 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.96 → 4+0.97%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+150 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game12h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+150
Where our side closed+140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.96 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed40.1%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.97%
Seiya Suzuki›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 14h 20m before the gameOver 1.5+144 at Hard Rock Betproj 2.14 → 2−0.10%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.44u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+144 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game14h 20m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+130
Where our side closed+135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.14 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.3%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.44u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.10%
Brandon Nimmo›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 9h 36m before the gameOver 1.5+125 at BetMGMproj 1.69 → 2−0.97%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.25u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+125 at BetMGM
Locked before the game9h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed+130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.69 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.9%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.25u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.97%
Eric Wagaman›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · hits · priced 11h 4m before the gameUnder 0.5+120proj 0.32 → 0+5.71%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.20u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+120 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game11h 4m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+105
Where our side closed-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.32 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed49.2%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.20u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+5.71%
Henry Davis›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · hits · priced 10h 26m before the gameOver 0.5+113 at Novigproj 0.53 → 1+3.05%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.13u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took+113 at Novig
Locked before the game10h 26m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+113
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.53 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed47.3%
Actual1 hits
Settled+1.13u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.05%
Tyler Soderstrom›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · total bases · priced 16h 5m before the gameOver 1.5+110 at Bovadaproj 1.59 → 5+2.79%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.10u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+110 at Bovada
Locked before the game16h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed-109
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.59 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed48.0%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+1.10u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.79%
Yordan Alvarez›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 12h 9m before the gameOver 1.5+110 at Novigproj 2.48 → 2+0.43%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.10u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+110 at Novig
Locked before the game12h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+106
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.48 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed48.0%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.10u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.43%
Leo Jimenez›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · hits · priced 14h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-120 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.62 → 1−1.29%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.83u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-120 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.62 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.5%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.83u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.29%
Xander Bogaerts›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 1.5-130 at ESPN BETproj 1.18 → 0+0.12%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.77u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160
Where our side closed-122
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.18 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed56.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.77u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.12%
Andres Gimenez›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 10h 3m before the gameOver 0.5-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.94 → 1+1.39%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.74u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game10h 3m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed-155
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.6%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.74u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Bryce Eldridge›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 12h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-135 at ProphetXproj 1.71 → 2not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.74u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at ProphetX
Locked before the game12h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-176
Where our side closed+163 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.71 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.8%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.74u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Edwin Arroyo›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 11h 6m before the gameUnder 1.5-140 at ESPN BETproj 0.94 → 1+2.06%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.71u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-140 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 6m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-175
Where our side closed-154
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.94 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed60.2%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.71u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.06%
Garrett Mitchell›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 14h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-145 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 2.02 → 4+0.67%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.69u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-145 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-145
Where our side closed-159
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.02 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.0%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+0.69u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Andruw Monasterio›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 12h 41m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.33 → 4+2.19%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game12h 41m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170
Where our side closed-170
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.33 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.5%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Bryson Stott›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 13h 5m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.39 → 3−1.07%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game13h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed-154
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.39 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.7%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.07%
Esmerlyn Valdez›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · hits · priced 9h 56m before the gameOver 0.5-150 at BetMGMproj 1.29 → 1+5.53%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-150 at BetMGM
Locked before the game9h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-161
Where our side closed-215
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.29 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.3%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+5.53%
Ezequiel Tovar›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 10h 56m before the gameUnder 1.5-150 at ESPN BETproj 1.01 → 1+0.97%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game10h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed-157
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.01 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed60.6%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.97%
Mike Trout›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 16h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-150proj 1.97 → 1not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-150 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-162 on 1
Where our side closed+175 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.97 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.4%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Michael Massey›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 8h 46m before the gameOver 0.5-156 at Novigproj 0.84 → 1+1.83%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.64u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-156 at Novig
Locked before the game8h 46m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-225
Where our side closed-182
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.84 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.0%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.64u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.83%
Max Kepler›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 12h 9m before the gameUnder 1.5-159 at DraftKingsproj 1 → 0+3.22%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.63u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-159 at DraftKings
Locked before the game12h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-169
Where our side closed-185
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.63u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.22%
Jake Burger›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 12h 9m before the gameUnder 1.5-160 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.18 → 1−0.71%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.63u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-160 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game12h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-195
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.18 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.63u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.71%
Nathan Lukes›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 6h 53m before the gameUnder 1.5-165 at BetMGMproj 1.32 → 0−1.07%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.61u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at BetMGM
Locked before the game6h 53m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-179
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.32 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.61u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.07%
Ben Williamson›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 13h 9m before the gameUnder 1.5-175 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.07 → 0−0.61%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.57u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-175 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game13h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.07 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed64.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.57u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.61%
Brandon Lowe›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · hits · priced 9h 56m before the gameOver 0.5-175 at BetMGMproj 0.99 → 2−2.19%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.57u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-175 at BetMGM
Locked before the game9h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-216
Where our side closed-185
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.99 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed65.0%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.57u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.19%
Isaac Paredes›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 12h 9m before the gameOver 0.5-175 at DraftKingsproj 1.64 → 1not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.57u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-175 at DraftKings
Locked before the game12h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+141 on 1.5
Where our side closed+145 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.64 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed64.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.57u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Javier Sanoja›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · hits · priced 12h 9m before the gameOver 0.5-190 at Novigproj 0.96 → 1−0.21%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.53u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-190 at Novig
Locked before the game12h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-228
Where our side closed-200
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.96 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed65.8%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.53u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.21%
Josh Bell›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · hits · priced 11h 36m before the gameOver 0.5-200 at ESPN BETproj 0.96 → 1−1.44%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-200 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-240
Where our side closed-182
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.96 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed66.7%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.44%
Basis
Nick Gonzales›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · hits · priced 9h 56m before the gameOver 0.5-200 at BetMGMproj 1.26 → 2not measurablethe book moved the line✓ Won+0.50u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-200 at BetMGM
Locked before the game9h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-233
Where our side closed+170 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.26 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed67.9%
Actual2 hits
Settled+0.50u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Ozzie Albies›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · hits · priced 9h 36m before the gameUnder 1.5-210 at BetMGMproj 0.98 → 0−1.08%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.48u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-210 at BetMGM
Locked before the game9h 36m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-250
Where our side closed-200
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.98 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed69.7%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.48u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.08%
Shea Langeliers›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · hits · priced 16h 5m before the gameUnder 1.5-220 at Hard Rock Betproj 0.9 → 0−0.65%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.45u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-220 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-230
Where our side closed-210
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.9 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed69.2%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.45u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.65%
TJ Rumfield›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · hits · priced 10h 51m before the gameOver 0.5-220 at ESPN BETproj 1.02 → 4+0.82%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.45u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-220 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game10h 51m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-300 on 1.5
Where our side closed-250
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.02 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed69.5%
Actual4 hits
Settled+0.45u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.82%
Manny Machado›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 10h 16m before the gameUnder 1.5-235 at BetMGMproj 0.93 → 0−0.15%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.43u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-235 at BetMGM
Locked before the game10h 16m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-240
Where our side closed-235
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.93 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed70.3%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.43u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.15%
Alex Bregman›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 14h 20m before the gameOver 1.5+150 at Fliffproj 1.56 → 0−0.47%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+150 at Fliff
Locked before the game14h 20m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-205 on 0.5
Where our side closed+155
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.56 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed40.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.47%
Braden Montgomery›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 6h 38m before the gameUnder 1.5-148 at betPARXproj 1.43 → 2+2.59%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-148 at betPARX
Locked before the game6h 38m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.43 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.4%
Actual2 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.59%
Carlos Cortes›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · total bases · priced 22h 5m before the gameUnder 1.5-141 at Caesarsproj 0.88 → 6+0.68%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-141 at Caesars
Locked before the game22h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-141
Where our side closed-145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.88 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.6%
Actual6 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.68%
Carson Benge›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 11h 4m before the gameOver 0.5-125 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.6 → 0+1.20%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-125 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game11h 4m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-175
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.6 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.20%
Casey Schmitt›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 12h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at ProphetXproj 1.79 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at ProphetX
Locked before the game12h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+144 on 1.5
Where our side closed+175 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.79 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Coby Mayo›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 16h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-105 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.23 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-105 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game16h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed+163 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.23 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed53.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Colt Keith›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 18h 6m before the gameUnder 1.5-160 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.3 → 3+0.90%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-160 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game18h 6m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed-175
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.3 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed61.9%
Actual3 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.90%
Connor Wong›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 12h 21m before the gameOver 0.5-135 at ReBetproj 1.05 → 0−1.05%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at ReBet
Locked before the game12h 21m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170
Where our side closed-148
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.05 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.05%
Curtis Mead›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · hits · priced 18h 4m before the gameOver 0.5-200 at DraftKingsproj 1.22 → 0not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-200 at DraftKings
Locked before the game18h 4m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-217
Where our side closed+186 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.22 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed67.2%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Denzer Guzman›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 16h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-125 at ProphetXproj 1.41 → 0−3.32%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-125 at ProphetX
Locked before the game16h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-138
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.41 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.32%
Derek Hill›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 11h 4m before the gameOver 0.5-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.2 → 0+1.29%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game11h 4m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-180
Where our side closed-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.2 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.29%
Drew Cavanaugh›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · hits · priced 11h 59m before the gameOver 0.5+113 at ProphetXproj 0.69 → 0not measurableno closing quote✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took+113 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 59m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-132
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.69 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed47.0%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Eli White›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · hits · priced 12h 9m before the gameUnder 0.5+110 at ProphetXproj 0.47 → 1−3.63%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+110 at ProphetX
Locked before the game12h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-122
Where our side closed+123
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.47 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.9%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.63%
Jackson Holliday›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 16h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-110 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.88 → 0−0.73%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-110 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game16h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-110
Where our side closed-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.88 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jacob Wilson›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · total bases · priced 14h 5m before the gameUnder 1.5-110 at Hard Rock Betproj 1.46 → 5−2.14%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-110 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game14h 5m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
Where our side closed-105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.46 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed54.0%
Actual5 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−2.14%
Jake Bauers›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 14h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.84 → 0−0.07%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
Where our side closed-145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.84 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.07%
Jake Cronenworth›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 9h 46m before the gameUnder 1.5-165 at ESPN BETproj 1.18 → 3+0.92%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game9h 46m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-190
Where our side closed-175
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.18 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.3%
Actual3 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.92%
Joey Ortiz›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 16h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.33 → 0+0.32%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game16h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-130
Where our side closed-137
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.33 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.32%
Jordan Walker›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 14h 10m before the gameOver 1.5+115 at ProphetXproj 2.05 → 1−0.40%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+115 at ProphetX
Locked before the game14h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed+115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.05 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed46.6%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.40%
Luke Raley›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-115 at ProphetXproj 1 → 0+0.89%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-115 at ProphetX
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-138
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.89%
Marcus Semien›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 11h 4m before the gameOver 0.5-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.05 → 0+1.38%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game11h 4m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-185
Where our side closed-155
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.05 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed60.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Nico Hoerner›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 9h 16m before the gameUnder 1.5-170 at Bovadaproj 1.12 → 4+1.54%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-170 at Bovada
Locked before the game9h 16m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-210
Where our side closed-190
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.12 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed63.4%
Actual4 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.54%
Pete Crow-Armstrong›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 16h 20m before the gameOver 1.5+100 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.94 → 0−2.39%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+100 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game16h 20m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.94 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Taylor Walls›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 17h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.86 → 0+1.29%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game17h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
Where our side closed-161
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.86 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.29%
Tim Tawa›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 9h 16m before the gameOver 0.5-124 at ReBetproj 1.3 → 0+2.98%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-124 at ReBet
Locked before the game9h 16m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-170
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.3 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.98%
Tristan Peters›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 11h 43m before the gameOver 0.5-165 at BetMGMproj 1.68 → 0−0.51%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 at BetMGM
Locked before the game11h 43m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-184
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.68 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed63.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.51%
Vladimir Guerrero Jr.›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 11h 53m before the gameUnder 1.5-150 at ESPN BETproj 1.33 → 3−2.30%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 53m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.33 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed60.0%
Actual3 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Willson Contreras›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 11h 16m before the gameOver 1.5+110 at ESPN BETproj 2.18 → 0+1.67%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+110 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 16m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+110
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.18 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.67%
Yainer Diaz›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 16h 10m before the gameOver 1.5+166 at ProphetXproj 1.78 → 0+1.02%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+166 at ProphetX
Locked before the game16h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+166
Where our side closed+163
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.78 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed38.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.02%
Zach McKinstry›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 16h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-165proj 1.24 → 0not measurableno closing quote✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-165 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-194 on 1
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.24 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed62.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Ben Rice›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 16h 7m before the gameOver 1.5+120 at Hard Rock Betproj 2.53+4.52%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+120 at Hard Rock Bet
Locked before the game16h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+105
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.53 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.9%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Blaze Jordan›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 8h 40m before the gameUnder 1.5-190 at ESPN BETproj 0.85not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-190 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game8h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.85 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed66.5%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Dalton Rushing›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 16h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-130 at ProphetXproj 1.39−0.68%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-130 at ProphetX
Locked before the game16h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-138
Where our side closed-129
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.39 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed57.3%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jasson DomíNguez›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 14h 8m before the gameOver 0.5-155 at ProphetXproj 1.49not measurablethe book moved the linePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-155 at ProphetX
Locked before the game14h 8m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-184
Where our side closed+153 on 1.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.49 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed61.7%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Jazz Chisholm Jr.›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 16h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-140proj 1.11−0.79%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-140 (no book on this row)
Locked before the game16h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-140
Where our side closed-145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.11 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.4%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jorge Mateo›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · hits · priced 16h 10m before the gameUnder 0.5-110 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 0.32not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-110 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game16h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.32 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed53.4%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Kyle Karros›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 11h 16m before the gameOver 1.5+115 at ProphetXproj 1.88−2.83%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+115 at ProphetX
Locked before the game11h 16m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed+117
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.88 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.3%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Lourdes Gurriel Jr.›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 10h 46m before the gameUnder 1.5-190 at ESPN BETproj 0.99not measurablethe book moved the lineDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-190 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game10h 46m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-197
Where our side closed+124 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.99 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed66.0%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Max Muncy›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 16h 7m before the gameOver 0.5-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)proj 1.17−0.57%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-135 at Hard Rock Bet (OH)
Locked before the game16h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.17 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed58.6%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Oswald Peraza›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 14h 7m before the gameOver 0.5+100 at ProphetXproj 0.58+1.16%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+100 at ProphetX
Locked before the game14h 7m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-132
Where our side closed-120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.58 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed50.4%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Sung-Mun Song›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 11h 56m before the gameUnder 0.5+140 at ESPN BETproj 0.45not measurableno closing quoteDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+140 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.45 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed42.1%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
TJ Friedl›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 11h 10m before the gameUnder 1.5-150 at ESPN BETproj 0.78−1.72%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at ESPN BET
Locked before the game11h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200 on 0.5
Where our side closed-166
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.78 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed62.7%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jul 17Fri33−31+4.76urunning +10.02u6 voidprevious model
Sam Antonacci›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 1d 5h before the gameOver 1.5+154 at Dabbleproj 1.58 → 5+2.65%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.54u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+154 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 5h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+154
Where our side closed+138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.58 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed40.2%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+1.54u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.65%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.65%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.65%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Casey Schmitt›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 1d 2h before the gameOver 1.5+152 at Dabbleproj 1.75 → 2−1.22%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.52u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+152 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 2h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+151
Where our side closed+160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.75 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed40.9%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.52u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−1.22%
CJ Abrams›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · total bases · priced 1d 1h before the gameOver 1.5+145 at Dabbleproj 1.68 → 2+4.03%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.45u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+145 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 1h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+145
Where our side closed+123
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.68 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.9%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.45u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.03%
Sung-Mun Song›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 1d 4h before the gameUnder 0.5+145 at Dabbleproj 0.49 → 0not measurableno closing quote✓ Won+1.45u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+145 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 4h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.49 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed43.0%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.45u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — no usable closing quote was captured before the game. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Jeremy Pena›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 22h 10m before the gameOver 1.5+142 at Dabbleproj 1.85 → 2+0.69%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.42u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+142 at Dabble
Locked before the game22h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+137
Where our side closed+138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.85 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.8%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.42u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.69%
Otto Lopez›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 1d 3h before the gameOver 1.5+139 at Dabbleproj 2.41 → 3+2.60%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.39u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+139 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 3h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+139
Where our side closed+125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.41 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.7%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.39u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.60%
Mike Trout›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 1d 1h before the gameOver 1.5+135 at Dabbleproj 1.89 → 2−0.54%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.35u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+135 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 1h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+135
Where our side closed+138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.89 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.1%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.35u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.54%
Ozzie Albies›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 1d 3h before the gameOver 1.5+132 at Dabbleproj 1.68 → 2+0.95%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.32u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+132 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 3h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+132
Where our side closed+127
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.68 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.8%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.32u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.95%
Ceddanne Rafaela›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 9h 31m before the gameOver 1.5+130 at Novigproj 1.62 → 2+1.98%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.30u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+130 at Novig
Locked before the game9h 31m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+122
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.62 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.0%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.30u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.98%
Ernie Clement›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 1d 5h before the gameOver 1.5+125 at Dabbleproj 1.63 → 2+2.07%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.25u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+125 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 5h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+125
Where our side closed+115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.63 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.0%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.25u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.07%
Logan O'Hoppe›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · hits · priced 1d 1h before the gameUnder 0.5+125 at Dabbleproj 0.46 → 0+0.60%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.25u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+125 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 1h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+125
Where our side closed+122
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.46 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed46.5%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.25u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.60%
Ben Rice›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 1d 5h before the gameOver 1.5+123 at Dabbleproj 2.41 → 3+1.45%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.23u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+123 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 5h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+123
Where our side closed+116
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.41 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.4%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.23u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.45%
Curtis Mead›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · total bases · priced 1d 1h before the gameOver 1.5+123 at Dabbleproj 2.09 → 5+4.66%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.23u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+123 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 1h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+123
Where our side closed+102
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.09 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed46.6%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+1.23u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.66%
Matt Olson›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 1d 3h before the gameOver 1.5+112 at Dabbleproj 2.15 → 5+0.45%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.12u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+112 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 3h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+112
Where our side closed+110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.15 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed48.9%
Actual5 total bases
Settled+1.12u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.45%
Ryan Jeffers›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 1d 2h before the gameOver 1.5+112 at Dabbleproj 1.92 → 4+5.21%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.12u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+112 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 2h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+112
Where our side closed-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.92 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed48.3%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.12u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+5.21%
Victor Robles›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · hits · priced 1d 4h before the gameUnder 0.5+112 at Dabbleproj 0.48 → 0+2.09%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.12u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+112 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 4h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+112
Where our side closed+103
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.48 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.7%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.12u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.09%
Seiya Suzuki›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 1d 2h before the gameOver 1.5+111 at Dabbleproj 2.22 → 2+5.44%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.11u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+111 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 2h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+111
Where our side closed-112
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.22 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed49.3%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.11u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+5.44%
Coby Mayo›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 22h 10m before the gameOver 0.5+110 at Fanatics Sportsbookproj 1.2 → 1+4.53%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.10u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+110 at Fanatics Sportsbook
Locked before the game22h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+110
Where our side closed-109
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.2 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed50.7%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+1.10u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.53%
Yordan Alvarez›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 1d 0h before the gameOver 1.5+109 at Dabbleproj 2.36 → 3+4.53%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.09u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+109 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 0h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+109
Where our side closed-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.36 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.0%
Actual3 total bases
Settled+1.09u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.53%
Griffin Conine›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 1d 3h before the gameOver 0.5+105 at Dabbleproj 1.49 → 4+6.78%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.05u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+105 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 3h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+105
Where our side closed-125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.49 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.7%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.05u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+6.78%
Michael Harris II›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 1d 3h before the gameOver 1.5+104 at Dabbleproj 1.77 → 4+0.98%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.04u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+104 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 3h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+104
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.77 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed49.5%
Actual4 total bases
Settled+1.04u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.98%
Michael Busch›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 1d 2h before the gameUnder 1.5+101 at Dabbleproj 1.5 → 1+2.63%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.01u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took+101 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 2h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+101
Where our side closed-110
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.5 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.5%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+1.01u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.63%
Sal Stewart›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 1d 4h before the gameOver 1.5-106 at Dabbleproj 2.24 → 2+5.07%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.94u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took-106 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 4h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-106
Where our side closed-130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.24 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed53.1%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+0.94u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+5.07%
Corbin Carroll›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 21h 40m before the gameUnder 1.5-112 at Dabbleproj 0.99 → 0+2.73%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.89u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-112 at Dabble
Locked before the game21h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-122
Where our side closed-125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.99 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed55.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.89u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.73%
Austin Wells›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · hits · priced 1d 3h before the gameUnder 0.5-115 at Dabbleproj 0.38 → 0+2.07%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.87u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-115 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 3h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-116
Where our side closed-125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.38 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed55.6%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.87u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.07%
Tsung-Che Cheng›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · hits · priced 6h 56m before the gameOver 0.5-125 at BetMGMproj 0.8 → 1+2.78%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.80u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-125 at BetMGM
Locked before the game6h 56m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-160
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.8 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.7%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.80u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.78%
Dylan Crews›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · total bases · priced 1d 1h before the gameUnder 1.5-127 at Dabbleproj 1.03 → 0+2.04%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.79u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-127 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 1h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-127
Where our side closed-138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.03 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed57.6%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.79u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.04%
Gavin Sheets›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 1d 4h before the gameUnder 1.5-133 at Dabbleproj 1.01 → 0+1.93%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.75u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-133 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 4h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-133
Where our side closed-144
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.01 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed58.8%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.75u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.93%
James Outman›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · hits · priced 1d 1h before the gameUnder 0.5-137 at Dabbleproj 0.34 → 0−0.91%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.73u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-137 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 1h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-137
Where our side closed-132
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.34 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.3%
Actual0 hits
Settled+0.73u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.91%
Tristan Peters›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · hits · priced 1d 5h before the gameOver 0.5-145 at Dabbleproj 1.01 → 1+1.60%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.69u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-145 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 5h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-145
Where our side closed-155
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.01 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed59.7%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.69u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.60%
Jarren Duran›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 19h 35m before the gameUnder 1.5-147 at Fliffproj 1.03 → 1+5.40%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.68u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-147 at Fliff
Locked before the game19h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-200
Where our side closed-185
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.03 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed60.2%
Actual1 total bases
Settled+0.68u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+5.40%
Jake McCarthy›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · hits · priced 1d 4h before the gameUnder 1.5-149 at Dabbleproj 1.04 → 1+2.42%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-149 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 4h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-149
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.04 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed61.2%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.42%
Xander Bogaerts›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 1d 4h before the gameUnder 1.5-208 at Dabbleproj 0.75 → 1+2.16%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.48u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-208 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 4h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-208
Where our side closed-230
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.75 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed69.4%
Actual1 hits
Settled+0.48u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.16%
AndréS Chaparro›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · hits · priced 1d 3h before the gameUnder 0.5+105 at Dabbleproj 0.32 → 3−3.33%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+105 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 3h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+105
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.32 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.3%
Actual3 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.33%
Brice Turang›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 1d 3h before the gameOver 1.5+137 at Dabbleproj 2.21 → 0−0.53%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+137 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 3h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+137
Where our side closed+140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.21 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.6%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.53%
Colt Emerson›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 1d 2h before the gameOver 0.5+111 at Dabbleproj 0.95 → 0+6.10%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+111 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 2h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+111
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.95 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed48.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+6.10%
Colton Cowser›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · hits · priced 22h 10m before the gameUnder 0.5-109 at Dabbleproj 0.36 → 1−0.93%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took-109 at Dabble
Locked before the game22h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-116
Where our side closed-105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.36 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed53.9%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.93%
Dillon Dingler›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · total bases · priced 1d 1h before the gameOver 1.5+139 at Dabbleproj 1.52 → 1+1.08%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+139 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 1h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+139
Where our side closed+133
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.52 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.08%
Drake Baldwin›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 1d 3h before the gameUnder 1.5-105 at Dabbleproj 1.28 → 6+0.93%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-105 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 3h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed-109
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.28 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed52.5%
Actual6 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.93%
Elly De La Cruz›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · hits · priced 1d 4h before the gameUnder 1.5-133 at Dabbleproj 1.12 → 4+2.92%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-133 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 4h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-133
Where our side closed-150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.12 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed58.4%
Actual4 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.92%
Fernando Tatis Jr.›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · hits · priced 1d 4h before the gameUnder 1.5-149 at Dabbleproj 1.03 → 3+2.42%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 hits
Price we took-149 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 4h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-149
Where our side closed-165
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.03 hits
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed61.3%
Actual3 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.42%
Freddie Freeman›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 1d 5h before the gameOver 1.5+102 at Dabbleproj 1.82 → 0−3.42%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+102 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 5h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+102
Where our side closed+117
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.82 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.1%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−3.42%
Gabriel Moreno›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 21h 40m before the gameUnder 1.5-137 at Dabbleproj 1.44 → 3+3.13%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-137 at Dabble
Locked before the game21h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-135
Where our side closed-156
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.44 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed58.0%
Actual3 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.13%
Heliot Ramos›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 1d 2h before the gameOver 1.5+157 at Dabbleproj 2.12 → 1not measurablethe book moved the line✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+157 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 2h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+158
Where our side closed-159 on 0.5
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.12 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed41.3%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Hunter Goodman›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 1d 4h before the gameOver 1.5-106 at Dabbleproj 2.37 → 0+4.88%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took-106 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 4h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-106
Where our side closed-129
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.37 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed53.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.88%
Jakob Marsee›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 1d 3h before the gameOver 0.5+104 at Dabbleproj 0.97 → 0+5.73%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+104 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 3h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+104
Where our side closed-121
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.97 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed50.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+5.73%
James Wood›Washington Nationals vs Athletics · total bases · priced 1d 3h before the gameOver 1.5+103 at Dabbleproj 2.91 → 1+4.23%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+103 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 3h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+103
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.91 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed52.3%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.23%
JJ Wetherholt›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 21h 40m before the gameUnder 1.5-120 at Dabbleproj 1.42 → 4+3.79%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-120 at Dabble
Locked before the game21h 40m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-120
Where our side closed-140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.42 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed55.0%
Actual4 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.79%
Joe Mack›Miami Marlins vs Milwaukee Brewers · total bases · priced 1d 3h before the gameOver 0.5+101 at Dabbleproj 1.21 → 0+3.74%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+101 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 3h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+101
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.21 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.74%
Jonathan Aranda›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 9h 35m before the gameOver 1.5+134 at ProphetXproj 1.85 → 0+0.74%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+134 at ProphetX
Locked before the game9h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+126
Where our side closed+130
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.85 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.74%
Jordan Walker›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 1d 1h before the gameOver 1.5+106 at Dabbleproj 2.06 → 1−0.47%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+106 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 1h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+106
Where our side closed+108
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.06 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed49.9%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.47%
Josh Bell›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 1d 2h before the gameOver 1.5+104 at Dabbleproj 2.03 → 1+0.98%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+104 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 2h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+104
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.03 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.2%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.98%
Junior Caminero›Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox · total bases · priced 17h 35m before the gameOver 1.5-103 at DraftKingsproj 2.44 → 1−0.74%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took-103 at DraftKings
Locked before the game17h 35m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-106
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.44 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed50.9%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.74%
Kazuma Okamoto›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 1d 5h before the gameOver 1.5+146 at Dabbleproj 1.88 → 0+4.80%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+146 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 5h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+146
Where our side closed+120
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.88 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.80%
Ketel Marte›St. Louis Cardinals vs Arizona Diamondbacks · total bases · priced 1d 1h before the gameOver 1.5+117 at Dabbleproj 1.94 → 1+2.70%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+117 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 1h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+117
Where our side closed+105
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.94 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.3%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.70%
Kody Clemens›Minnesota Twins vs Chicago Cubs · total bases · priced 1d 2h before the gameOver 1.5+100 at Dabbleproj 2.06 → 00.00%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+100 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 2h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.06 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed51.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish0.00%
Kyle Karros›Cincinnati Reds vs Colorado Rockies · total bases · priced 1d 4h before the gameOver 1.5+129 at Dabbleproj 1.88 → 0+3.06%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+129 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 4h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+129
Where our side closed+114
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.88 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.0%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.06%
LaMonte Wade Jr.›Baltimore Orioles vs Houston Astros · total bases · priced 22h 10m before the gameOver 0.5-105 at Dabbleproj 1.6 → 0+4.34%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-105 at Dabble
Locked before the game22h 10m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-105
Where our side closed-125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.6 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed54.2%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+4.34%
Luis Arraez›San Francisco Giants vs Seattle Mariners · total bases · priced 1d 2h before the gameOver 1.5+160 at Dabbleproj 1.97 → 1+2.02%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+160 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 2h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+157
Where our side closed+147
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.97 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed40.5%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.02%
Manny Machado›San Diego Padres vs Kansas City Royals · total bases · priced 1d 4h before the gameOver 1.5+117 at Dabbleproj 1.93 → 0+3.92%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+117 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 4h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+117
Where our side closed+100
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.93 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.4%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+3.92%
Miguel Vargas›Chicago White Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays · total bases · priced 1d 5h before the gameOver 1.5+141 at Dabbleproj 1.88 → 1+2.95%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+141 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 5h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+141
Where our side closed+125
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.88 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.1%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.95%
Mookie Betts›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 1d 3h before the gameOver 1.5+125 at Dabbleproj 1.86 → 0−0.39%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+125 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 3h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+127
Where our side closed+127
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.86 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.39%
Shohei Ohtani›Los Angeles Dodgers vs New York Yankees · total bases · priced 1d 3h before the gameOver 1.5+120 at Fliffproj 2.16 → 0+6.00%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+120 at Fliff
Locked before the game1d 3h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-115
Where our side closed-106
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.16 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.3%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+6.00%
Zach McKinstry›Detroit Tigers vs Los Angeles Angels · hits · priced 1d 1h before the gameOver 0.5-127 at Dabbleproj 0.8 → 0+1.50%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took-127 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 1h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-127
Where our side closed-135
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.8 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed56.0%
Actual0 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.50%
Brayan Rocchio›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 1d 5h before the gameOver 1.5+177 at Dabbleproj 1.67+4.72%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+177 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 5h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+177
Where our side closed+145
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.67 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed37.5%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Bryan Reynolds›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 1d 5h before the gameOver 1.5+156 at Dabbleproj 1.73+2.60%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+156 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 5h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+156
Where our side closed+140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.73 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed40.4%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Chase DeLauter›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 1d 5h before the gameOver 1.5+132 at ProphetXproj 2.15−1.44%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+132 at ProphetX
Locked before the game1d 5h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+132
Where our side closed+140
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.15 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed45.3%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Kyle Higashioka›Texas Rangers vs Atlanta Braves · total bases · priced 1d 1h before the gameOver 0.5+100 at Dabbleproj 1.01+3.49%CLV vs closeDNP0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took+100 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 1h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+100
Where our side closed-115
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.01 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed51.5%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
DNP — did not play. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Nick Gonzales›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · total bases · priced 1d 5h before the gameOver 1.5+174 at Dabbleproj 1.62+3.50%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+174 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 5h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+174
Where our side closed+150
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.62 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed37.8%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Petey Halpin›Pittsburgh Pirates vs Cleveland Guardians · hits · priced 1d 5h before the gameUnder 0.5+119 at Dabbleproj 0.46+2.88%CLV vs closePPD0.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+119 at Dabble
Locked before the game1d 5h before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+119
Where our side closed+106
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.46 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed47.5%
Actualnever played
Settled0.00u
PPD — the game was postponed — it was never played. No stake was ever at risk, so it settles at zero and sits in neither the wins nor the losses. It stays on the record because we did take this line, and that is the claim.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish
Jul 16Thu3−2+1.38urunning +5.27uprevious model
A.J. Ewing›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 7h 9m before the gameOver 1.5+139 at Dabbleproj 1.84 → 2+0.18%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.39u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+139 at Dabble
Locked before the game7h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+139
Where our side closed+138
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.84 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed43.3%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.39u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+0.18%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+0.18%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.18%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Kyle Schwarber›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 7h 9m before the gameOver 1.5+132 at Dabbleproj 1.76 → 2+1.94%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.32u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+132 at Dabble
Locked before the game7h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+132
Where our side closed+122
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.76 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.6%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.32u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.94%
Bryson Stott›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 7h 9m before the gameUnder 1.5-150 at Bovadaproj 1.39 → 0+1.54%CLV vs close✓ Won+0.67u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 1.5 total bases
Price we took-150 at Bovada
Locked before the game7h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-150
Where our side closed-160
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.39 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed61.9%
Actual0 total bases
Settled+0.67u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+1.54%
Gabriel Rincones Jr.›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 7h 9m before the gameOver 0.5-104 at Dabbleproj 1.08 → 0−0.24%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 total bases
Price we took-104 at Dabble
Locked before the game7h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw-104
Where our side closed-103
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.08 total bases
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed52.7%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish−0.24%
Juan Soto›New York Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies · total bases · priced 7h 9m before the gameOver 1.5+120 at Dabbleproj 1.91 → 1+2.62%CLV vs close✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+120 at Dabble
Locked before the game7h 9m before the scheduled start
First price we ever saw+120
Where our side closed+108
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection1.91 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed47.7%
Actual1 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
CLV — the number we publish+2.62%
Jul 12Sun4−2+3.89urunning +3.89uprevious model
Jackson Chourio›Milwaukee Brewers vs Pittsburgh Pirates · hits · no lock timestamp on this rowOver 0.5+190proj 0.99 → 2not measurablewe never priced it✓ Won+1.90u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 0.5 hits
Price we took+190 (no book on this row)
Locked before the gameno timestamp on this row
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.99 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed35.4%
Actual2 hits
Settled+1.90u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — we never took a price on it, so there is nothing to compare. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Hunter Goodman›Colorado Rockies vs San Francisco Giants · total bases · no lock timestamp on this rowOver 1.5+136proj 2.29 → 2not measurablewe never priced it✓ Won+1.36u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+136 (no book on this row)
Locked before the gameno timestamp on this row
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.29 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed42.5%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.36u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — we never took a price on it, so there is nothing to compare. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Esmerlyn Valdez›Milwaukee Brewers vs Pittsburgh Pirates · total bases · no lock timestamp on this rowOver 1.5+132proj 3.04 → 2not measurablewe never priced it✓ Won+1.32u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+132 (no book on this row)
Locked before the gameno timestamp on this row
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection3.04 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed44.5%
Actual2 total bases
Settled+1.32u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — we never took a price on it, so there is nothing to compare. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Colton Cowser›Kansas City Royals vs Baltimore Orioles · hits · no lock timestamp on this rowUnder 0.5+131proj 0.37 → 0not measurablewe never priced it✓ Won+1.31u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+131 (no book on this row)
Locked before the gameno timestamp on this row
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.37 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed43.5%
Actual0 hits
Settled+1.31u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — we never took a price on it, so there is nothing to compare. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Joey Meneses›Athletics vs Chicago White Sox · hits · no lock timestamp on this rowUnder 0.5+144proj 0.25 → 1not measurablewe never priced it✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideUnder 0.5 hits
Price we took+144 (no book on this row)
Locked before the gameno timestamp on this row
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection0.25 hits
The market’s line0.5
Probability we displayed42.5%
Actual1 hits
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — we never took a price on it, so there is nothing to compare. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Kyle Karros›Colorado Rockies vs San Francisco Giants · total bases · no lock timestamp on this rowOver 1.5+161proj 2.05 → 0not measurablewe never priced it✗ Lost−1.00u
The position, as logged
Our sideOver 1.5 total bases
Price we took+161 (no book on this row)
Locked before the gameno timestamp on this row
What we projected, and what happened
Our projection2.05 total bases
The market’s line1.5
Probability we displayed38.5%
Actual0 total bases
Settled−1.00u
Graded from the box score at the price we took — never at a better price found afterwards. This row is permanent: positions settle, they never disappear.
Closing line value
Not measurable on this row — we never took a price on it, so there is nothing to compare. It is shown as unmeasurable rather than as zero, because those are different statements.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
All 3 groups
679
354−325
52.1%
−2.05%
−13.90u
This split partitions the headline exactly 3 groups
✓This identity holds:679 plays across the groups = 679 in the headline
✓This identity holds:354−325 across the groups = 354−325 in the headline
✓This identity holds:−13.90u across the groups = −13.90u in the headline
1 of 3 groups are under 20 decided plays, so their hit rate and return are withheld. The raw won–lost and the units are still shown, because those are counts, not rates.
613 counted above
–6 we never took a price on it, so there is nothing to compare
–44 the book moved the line, so our price and the close are quotes on two different bets
–16 no usable closing quote was captured before the game
✓This identity holds:613 + 6 + 44 + 16 = 679 graded plays in this scope
All three legs are raw price-to-price, which is the only way they telescope. The headline above is the de-vigged number on the 493 of 613 rows where we froze both sides at lock — a different, better-behaved measurement, and never averaged together with these.
Never read closing line value as a return. Beating the close by less than the margin we paid to get there still loses money: break-even is roughly half the hold, about +2.25 points. The figure above is below that line.
This is the CLV of the plays in this record, and it is not the only CLV number we publish: the wider pool of every price we ever locked — including model-qualified picks we price purely to measure ourselves and never bet — is itemised on the CLV audit. Both are real and they answer different questions, which is why they are never averaged into one.
Both directions, same type size, same panel. A record page that can tell you its best day and not its worst one is an advertisement with a table in it. Every one of these days is expandable in the ledger above — the bad ones are not archived any deeper than the good ones.
What would prove this page wrong. A play that appears here today and is gone tomorrow; a loss that changes to a void; a start date that moves after a bad week; a subset whose n cannot be reconciled with the headline’s n. The CSV below is downloadable and diffable precisely so those are checkable rather than promised.
the CLV legs telescope — +2.62% waiting + −1.53% drift = +1.09% raw
✓Passed:all 673 timestamped plays were priced before the game started
✓Passed:all 87 voids settle at exactly 0 — none of them moves the record
✓Passed:every logged row still carries its date and its outcome
✓Passed:the rate gate is n=20, the same constant every StatIQ surface uses
What this page deliberately does not do. It does not score the probability we published against what happened, and it does not repeat the backtests — that is the model report card, and printing the same calibration table in two places is how two surfaces start to disagree. Likewise the itemised list of every price we ever locked, including the measurement-only ones that are not in this record, is the CLV audit. This page answers exactly one question: what happened to the plays we published?
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.94%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.94%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +0.94% = +0.94%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.47% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game40¢
With Kalshi’s fee42¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Kalshi ask, pre-game36¢
With Kalshi’s fee38¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.34%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.34%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game44¢
With Kalshi’s fee46¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+0.93%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.24%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.24%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −0.24% = −0.24%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.93% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game50¢
With Kalshi’s fee52¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.27%
…of which: waiting paid+6.52%
…of which: market drift−3.25%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.52% + −3.25% = +3.27%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.11% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.71%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−1.71%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −1.71% = −1.71%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.66% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game45¢
With Kalshi’s fee47¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.40%
…of which: waiting paid+3.57%
…of which: market drift−2.16%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.57% + −2.16% = +1.40%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.57% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game52¢
With Kalshi’s fee54¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.41%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−1.41%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −1.41% = −1.41%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.69% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game99¢
With Kalshi’s fee100¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Kalshi ask, pre-game
99¢
With Kalshi’s fee100¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−1.74%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.11%
…of which: waiting paid+3.96%
…of which: market drift−5.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.96% + −5.07% = −1.11%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.74% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.53%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+6.24%
…of which: market drift−6.24%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.24% + −6.24% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.53% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+0.93%
…of which: waiting paid+2.66%
…of which: market drift−1.74%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game93¢
With Kalshi’s fee94¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.48%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.48%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +3.48% = +3.48%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.71% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game60¢
With Kalshi’s fee62¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.27%
…of which: waiting paid+8.49%
…of which: market drift−4.21%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.49% + −4.21% = +4.27%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.30% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.49%
…of which: waiting paid−1.89%
…of which: market drift−0.60%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (−1.89% + −0.60% = −2.49%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.21% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.89%
…of which: waiting paid+2.45%
…of which: market drift−3.34%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.45% + −3.34% = −0.89%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.53% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.98%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.98%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game64¢
With Kalshi’s fee66¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+5.62%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+5.62%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.49%
…of which: waiting paid+3.25%
…of which: market drift+0.24%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.25% + +0.24% = +3.49%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.63% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + 0.00% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The 0.00% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+3.25%
…of which: market drift−3.25%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.25% + −3.25% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.52% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+3.99%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.70%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game68¢
With Kalshi’s fee70¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−0.24%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.65%
…of which: waiting paid+0.63%
…of which: market drift−1.28%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.63% + −1.28% = −0.65%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.24% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game62¢
With Kalshi’s fee64¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.23%
…of which: waiting paid+1.15%
…of which: market drift+2.08%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.15% + +2.08% = +3.23%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.77% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game62¢
With Kalshi’s fee64¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.23%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.23%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.23% = +1.23%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.91% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game65¢
With Kalshi’s fee67¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.92%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game73¢
With Kalshi’s fee75¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.54%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−1.54%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −1.54% = −1.54%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.88% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game71¢
With Kalshi’s fee73¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.40%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game69¢
With Kalshi’s fee71¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.44%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game68¢
With Kalshi’s fee70¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.70%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.70%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −0.70% = −0.70%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.64% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game73¢
With Kalshi’s fee75¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game69¢
With Kalshi’s fee71¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+2.52%
…of which: market drift−2.52%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.52% + −2.52% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.10% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game62¢
With Kalshi’s fee64¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.16%
…of which: waiting paid+3.15%
…of which: market drift−5.31%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.15% + −5.31% = −2.16%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.16% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game62¢
With Kalshi’s fee64¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.57%
…of which: waiting paid+2.16%
…of which: market drift+1.40%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.16% + +1.40% = +3.57%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.22% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game55¢
With Kalshi’s fee57¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.73%
…of which: waiting paid+5.13%
…of which: market drift−4.40%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.13% + −4.40% = +0.73%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.00% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game99¢
With Kalshi’s fee100¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.15%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.15%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.15% = +1.15%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.65% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game67¢
With Kalshi’s fee69¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.32%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.32%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +0.32% = +0.32%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.05% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game41¢
With Kalshi’s fee43¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+8.33%
…of which: market drift−8.33%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.33% + −8.33% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.16% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.69%
…of which: waiting paid+3.18%
…of which: market drift+0.51%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.18% + +0.51% = +3.69%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.75% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.22%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.22%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.22% = +1.22%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.09% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game52¢
With Kalshi’s fee54¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+5.02%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.38%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.38%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +2.38% = +2.38%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.16% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.81%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.81%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.81% = +1.81%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.73% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game44¢
With Kalshi’s fee46¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.37%
…of which: waiting paid+0.89%
…of which: market drift−1.25%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.89% + −1.25% = −0.37%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.39% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game60¢
With Kalshi’s fee62¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−1.74%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.71%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−1.71%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −1.71% = −1.71%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.74% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game41¢
With Kalshi’s fee43¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.45%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−1.45%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −1.45% = −1.45%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.23% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game22¢
With Kalshi’s fee24¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−2.90%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−2.90%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game54¢
With Kalshi’s fee56¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−3.61%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−3.14%
…of which: waiting paid+2.27%
…of which: market drift−5.41%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.27% + −5.41% = −3.14%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.61% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game49¢
With Kalshi’s fee51¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−2.56%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.42%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.42%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −0.42% = −0.42%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.56% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.40%
…of which: waiting paid+5.95%
…of which: market drift−7.35%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.95% + −7.35% = −1.40%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.79% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game51¢
With Kalshi’s fee53¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.49%
…of which: waiting paid+5.54%
…of which: market drift−2.04%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.54% + −2.04% = +3.49%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.81% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game99¢
With Kalshi’s fee100¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−0.97%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.46%
…of which: waiting paid+1.22%
…of which: market drift−2.68%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.22% + −2.68% = −1.46%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.97% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game46¢
With Kalshi’s fee48¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.68%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.68%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −0.68% = −0.68%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.04% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game42¢
With Kalshi’s fee44¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.69%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.69%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +3.69% = +3.69%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.02% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+5.30%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+5.30%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−3.50%
…of which: waiting paid+4.85%
…of which: market drift−8.35%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.85% + −8.35% = −3.50%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.77% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game61¢
With Kalshi’s fee63¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.59%
…of which: waiting paid+5.44%
…of which: market drift−3.85%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.44% + −3.85% = +1.59%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.64% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game99¢
With Kalshi’s fee100¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.79%
…of which: waiting paid+5.03%
…of which: market drift−0.25%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.03% + −0.25% = +4.79%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +4.11% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game58¢
With Kalshi’s fee60¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + 0.00% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The 0.00% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.16%
…of which: waiting paid+3.60%
…of which: market drift−2.44%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.60% + −2.44% = +1.16%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.46% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game47¢
With Kalshi’s fee49¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+3.16%
…of which: waiting paid+5.25%
…of which: market drift−2.08%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game99¢
With Kalshi’s fee100¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.55%
…of which: waiting paid+2.07%
…of which: market drift−1.53%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.07% + −1.53% = +0.55%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.58% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game42¢
With Kalshi’s fee44¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.73%
…of which: waiting paid+3.57%
…of which: market drift−2.84%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.57% + −2.84% = +0.73%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.17% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game64¢
With Kalshi’s fee66¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.24%
…of which: waiting paid+3.24%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.24% + 0.00% = +3.24%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.96% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.78%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.67%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.67%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.67% = +1.67%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.78% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.14%
…of which: waiting paid+1.84%
…of which: market drift−2.98%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.84% + −2.98% = −1.14%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.49% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game43¢
With Kalshi’s fee45¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.53%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+13.29%
…of which: waiting paid+7.59%
…of which: market drift+5.70%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.59% + +5.70% = +13.29%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.53% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+0.25%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.25%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.25%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +2.25% = +2.25%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.25% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game62¢
With Kalshi’s fee64¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+3.47%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+3.47%
…of which: waiting paid+7.74%
…of which: market drift−4.27%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+5.07%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+5.07%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+5.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game48¢
With Kalshi’s fee50¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.98%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.98%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.98% = +1.98%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.88% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game43¢
With Kalshi’s fee45¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.01%
…of which: waiting paid+1.01%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.01% + 0.00% = +1.01%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.17% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+0.22%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.11%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.11%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.11% = +1.11%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.22% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game47¢
With Kalshi’s fee49¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.40%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.40%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.40% = +1.40%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.21% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game46¢
With Kalshi’s fee48¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.47%
…of which: waiting paid+4.27%
…of which: market drift−2.80%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.27% + −2.80% = +1.47%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.26% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game47¢
With Kalshi’s fee49¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+5.56%
…of which: waiting paid+8.33%
…of which: market drift−2.78%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.33% + −2.78% = +5.56%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +5.53% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−4.34%
…of which: waiting paid+7.41%
…of which: market drift−11.74%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.41% + −11.74% = −4.34%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −4.41% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.48%
…of which: waiting paid+5.74%
…of which: market drift−2.26%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.74% + −2.26% = +3.48%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.99% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game94¢
With Kalshi’s fee95¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.97%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.97%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −0.97% = −0.97%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.18% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.74%
…of which: waiting paid+2.49%
…of which: market drift−1.75%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.49% + −1.75% = +0.74%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.30% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game95¢
With Kalshi’s fee96¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.07%
…of which: waiting paid+8.25%
…of which: market drift−7.18%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.25% + −7.18% = +1.07%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.64% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.08%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.20%
…of which: waiting paid+1.20%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.20% + 0.00% = +1.20%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.08% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.91%
…of which: waiting paid+3.06%
…of which: market drift−0.15%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.06% + −0.15% = +2.91%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.14% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game61¢
With Kalshi’s fee63¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.45%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.60%
…of which: waiting paid+5.10%
…of which: market drift−3.50%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.10% + −3.50% = +1.60%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.95% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game64¢
With Kalshi’s fee66¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.16%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.50%
…of which: waiting paid+4.29%
…of which: market drift−0.78%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.29% + −0.78% = +3.50%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.34% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game98¢
With Kalshi’s fee99¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.26%
…of which: waiting paid+3.64%
…of which: market drift−1.37%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.64% + −1.37% = +2.26%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.40% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game62¢
With Kalshi’s fee64¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.48%
…of which: waiting paid−0.78%
…of which: market drift+2.26%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (−0.78% + +2.26% = +1.48%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.58% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.54%
…of which: waiting paid+3.98%
…of which: market drift−5.52%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.98% + −5.52% = −1.54%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.01% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game67¢
With Kalshi’s fee69¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.58%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.58%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −0.58% = −0.58%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.45% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game61¢
With Kalshi’s fee63¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.37%
…of which: waiting paid+2.65%
…of which: market drift−1.28%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.65% + −1.28% = +1.37%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.42% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game61¢
With Kalshi’s fee63¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.02%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.02%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +2.02% = +2.02%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.26% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.02%
…of which: waiting paid+3.25%
…of which: market drift−1.23%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.25% + −1.23% = +2.02%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.06% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game98¢
With Kalshi’s fee99¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+6.05%
…of which: market drift−6.05%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.05% + −6.05% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.88% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game98¢
With Kalshi’s fee99¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.15%
…of which: waiting paid+0.93%
…of which: market drift+0.22%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.93% + +0.22% = +1.15%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.12% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game73¢
With Kalshi’s fee75¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.15%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.15%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.15% = +1.15%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.40% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game67¢
With Kalshi’s fee69¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.08%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game94¢
With Kalshi’s fee95¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game70¢
With Kalshi’s fee72¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game67¢
With Kalshi’s fee69¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−4.21%
…of which: waiting paid+1.84%
…of which: market drift−6.05%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.84% + −6.05% = −4.21%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.99% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game66¢
With Kalshi’s fee68¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game69¢
With Kalshi’s fee71¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+1.27%
…of which: market drift−1.27%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.27% + −1.27% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.38% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game44¢
With Kalshi’s fee46¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.10%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+5.87%
…of which: market drift−5.87%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.87% + −5.87% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.88% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game47¢
With Kalshi’s fee49¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−1.52%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.22%
…of which: waiting paid+1.42%
…of which: market drift−2.65%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.42% + −2.65% = −1.22%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.52% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+8.90%
…of which: market drift−8.90%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.90% + −8.90% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.38% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game43¢
With Kalshi’s fee45¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.55%
…of which: waiting paid+9.18%
…of which: market drift−4.64%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+9.18% + −4.64% = +4.55%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.39% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game54¢
With Kalshi’s fee56¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+1.54%
…of which: market drift−1.54%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.54% + −1.54% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.35% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game60¢
With Kalshi’s fee62¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−1.53%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−1.53%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game69¢
With Kalshi’s fee71¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.75%
…of which: waiting paid+2.10%
…of which: market drift−2.85%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.10% + −2.85% = −0.75%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.18% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game61¢
With Kalshi’s fee63¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.01%
…of which: waiting paid+4.45%
…of which: market drift−6.47%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.45% + −6.47% = −2.01%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.62% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game64¢
With Kalshi’s fee66¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−0.40%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+0.73%
…of which: market drift−0.73%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.73% + −0.73% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.40% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game62¢
With Kalshi’s fee64¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.29%
…of which: waiting paid+3.56%
…of which: market drift−3.85%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.56% + −3.85% = −0.29%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.06% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game37¢
With Kalshi’s fee39¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+8.03%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+8.03%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game53¢
With Kalshi’s fee55¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.60%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−1.60%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −1.60% = −1.60%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.74% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game43¢
With Kalshi’s fee45¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+0.03%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.79%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.79%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +3.79% = +3.79%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.03% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.46%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.46%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −0.46% = −0.46%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.06% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game50¢
With Kalshi’s fee52¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.01%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.01%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+3.36%
…of which: market drift−3.36%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.36% + −3.36% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.17% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game47¢
With Kalshi’s fee49¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.73%
…of which: waiting paid+2.02%
…of which: market drift−2.75%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game64¢
With Kalshi’s fee66¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.02%
…of which: waiting paid+3.61%
…of which: market drift−4.64%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.61% + −4.64% = −1.02%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.13% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game31¢
With Kalshi’s fee33¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.49%
…of which: waiting paid+4.55%
…of which: market drift−3.05%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.55% + −3.05% = +1.49%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.71% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game46¢
With Kalshi’s fee48¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.07%
…of which: waiting paid+4.34%
…of which: market drift−2.27%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.34% + −2.27% = +2.07%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.47% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game47¢
With Kalshi’s fee49¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.16%
…of which: waiting paid+2.26%
…of which: market drift−2.10%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.26% + −2.10% = +0.16%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.49% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game62¢
With Kalshi’s fee64¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−0.48%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.42%
…of which: waiting paid+3.33%
…of which: market drift−2.91%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.33% + −2.91% = +0.42%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.48% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game46¢
With Kalshi’s fee48¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid−1.62%
…of which: market drift+1.62%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game99¢
With Kalshi’s fee100¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Kalshi ask, pre-game35¢
With Kalshi’s fee37¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.08%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.08%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.08% = +1.08%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.02% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game69¢
With Kalshi’s fee71¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−3.47%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.57%
…of which: waiting paid+1.32%
…of which: market drift−2.90%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.32% + −2.90% = −1.57%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.47% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.18%
…of which: waiting paid+5.95%
…of which: market drift−4.77%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.95% + −4.77% = +1.18%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.43% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.92%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.92%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +3.92% = +3.92%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.74% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+7.82%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+7.82%
…of which: waiting paid+10.10%
…of which: market drift−2.28%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+0.90%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.51%
…of which: waiting paid+6.98%
…of which: market drift−4.47%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.98% + −4.47% = +2.51%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.90% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.84%
…of which: waiting paid+3.96%
…of which: market drift−4.80%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game45¢
With Kalshi’s fee47¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.68%
…of which: waiting paid+0.18%
…of which: market drift+1.50%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.18% + +1.50% = +1.68%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.25% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game43¢
With Kalshi’s fee45¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+3.96%
…of which: market drift−3.96%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.96% + −3.96% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The 0.00% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game43¢
With Kalshi’s fee45¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.54%
…of which: waiting paid+2.29%
…of which: market drift−2.83%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.29% + −2.83% = −0.54%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.31% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game44¢
With Kalshi’s fee46¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.37%
…of which: waiting paid+3.03%
…of which: market drift−3.41%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.03% + −3.41% = −0.37%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.99% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game44¢
With Kalshi’s fee46¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.26%
…of which: waiting paid+3.37%
…of which: market drift−1.11%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.37% + −1.11% = +2.26%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.44% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game52¢
With Kalshi’s fee54¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.85%
…of which: waiting paid+3.33%
…of which: market drift−0.47%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.33% + −0.47% = +2.85%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.51% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game51¢
With Kalshi’s fee53¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.57%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.57%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game49¢
With Kalshi’s fee51¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.16%
…of which: waiting paid+5.87%
…of which: market drift−8.03%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.87% + −8.03% = −2.16%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.29% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.40%
…of which: waiting paid+2.38%
…of which: market drift−0.98%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.38% + −0.98% = +1.40%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.03% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game73¢
With Kalshi’s fee75¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.38%
…of which: waiting paid+8.33%
…of which: market drift−10.71%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.33% + −10.71% = −2.38%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.28% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.49%
…of which: waiting paid+4.55%
…of which: market drift−1.06%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.55% + −1.06% = +3.49%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.63% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game54¢
With Kalshi’s fee56¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.22%
…of which: waiting paid+4.14%
…of which: market drift−5.36%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.14% + −5.36% = −1.22%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.04% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game74¢
With Kalshi’s fee76¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+7.46%
…of which: waiting paid+3.17%
…of which: market drift+4.28%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.17% + +4.28% = +7.46%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +4.24% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.90%
…of which: waiting paid+4.47%
…of which: market drift−1.57%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.47% + −1.57% = +2.90%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.53% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+6.99%
…of which: waiting paid+5.13%
…of which: market drift+1.86%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.81%
…of which: waiting paid+2.33%
…of which: market drift−0.51%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.33% + −0.51% = +1.81%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.33% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.60%
…of which: waiting paid+1.67%
…of which: market drift+0.94%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.67% + +0.94% = +2.60%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.21% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game62¢
With Kalshi’s fee64¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.40%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.26%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.26%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +2.26% = +2.26%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.32% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.14%
…of which: waiting paid+5.83%
…of which: market drift−5.68%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.83% + −5.68% = +0.14%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.05% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game61¢
With Kalshi’s fee63¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.84%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid−0.14%
…of which: market drift+0.14%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (−0.14% + +0.14% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The 0.00% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.84%
…of which: waiting paid+0.81%
…of which: market drift−1.65%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.81% + −1.65% = −0.84%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.36% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game61¢
With Kalshi’s fee63¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.70%
…of which: waiting paid+6.27%
…of which: market drift−2.56%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.27% + −2.56% = +3.70%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.92% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.75%
…of which: waiting paid+6.00%
…of which: market drift−3.24%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.00% + −3.24% = +2.75%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.17% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game66¢
With Kalshi’s fee68¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+5.73%
…of which: waiting paid+5.82%
…of which: market drift−0.09%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game68¢
With Kalshi’s fee70¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−4.62%
…of which: waiting paid+3.03%
…of which: market drift−7.65%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game66¢
With Kalshi’s fee68¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.23%
…of which: waiting paid+5.86%
…of which: market drift−4.63%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.86% + −4.63% = +1.23%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.17% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game65¢
With Kalshi’s fee67¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.20%
…of which: waiting paid+0.73%
…of which: market drift+0.47%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.73% + +0.47% = +1.20%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.01% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game66¢
With Kalshi’s fee68¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game68¢
With Kalshi’s fee70¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−1.06%
…of which: waiting paid+6.98%
…of which: market drift−8.03%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game48¢
With Kalshi’s fee50¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.40%
…of which: waiting paid+2.50%
…of which: market drift−2.11%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.50% + −2.11% = +0.40%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.88% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−3.42%
…of which: waiting paid−1.78%
…of which: market drift−1.63%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (−1.78% + −1.63% = −3.42%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.22% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game38¢
With Kalshi’s fee40¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+6.63%
…of which: market drift−6.63%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.63% + −6.63% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.29% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−2.74%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.20%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−1.20%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −1.20% = −1.20%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.74% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.54%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.54%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.54% = +1.54%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.62% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+0.45%
…of which: waiting paid+3.17%
…of which: market drift−2.73%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.35%
…of which: waiting paid+0.53%
…of which: market drift−0.18%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.53% + −0.18% = +0.35%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.10% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.09%
…of which: waiting paid+6.30%
…of which: market drift−5.21%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.30% + −5.21% = +1.09%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.12% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game47¢
With Kalshi’s fee49¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.38%
…of which: waiting paid+2.78%
…of which: market drift+0.60%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.78% + +0.60% = +3.38%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.68% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.91%
…of which: waiting paid+3.39%
…of which: market drift−4.31%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.39% + −4.31% = −0.91%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.84% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.08%
…of which: waiting paid+11.12%
…of which: market drift−8.03%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+11.12% + −8.03% = +3.08%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.61% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game43¢
With Kalshi’s fee45¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.88%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.88%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.88% = +1.88%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.11% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game66¢
With Kalshi’s fee68¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.67%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.67%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.67% = +1.67%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.76% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game53¢
With Kalshi’s fee55¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.39%
…of which: waiting paid+3.52%
…of which: market drift−4.91%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.52% + −4.91% = −1.39%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.25% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game62¢
With Kalshi’s fee64¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.03%
…of which: waiting paid+3.03%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.03% + 0.00% = +3.03%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.96% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game76¢
With Kalshi’s fee78¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.72%
…of which: waiting paid+9.90%
…of which: market drift−11.63%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+9.90% + −11.63% = −1.72%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.46% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.89%
…of which: waiting paid+2.19%
…of which: market drift−1.31%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.19% + −1.31% = +0.89%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.87% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.83%
…of which: waiting paid+8.61%
…of which: market drift−6.78%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.61% + −6.78% = +1.83%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.14% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game47¢
With Kalshi’s fee49¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.35%
…of which: waiting paid+3.09%
…of which: market drift−5.44%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.09% + −5.44% = −2.35%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.71% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game42¢
With Kalshi’s fee44¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.42%
…of which: waiting paid+1.24%
…of which: market drift+0.18%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.24% + +0.18% = +1.42%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.54% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game43¢
With Kalshi’s fee45¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+5.07%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+5.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +5.07% = +5.07%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.51% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.90%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game66¢
With Kalshi’s fee68¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.84%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.66%
…of which: waiting paid+1.81%
…of which: market drift+0.85%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.81% + +0.85% = +2.66%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.84% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.18%
…of which: waiting paid+2.25%
…of which: market drift−2.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.25% + −2.07% = +0.18%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.21% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game71¢
With Kalshi’s fee73¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.51%
…of which: waiting paid+3.78%
…of which: market drift−2.26%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.78% + −2.26% = +1.51%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.85% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game42¢
With Kalshi’s fee44¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.16%
…of which: waiting paid+3.17%
…of which: market drift−1.01%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.17% + −1.01% = +2.16%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.81% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game53¢
With Kalshi’s fee55¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+3.07%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+3.07%
…of which: waiting paid+1.13%
…of which: market drift+1.93%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.61%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.61%
…of which: waiting paid+6.23%
…of which: market drift−4.62%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.00%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.60%
…of which: waiting paid+3.60%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.60% + 0.00% = +3.60%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.00% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.41%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.22%
…of which: waiting paid+1.89%
…of which: market drift+0.33%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.89% + +0.33% = +2.22%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.41% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−0.06%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.06%
…of which: waiting paid+2.16%
…of which: market drift−1.11%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.16% + −1.11% = +1.06%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.06% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−0.60%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.36%
…of which: waiting paid+3.71%
…of which: market drift−3.35%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.71% + −3.35% = +0.36%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.60% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−1.70%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−1.70%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−1.70%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.41%
…of which: waiting paid+2.16%
…of which: market drift−2.57%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.16% + −2.57% = −0.41%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.45% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game43¢
With Kalshi’s fee45¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.84%
…of which: waiting paid+3.70%
…of which: market drift−4.55%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.70% + −4.55% = −0.84%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.16% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game44¢
With Kalshi’s fee46¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.27%
…of which: waiting paid+4.49%
…of which: market drift−1.22%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.49% + −1.22% = +3.27%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.79% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game47¢
With Kalshi’s fee49¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.83%
…of which: waiting paid+4.05%
…of which: market drift−1.22%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.05% + −1.22% = +2.83%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.04% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game50¢
With Kalshi’s fee52¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−3.36%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−3.36%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −3.36% = −3.36%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.88% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game49¢
With Kalshi’s fee51¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.31%
…of which: waiting paid+8.15%
…of which: market drift−6.84%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.15% + −6.84% = +1.31%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.57% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game58¢
With Kalshi’s fee60¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+4.12%
…of which: market drift−4.12%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.12% + −4.12% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.43% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.75%
…of which: waiting paid+3.45%
…of which: market drift−0.70%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.45% + −0.70% = +2.75%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.67% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game63¢
With Kalshi’s fee65¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.25%
…of which: waiting paid+3.37%
…of which: market drift−0.12%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.37% + −0.12% = +3.25%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.65% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game65¢
With Kalshi’s fee67¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game1¢
With Kalshi’s fee2¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
0.00%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + 0.00% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The 0.00% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.70%
…of which: waiting paid+3.14%
…of which: market drift−3.84%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.14% + −3.84% = −0.70%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.36% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game79¢
With Kalshi’s fee81¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.15%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game70¢
With Kalshi’s fee72¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.01%
…of which: waiting paid+7.15%
…of which: market drift−8.16%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.15% + −8.16% = −1.01%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.37% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game73¢
With Kalshi’s fee75¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.37%
…of which: waiting paid−0.37%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (−0.37% + 0.00% = −0.37%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.11% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game39¢
With Kalshi’s fee41¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.11%
…of which: waiting paid+1.11%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.11% + 0.00% = +1.11%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.71% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game40¢
With Kalshi’s fee42¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.72%
…of which: waiting paid+3.81%
…of which: market drift−3.09%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.81% + −3.09% = +0.72%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.35% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.88%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game67¢
With Kalshi’s fee69¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.48%
…of which: waiting paid+5.07%
…of which: market drift−3.59%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game68¢
With Kalshi’s fee70¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.73%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+4.73%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +4.73% = +4.73%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +4.91% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game39¢
With Kalshi’s fee41¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.17%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.17%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −0.17% = −0.17%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.10% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game42¢
With Kalshi’s fee44¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.17%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.17%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game59¢
With Kalshi’s fee61¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+3.99%
…of which: waiting paid+8.99%
…of which: market drift−5.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game61¢
With Kalshi’s fee63¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.31%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.35%
…of which: waiting paid+6.33%
…of which: market drift−3.98%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.33% + −3.98% = +2.35%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.31% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.89%
…of which: waiting paid+5.95%
…of which: market drift−5.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.95% + −5.07% = +0.89%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.99% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game42¢
With Kalshi’s fee44¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.39%
…of which: waiting paid+0.17%
…of which: market drift+2.21%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.17% + +2.21% = +2.39%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.65% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game43¢
With Kalshi’s fee45¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.62%
…of which: waiting paid+3.09%
…of which: market drift−0.47%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.09% + −0.47% = +2.62%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.32% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game47¢
With Kalshi’s fee49¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.94%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.94%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.94% = +1.94%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.46% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game46¢
With Kalshi’s fee48¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.06%
…of which: waiting paid+2.27%
…of which: market drift−3.33%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.27% + −3.33% = −1.06%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.57% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game46¢
With Kalshi’s fee48¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+4.76%
…of which: market drift−4.76%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.76% + −4.76% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The 0.00% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+7.94%
…of which: market drift−7.94%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.94% + −7.94% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.19% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game49¢
With Kalshi’s fee51¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.38%
…of which: waiting paid+4.55%
…of which: market drift−2.16%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.55% + −2.16% = +2.38%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.82% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game51¢
With Kalshi’s fee53¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.09%
…of which: waiting paid+7.59%
…of which: market drift−5.50%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.59% + −5.50% = +2.09%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.61% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.66%
…of which: waiting paid+2.73%
…of which: market drift−2.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.73% + −2.07% = +0.66%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.41% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.06%
…of which: waiting paid−2.75%
…of which: market drift+3.81%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (−2.75% + +3.81% = +1.06%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.13% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.07%
…of which: waiting paid+7.62%
…of which: market drift−3.56%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.62% + −3.56% = +4.07%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.57% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game57¢
With Kalshi’s fee59¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Kalshi ask, pre-game
61¢
With Kalshi’s fee63¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.93%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.93%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +0.93% = +0.93%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.69% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game56¢
With Kalshi’s fee58¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.82%
…of which: waiting paid+2.55%
…of which: market drift+2.26%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.55% + +2.26% = +4.82%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.99% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game97¢
With Kalshi’s fee98¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.17%
…of which: waiting paid+3.03%
…of which: market drift−3.21%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.03% + −3.21% = −0.17%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.29% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game61¢
With Kalshi’s fee63¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.86%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.86%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +2.86% = +2.86%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.49% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game62¢
With Kalshi’s fee64¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.34%
…of which: waiting paid+4.79%
…of which: market drift−5.13%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.79% + −5.13% = −0.34%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.95% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.55%
…of which: waiting paid+2.42%
…of which: market drift−0.87%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.42% + −0.87% = +1.55%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.09% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.39%
…of which: waiting paid+6.83%
…of which: market drift−9.22%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.83% + −9.22% = −2.39%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.61% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.12%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game61¢
With Kalshi’s fee63¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.86%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.26%
…of which: waiting paid+3.64%
…of which: market drift−1.37%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.64% + −1.37% = +2.26%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.86% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game63¢
With Kalshi’s fee65¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.48%
…of which: waiting paid+3.50%
…of which: market drift−2.02%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.50% + −2.02% = +1.48%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.06% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game63¢
With Kalshi’s fee65¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.98%
…of which: waiting paid+2.18%
…of which: market drift−5.16%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.18% + −5.16% = −2.98%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.35% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game59¢
With Kalshi’s fee61¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.85%
…of which: waiting paid+3.50%
…of which: market drift−0.65%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.50% + −0.65% = +2.85%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.47% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game58¢
With Kalshi’s fee60¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−0.77%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.62%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.70%
…of which: waiting paid+0.73%
…of which: market drift−2.42%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.73% + −2.42% = −1.70%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.53% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.45%
…of which: waiting paid+3.69%
…of which: market drift−1.23%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game63¢
With Kalshi’s fee65¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.73%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game69¢
With Kalshi’s fee71¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+5.22%
…of which: waiting paid+3.47%
…of which: market drift+1.75%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.47% + +1.75% = +5.22%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.07% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game69¢
With Kalshi’s fee71¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.94%
…of which: waiting paid+6.15%
…of which: market drift−5.21%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.15% + −5.21% = +0.94%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.22% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game68¢
With Kalshi’s fee70¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.88%
…of which: waiting paid+3.62%
…of which: market drift−5.50%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.62% + −5.50% = −1.88%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.01% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game63¢
With Kalshi’s fee65¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game69¢
With Kalshi’s fee71¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.56%
…of which: waiting paid+4.35%
…of which: market drift−1.78%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game69¢
With Kalshi’s fee71¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.38%
…of which: waiting paid+3.12%
…of which: market drift−0.74%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.12% + −0.74% = +2.38%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.21% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game51¢
With Kalshi’s fee53¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.75%
…of which: waiting paid+3.37%
…of which: market drift−0.63%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.37% + −0.63% = +2.75%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.02% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.20%
…of which: waiting paid+5.87%
…of which: market drift−3.67%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.87% + −3.67% = +2.20%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.29% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.79%
…of which: waiting paid+0.89%
…of which: market drift+2.90%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.89% + +2.90% = +3.79%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.85% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game43¢
With Kalshi’s fee45¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−3.23%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−4.14%
…of which: waiting paid+1.81%
…of which: market drift−5.95%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.81% + −5.95% = −4.14%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.23% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game56¢
With Kalshi’s fee58¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.46%
…of which: waiting paid−0.17%
…of which: market drift+3.63%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (−0.17% + +3.63% = +3.46%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +4.43% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game41¢
With Kalshi’s fee43¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−3.44%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−3.44%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −3.44% = −3.44%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.56% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game43¢
With Kalshi’s fee45¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.60%
…of which: waiting paid+5.95%
…of which: market drift−3.35%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.95% + −3.35% = +2.60%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.34% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game61¢
With Kalshi’s fee63¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
0.00%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+4.55%
…of which: market drift−4.55%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game48¢
With Kalshi’s fee50¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+5.65%
…of which: waiting paid+4.45%
…of which: market drift+1.19%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game60¢
With Kalshi’s fee62¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.11%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−1.11%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −1.11% = −1.11%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.52% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.81%
…of which: waiting paid−1.98%
…of which: market drift+3.79%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (−1.98% + +3.79% = +1.81%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.04% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game57¢
With Kalshi’s fee59¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.47%
…of which: waiting paid+3.42%
…of which: market drift−1.94%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.42% + −1.94% = +1.47%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.07% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game63¢
With Kalshi’s fee65¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.07%
…of which: waiting paid+0.88%
…of which: market drift−2.95%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.88% + −2.95% = −2.07%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.90% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game46¢
With Kalshi’s fee48¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
0.00%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + 0.00% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The 0.00% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game49¢
With Kalshi’s fee51¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+0.61%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + 0.00% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.61% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game44¢
With Kalshi’s fee46¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.11%
…of which: waiting paid+0.66%
…of which: market drift+0.45%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.66% + +0.45% = +1.11%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.53% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game47¢
With Kalshi’s fee49¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.98%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.98%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.98% = +1.98%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.27% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.07%
…of which: waiting paid+6.06%
…of which: market drift−3.99%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.06% + −3.99% = +2.07%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.65% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game70¢
With Kalshi’s fee72¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.01%
…of which: waiting paid+3.17%
…of which: market drift−2.16%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.17% + −2.16% = +1.01%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.85% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game45¢
With Kalshi’s fee47¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+3.66%
…of which: waiting paid+6.18%
…of which: market drift−2.52%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game58¢
With Kalshi’s fee60¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.34%
…of which: waiting paid+6.06%
…of which: market drift−4.72%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.06% + −4.72% = +1.34%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.14% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game62¢
With Kalshi’s fee64¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+0.95%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid−2.27%
…of which: market drift+2.27%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (−2.27% + +2.27% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.95% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game45¢
With Kalshi’s fee47¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.31%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.31%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.31% = +1.31%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.97% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game41¢
With Kalshi’s fee43¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.93%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + 0.00% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.19% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game64¢
With Kalshi’s fee66¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.23%
…of which: waiting paid+3.60%
…of which: market drift−3.83%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.60% + −3.83% = −0.23%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.07% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game46¢
With Kalshi’s fee48¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+4.37%
…of which: market drift−4.37%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.37% + −4.37% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.08% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game69¢
With Kalshi’s fee71¢
Counted in the price comparisonyes
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.67%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Exchange cross-check
Kalshi ask, pre-game96¢
With Kalshi’s fee97¢
Counted in the price comparisonno — outside the fillable 5−95¢ band
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.88%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+6.14%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+6.14%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +6.14% = +6.14%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.88% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.81%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.12%
…of which: waiting paid+2.16%
…of which: market drift+0.97%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.16% + +0.97% = +3.12%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.81% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.16%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.16%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +3.16% = +3.16%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.83% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.97%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.97%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −0.97% = −0.97%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.09% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.07%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +2.07% = +2.07%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.09% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+4.23%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+4.23%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.27%
…of which: waiting paid+5.19%
…of which: market drift−1.92%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.19% + −1.92% = +3.27%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.22% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.61%
…of which: waiting paid−1.09%
…of which: market drift+2.70%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (−1.09% + +2.70% = +1.61%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.85% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.83%
…of which: waiting paid+5.56%
…of which: market drift−8.39%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.56% + −8.39% = −2.83%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.22% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.57%
…of which: waiting paid+3.37%
…of which: market drift+0.19%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.37% + +0.19% = +3.57%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.64% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.11%
…of which: waiting paid+3.96%
…of which: market drift−5.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.96% + −5.07% = −1.11%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.89% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.98%
…of which: waiting paid+2.66%
…of which: market drift−4.64%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.66% + −4.64% = −1.98%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.07% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.23%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.16%
…of which: waiting paid+4.26%
…of which: market drift−1.11%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.26% + −1.11% = +3.16%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.23% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−1.54%
…of which: waiting paid+4.64%
…of which: market drift−6.18%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.93%
…of which: waiting paid+7.47%
…of which: market drift−8.39%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.47% + −8.39% = −0.93%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.77% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.81%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.17%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.17%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.32%
…of which: waiting paid+6.84%
…of which: market drift−5.52%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.84% + −5.52% = +1.32%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.55% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.27%
…of which: waiting paid+6.19%
…of which: market drift−6.46%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.19% + −6.46% = −0.27%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.89% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.81%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.81%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −0.81% = −0.81%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.82% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−3.70%
…of which: waiting paid+5.48%
…of which: market drift−9.18%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.48% + −9.18% = −3.70%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.33% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.20%
…of which: waiting paid+2.20%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.20% + 0.00% = +2.20%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.39% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.26%
…of which: waiting paid+3.48%
…of which: market drift+0.78%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.48% + +0.78% = +4.26%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.61% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+6.22%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+7.09%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.48%
…of which: waiting paid+5.02%
…of which: market drift−1.54%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.02% + −1.54% = +3.48%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.69% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.18%
…of which: waiting paid+1.81%
…of which: market drift−2.99%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.81% + −2.99% = −1.18%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.05% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.23%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.23%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +3.23% = +3.23%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.38% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.51%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.59%
…of which: waiting paid+0.75%
…of which: market drift+1.83%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.75% + +1.83% = +2.59%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.51% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.73%
…of which: waiting paid+0.73%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.73% + 0.00% = +0.73%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.97% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+10.10%
…of which: market drift−10.10%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+10.10% + −10.10% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.36% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.61%
…of which: waiting paid+8.16%
…of which: market drift−5.56%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.16% + −5.56% = +2.61%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.34% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.13%
…of which: waiting paid+9.34%
…of which: market drift−9.47%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+3.25%
…of which: market drift−3.25%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.25% + −3.25% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.90% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.75%
…of which: waiting paid+7.09%
…of which: market drift−3.34%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.09% + −3.34% = +3.75%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.73% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.22%
…of which: waiting paid+2.38%
…of which: market drift−3.60%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.38% + −3.60% = −1.22%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.62% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.25%
…of which: waiting paid+8.33%
…of which: market drift−7.08%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.33% + −7.08% = +1.25%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.30% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.97%
…of which: waiting paid+3.03%
…of which: market drift−2.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.03% + −2.07% = +0.97%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.36% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+4.20%
…of which: waiting paid+4.72%
…of which: market drift−0.51%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+5.76%
…of which: market drift−5.76%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.76% + −5.76% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.04% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.93%
…of which: waiting paid+3.46%
…of which: market drift−1.53%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.46% + −1.53% = +1.93%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.01% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.22%
…of which: waiting paid+1.92%
…of which: market drift−0.70%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.92% + −0.70% = +1.22%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.60% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.80%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.80%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +0.80% = +0.80%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.07% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+5.36%
…of which: waiting paid+5.70%
…of which: market drift−0.34%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.70% + −0.34% = +5.36%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.84% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−3.70%
…of which: waiting paid+3.90%
…of which: market drift−7.60%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.90% + −7.60% = −3.70%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.34% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.71%
…of which: waiting paid+4.88%
…of which: market drift−3.17%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.88% + −3.17% = +1.71%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.41% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.14%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.14%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +3.14% = +3.14%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.98% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.67%
…of which: waiting paid+4.14%
…of which: market drift−1.47%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.14% + −1.47% = +2.67%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.41% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.34%
…of which: waiting paid+4.79%
…of which: market drift−5.13%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.79% + −5.13% = −0.34%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.69% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.10%
…of which: waiting paid+3.00%
…of which: market drift−0.90%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.00% + −0.90% = +2.10%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.68% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.16%
…of which: waiting paid+2.38%
…of which: market drift−1.22%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.38% + −1.22% = +1.16%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.16% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.19%
…of which: waiting paid+5.18%
…of which: market drift−2.99%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.18% + −2.99% = +2.19%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.69% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.68%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.70%
…of which: waiting paid+2.70%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.70% + 0.00% = +2.70%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.68% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.93%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.22%
…of which: waiting paid+7.46%
…of which: market drift−5.23%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.46% + −5.23% = +2.22%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.93% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+5.68%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+5.68%
…of which: waiting paid+4.45%
…of which: market drift+1.23%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−0.95%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.95%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.95%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−3.17%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−3.17%
…of which: waiting paid+1.89%
…of which: market drift−5.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.13%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.63%
…of which: waiting paid+7.55%
…of which: market drift−6.92%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.55% + −6.92% = +0.63%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.13% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.27%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.70%
…of which: waiting paid+4.12%
…of which: market drift−0.42%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.12% + −0.42% = +3.70%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.27% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−1.27%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.18%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.50%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.82%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+4.82%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +4.82% = +4.82%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.50% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+3.69%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.55%
…of which: waiting paid+5.28%
…of which: market drift−0.74%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.28% + −0.74% = +4.55%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.69% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+0.60%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.43%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.43%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.43% = +1.43%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.60% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.72%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.06%
…of which: waiting paid+2.06%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.06% + 0.00% = +2.06%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.72% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.64%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.06%
…of which: waiting paid+8.78%
…of which: market drift−7.72%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.78% + −7.72% = +1.06%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.64% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.67%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.67%
…of which: waiting paid+2.07%
…of which: market drift−0.40%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.31%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.92%
…of which: waiting paid+10.00%
…of which: market drift−7.08%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+10.00% + −7.08% = +2.92%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.31% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.87%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.55%
…of which: waiting paid+5.70%
…of which: market drift−2.14%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.70% + −2.14% = +3.55%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.87% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.40%
…of which: waiting paid+1.02%
…of which: market drift+2.39%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.02% + +2.39% = +3.40%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.10% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.89%
…of which: waiting paid+1.81%
…of which: market drift−0.93%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.81% + −0.93% = +0.89%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.00% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.09%
…of which: waiting paid+1.94%
…of which: market drift−3.03%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.94% + −3.03% = −1.09%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.06% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.17%
…of which: waiting paid+3.17%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.17% + 0.00% = +3.17%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.96% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.04%
…of which: waiting paid+1.31%
…of which: market drift−2.35%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.31% + −2.35% = −1.04%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.20% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.11%
…of which: waiting paid+2.27%
…of which: market drift−1.16%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.27% + −1.16% = +1.11%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.40% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.49%
…of which: waiting paid+0.88%
…of which: market drift+2.61%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.88% + +2.61% = +3.49%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +4.86% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.16%
…of which: waiting paid+6.93%
…of which: market drift−9.09%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.93% + −9.09% = −2.16%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.04% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−6.18%
…of which: waiting paid+2.15%
…of which: market drift−8.33%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.15%
…of which: waiting paid+2.89%
…of which: market drift−0.74%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.89% + −0.74% = +2.15%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.73% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.57%
…of which: waiting paid+3.63%
…of which: market drift−2.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.63% + −2.07% = +1.57%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.74% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.69%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.69%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +3.69% = +3.69%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.90% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.98%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.84%
…of which: waiting paid+2.07%
…of which: market drift+0.78%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.07% + +0.78% = +2.84%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.98% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + 0.00% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.62% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.34%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.34%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.34% = +1.34%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.71% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+1.81%
…of which: market drift−1.81%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.81% + −1.81% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.92% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.98%
…of which: waiting paid+0.99%
…of which: market drift+1.99%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.99% + +1.99% = +2.98%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.29% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.52%
…of which: waiting paid+4.75%
…of which: market drift−2.23%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.45%
…of which: waiting paid+4.72%
…of which: market drift−0.26%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.72% + −0.26% = +4.45%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.90% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−0.16%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.94%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.37%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.37%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.37% = +1.37%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.81% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.65%
…of which: waiting paid+3.84%
…of which: market drift−1.19%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.84% + −1.19% = +2.65%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.30% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.65%
…of which: waiting paid+1.28%
…of which: market drift−0.63%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.28% + −0.63% = +0.65%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.86% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.22%
…of which: waiting paid+5.91%
…of which: market drift−3.69%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.91% + −3.69% = +2.22%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.67% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.08%
…of which: waiting paid+2.85%
…of which: market drift−0.76%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.85% + −0.76% = +2.08%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.86% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.08%
…of which: waiting paid+2.08%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.08% + 0.00% = +2.08%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.11% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.66%
…of which: waiting paid+5.00%
…of which: market drift−1.34%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.00% + −1.34% = +3.66%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.93% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.15%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+5.78%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−8.98%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−10.36%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−10.36%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −10.36% = −10.36%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −8.98% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.38%
…of which: waiting paid+3.48%
…of which: market drift−3.86%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.48% + −3.86% = −0.38%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.09% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.64%
…of which: waiting paid+0.22%
…of which: market drift−0.86%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.22% + −0.86% = −0.64%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.12% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.75%
…of which: waiting paid+0.73%
…of which: market drift−1.48%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.73% + −1.48% = −0.75%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.69% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.74%
…of which: waiting paid−0.85%
…of which: market drift−0.89%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (−0.85% + −0.89% = −1.74%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.28% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+0.39%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.34%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−3.63%
…of which: waiting paid+3.77%
…of which: market drift−7.40%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.16%
…of which: waiting paid+1.96%
…of which: market drift−3.12%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.96% + −3.12% = −1.16%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.25% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+2.22%
…of which: market drift−2.22%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.22% + −2.22% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.94% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−2.25%
…of which: waiting paid+7.83%
…of which: market drift−10.08%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+3.44%
…of which: market drift−3.44%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.44% + −3.44% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.48% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.02%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.02%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +2.02% = +2.02%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.96% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−2.15%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.38%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−2.38%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −2.38% = −2.38%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.15% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.81%
…of which: waiting paid+5.74%
…of which: market drift−3.93%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.74% + −3.93% = +1.81%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.21% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+5.07%
…of which: waiting paid+8.67%
…of which: market drift−3.60%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.67% + −3.60% = +5.07%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +5.13% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.13%
…of which: waiting paid+2.38%
…of which: market drift−0.25%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.09%
…of which: waiting paid+2.83%
…of which: market drift−3.92%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.83% + −3.92% = −1.09%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.58% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.20%
…of which: waiting paid+2.26%
…of which: market drift−2.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.26% + −2.07% = +0.20%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.11% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.71%
…of which: waiting paid+1.11%
…of which: market drift−1.81%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.11% + −1.81% = −0.71%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.35% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.60%
…of which: waiting paid+2.62%
…of which: market drift−3.22%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.62% + −3.22% = −0.60%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.33% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.61%
…of which: waiting paid+3.92%
…of which: market drift−6.52%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.92% + −6.52% = −2.61%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.65% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + 0.00% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.58% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.61%
…of which: waiting paid+4.05%
…of which: market drift−2.44%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.05% + −2.44% = +1.61%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.51% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.38%
…of which: waiting paid+2.65%
…of which: market drift−3.03%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.65% + −3.03% = −0.38%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.59% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.46%
…of which: waiting paid+3.44%
…of which: market drift−1.98%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.44% + −1.98% = +1.46%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.07% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.27%
…of which: waiting paid+3.59%
…of which: market drift−5.86%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.59% + −5.86% = −2.27%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.67% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.70%
…of which: waiting paid+2.65%
…of which: market drift−1.95%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.65% + −1.95% = +0.70%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.71% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.01%
…of which: waiting paid+2.07%
…of which: market drift−1.06%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.07% + −1.06% = +1.01%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.75% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.39%
…of which: waiting paid+5.29%
…of which: market drift−2.90%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.77%
…of which: waiting paid+1.21%
…of which: market drift−1.98%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.21% + −1.98% = −0.77%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.43% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+1.91%
…of which: market drift−1.91%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.91% + −1.91% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The 0.00% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+5.68%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+5.68%
…of which: waiting paid+6.23%
…of which: market drift−0.55%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+0.72%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.31%
…of which: waiting paid−1.24%
…of which: market drift+3.55%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (−1.24% + +3.55% = +2.31%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.72% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−3.78%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.27%
…of which: waiting paid+2.07%
…of which: market drift−4.34%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.07% + −4.34% = −2.27%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.78% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.10%
…of which: waiting paid+6.02%
…of which: market drift−2.92%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.02% + −2.92% = +3.10%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.25% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.07%
…of which: waiting paid+3.95%
…of which: market drift−5.01%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.95% + −5.01% = −1.07%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.68% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.28%
…of which: waiting paid+4.26%
…of which: market drift−1.98%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.26% + −1.98% = +2.28%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.58% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.06%
…of which: waiting paid+2.90%
…of which: market drift−3.96%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.90% + −3.96% = −1.06%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.83% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.92%
…of which: waiting paid+3.78%
…of which: market drift−5.70%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.78% + −5.70% = −1.92%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.85% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.34%
…of which: waiting paid+0.37%
…of which: market drift+0.97%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.37% + +0.97% = +1.34%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.41% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.37%
…of which: waiting paid+3.41%
…of which: market drift−3.03%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.41% + −3.03% = +0.37%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.14% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.03%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.03%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +3.03% = +3.03%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.35% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.39%
…of which: waiting paid+2.46%
…of which: market drift−2.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.46% + −2.07% = +0.39%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.52% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.23%
…of which: waiting paid+0.40%
…of which: market drift+0.83%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.40% + +0.83% = +1.23%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.52% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.22%
…of which: waiting paid+8.83%
…of which: market drift−8.61%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.83% + −8.61% = +0.22%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.12% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.67%
…of which: waiting paid+3.05%
…of which: market drift−2.38%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.05% + −2.38% = +0.67%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.75% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.68%
…of which: waiting paid+7.71%
…of which: market drift−8.39%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.71% + −8.39% = −0.68%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.35% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.98%
…of which: waiting paid+1.23%
…of which: market drift−0.25%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.23% + −0.25% = +0.98%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.37% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.48%
…of which: waiting paid+3.97%
…of which: market drift−3.50%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.97% + −3.50% = +0.48%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.23% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.03%
…of which: waiting paid−3.15%
…of which: market drift+5.18%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (−3.15% + +5.18% = +2.03%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.87% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.11%
…of which: waiting paid+2.16%
…of which: market drift−1.06%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.16% + −1.06% = +1.11%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.15% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.49%
…of which: waiting paid+1.98%
…of which: market drift−3.47%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.98% + −3.47% = −1.49%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.05% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.67%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.79%
…of which: waiting paid+4.64%
…of which: market drift−0.85%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.64% + −0.85% = +3.79%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.67% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.48%
…of which: waiting paid+7.11%
…of which: market drift−3.64%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.11% + −3.64% = +3.48%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.56% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.74%
…of which: waiting paid+5.52%
…of which: market drift−3.78%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.52% + −3.78% = +1.74%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.34% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+5.30%
…of which: market drift−5.30%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.30% + −5.30% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.64% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.47%
…of which: waiting paid+6.06%
…of which: market drift−4.59%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.06% + −4.59% = +1.47%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.60% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.12%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.03%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.54%
…of which: waiting paid+2.26%
…of which: market drift−0.73%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.26% + −0.73% = +1.54%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.03% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.67%
…of which: waiting paid+2.96%
…of which: market drift−4.63%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.96% + −4.63% = −1.67%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.17% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.55%
…of which: waiting paid+5.01%
…of which: market drift−2.47%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.01% + −2.47% = +2.55%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.55% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−3.21%
…of which: waiting paid+6.41%
…of which: market drift−9.62%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.41% + −9.62% = −3.21%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.74% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.87%
…of which: waiting paid+3.25%
…of which: market drift−4.13%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.25% + −4.13% = −0.87%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.02% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−1.45%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.73%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−3.85%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−3.93%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.65%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+0.99%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.58%
…of which: waiting paid+0.56%
…of which: market drift−1.15%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.56% + −1.15% = −0.58%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.99% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+1.92%
…of which: market drift−1.92%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.92% + −1.92% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The 0.00% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.43%
…of which: waiting paid+3.03%
…of which: market drift−2.61%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.03% + −2.61% = +0.43%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.66% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.02%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.02%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +2.02% = +2.02%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.98% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.05%
…of which: waiting paid+1.69%
…of which: market drift+1.36%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.69% + +1.36% = +3.05%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.17% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.89%
…of which: waiting paid+4.82%
…of which: market drift−3.93%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.82% + −3.93% = +0.89%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.38% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−3.60%
…of which: waiting paid+6.76%
…of which: market drift−10.36%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.76% + −10.36% = −3.60%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.38% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.88%
…of which: waiting paid+5.40%
…of which: market drift−2.52%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.40% + −2.52% = +2.88%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.61% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.74%
…of which: waiting paid+1.21%
…of which: market drift−1.95%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.21% + −1.95% = −0.74%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.37% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+2.56%
…of which: market drift−2.56%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.56% + −2.56% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.25% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.38%
…of which: waiting paid+0.97%
…of which: market drift−0.58%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.97% + −0.58% = +0.38%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.24% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−3.19%
…of which: waiting paid+2.33%
…of which: market drift−5.52%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.33% + −5.52% = −3.19%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.88% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.22%
…of which: waiting paid+3.06%
…of which: market drift−1.84%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−7.49%
…of which: waiting paid+7.02%
…of which: market drift−14.50%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.02% + −14.50% = −7.49%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −6.68% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + 0.00% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.16% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.86%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.72%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.72%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −0.72% = −0.72%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.64% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−3.05%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−3.05%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+4.34%
…of which: market drift−4.34%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.34% + −4.34% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.12% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.55%
…of which: waiting paid+6.19%
…of which: market drift−3.64%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.19% + −3.64% = +2.55%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.64% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.81%
…of which: waiting paid+2.66%
…of which: market drift−0.85%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.66% + −0.85% = +1.81%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.37% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.69%
…of which: waiting paid+4.13%
…of which: market drift−3.44%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.13% + −3.44% = +0.69%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.40% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.75%
…of which: waiting paid+2.39%
…of which: market drift−4.14%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.39% + −4.14% = −1.75%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.04% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.59%
…of which: waiting paid+2.65%
…of which: market drift−1.06%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.65% + −1.06% = +1.59%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.16% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.65%
…of which: waiting paid+4.58%
…of which: market drift−2.94%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.58% + −2.94% = +1.65%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.94% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.28%
…of which: waiting paid+3.79%
…of which: market drift−1.51%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.79% + −1.51% = +2.28%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.82% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.80%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+6.93%
…of which: waiting paid+6.93%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.93% + 0.00% = +6.93%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +6.07% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.44%
…of which: waiting paid+5.30%
…of which: market drift−6.74%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.30% + −6.74% = −1.44%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.61% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.07%
…of which: waiting paid+1.57%
…of which: market drift+1.50%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.57% + +1.50% = +3.07%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.07% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.09%
…of which: waiting paid+2.41%
…of which: market drift−0.32%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.41% + −0.32% = +2.09%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.15% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.55%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.55%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +3.55% = +3.55%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.39% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−0.91%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.98%
…of which: waiting paid+1.98%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.98% + 0.00% = +1.98%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.91% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.59%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.32%
…of which: waiting paid+5.02%
…of which: market drift−1.70%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.02% + −1.70% = +3.32%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.59% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+3.20%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.30%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+4.30%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +4.30% = +4.30%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.20% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.67%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.67%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.67% = +1.67%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.97% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.57%
…of which: waiting paid+2.49%
…of which: market drift−0.93%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.49% + −0.93% = +1.57%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.10% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.97%
…of which: waiting paid+6.78%
…of which: market drift−7.74%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+6.93%
…of which: waiting paid+3.33%
…of which: market drift+3.60%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.33% + +3.60% = +6.93%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +5.71% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+3.05%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.05%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.53%
…of which: waiting paid+2.38%
…of which: market drift+2.15%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.38% + +2.15% = +4.53%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.79% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+0.92%
…of which: market drift−0.92%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.92% + −0.92% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.43% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.06%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−1.06%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −1.06% = −1.06%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.29% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.57%
…of which: waiting paid+5.02%
…of which: market drift−6.58%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.02% + −6.58% = −1.57%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.12% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.39%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.34%
…of which: waiting paid+0.89%
…of which: market drift+2.45%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.89% + +2.45% = +3.34%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.39% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.30%
…of which: waiting paid+5.30%
…of which: market drift−3.01%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.30% + −3.01% = +2.30%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.06% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+0.67%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.21%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.21%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +2.21% = +2.21%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.67% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.19%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.96%
…of which: waiting paid+2.96%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.96% + 0.00% = +2.96%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +2.19% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.63%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.63%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +0.63% = +0.63%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.07% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+8.25%
…of which: waiting paid+1.69%
…of which: market drift+6.57%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.69% + +6.57% = +8.25%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +5.53% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.09%
…of which: waiting paid+4.29%
…of which: market drift−3.20%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.29% + −3.20% = +1.09%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.97% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.60%
…of which: waiting paid+8.29%
…of which: market drift−4.69%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.29% + −4.69% = +3.60%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.83% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.52%
…of which: waiting paid+1.44%
…of which: market drift+2.09%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.44% + +2.09% = +3.52%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +3.22% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+4.56%
…of which: market drift−4.56%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.56% + −4.56% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.71% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+1.89%
…of which: market drift−1.89%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.89% + −1.89% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.07% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.37%
…of which: waiting paid+1.88%
…of which: market drift−3.25%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.88% + −3.25% = −1.37%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.61% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.28%
…of which: waiting paid+4.72%
…of which: market drift−3.44%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.72% + −3.44% = +1.28%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.19% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.15%
…of which: waiting paid+3.99%
…of which: market drift−2.85%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.99% + −2.85% = +1.15%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.21% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.13%
…of which: waiting paid+3.92%
…of which: market drift−6.05%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.92% + −6.05% = −2.13%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.44% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−1.08%
…of which: waiting paid+3.69%
…of which: market drift−4.76%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.01%
…of which: waiting paid+0.95%
…of which: market drift−1.96%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.95% + −1.96% = −1.01%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.65% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.68%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+0.44%
…of which: market drift−0.44%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+0.44% + −0.44% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.15% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.78%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.59%
…of which: waiting paid+5.84%
…of which: market drift−3.25%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+0.68%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.68%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.78%
…of which: waiting paid+8.08%
…of which: market drift−5.30%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+8.08% + −5.30% = +2.78%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.20% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.10%
…of which: waiting paid+2.75%
…of which: market drift−0.65%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.75% + −0.65% = +2.10%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.90% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.23%
…of which: waiting paid+5.52%
…of which: market drift−3.29%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+5.52% + −3.29% = +2.23%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −1.05% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.07%
…of which: waiting paid+2.43%
…of which: market drift−4.49%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.43% + −4.49% = −2.07%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.32% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.55%
…of which: waiting paid+6.84%
…of which: market drift−4.29%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.84% + −4.29% = +2.55%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.29% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
de-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.78%
…of which: waiting paid+7.34%
…of which: market drift−10.11%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.34% + −10.11% = −2.78%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −3.63% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−0.73%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + 0.00% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.73% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.16%
…of which: waiting paid+4.14%
…of which: market drift−5.30%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.14% + −5.30% = −1.16%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.14% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.74%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.74%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.74% = +1.74%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.07% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.37%
…of which: waiting paid+3.25%
…of which: market drift−1.88%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.25% + −1.88% = +1.37%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.92% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+1.28%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.28%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +1.28% = +1.28%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.32% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+13.49%
…of which: market drift−13.49%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+13.49% + −13.49% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.40% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.03%
…of which: waiting paid+4.49%
…of which: market drift−1.46%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.49% + −1.46% = +3.03%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +0.89% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.38%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+3.34%
…of which: waiting paid+7.47%
…of which: market drift−4.13%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+7.47% + −4.13% = +3.34%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.38% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.55%
…of which: waiting paid+4.78%
…of which: market drift−2.22%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.78% + −2.22% = +2.55%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.54% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−2.39%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−2.38%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−2.38%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + −2.38% = −2.38%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.39% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.24%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+4.24%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +4.24% = +4.24%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.29% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.98%
…of which: waiting paid+7.61%
…of which: market drift−4.63%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid+2.52%
…of which: market drift−2.52%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+2.52% + −2.52% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.51% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−2.30%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−1.67%
…of which: waiting paid+1.54%
…of which: market drift−3.21%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.54% + −3.21% = −1.67%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.30% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.38%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.38%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +2.38% = +2.38%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.67% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.43%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.43%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +0.43% = +0.43%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.02% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+4.52%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.55%
…of which: waiting paid+3.33%
…of which: market drift+1.22%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+3.33% + +1.22% = +4.55%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +4.52% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−0.68%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.19%
…of which: waiting paid+1.46%
…of which: market drift−1.65%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+1.46% + −1.65% = −0.19%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.68% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−0.79%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+0.85%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.85%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + +0.85% = +0.85%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.79% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−2.83%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price−0.43%
…of which: waiting paid+4.71%
…of which: market drift−5.14%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+4.71% + −5.14% = −0.43%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −2.83% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−0.57%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (0.00% + 0.00% = 0.00%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The −0.57% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+1.16%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+4.55%
…of which: waiting paid+6.90%
…of which: market drift−2.35%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Why two numbers. The two legs telescope to the raw figure (+6.90% + −2.35% = +4.55%), because an opening quote for the other side was never captured and only raw prices can be chained. The +1.16% above is the de-vigged number, which strips the book’s margin off both ends. They differ by the change in that margin, and we never average them together.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−1.72%
Basisde-vigged, both sides frozen at lock
Raw close vs our price+2.41%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−1.22%
…of which: waiting paid+0.16%
…of which: market drift−1.38%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+4.03%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+4.03%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+0.69%
…of which: waiting paid+0.87%
…of which: market drift−0.18%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.60%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.60%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.54%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.54%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+0.95%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.95%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.98%
…of which: waiting paid+1.57%
…of which: market drift+0.41%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.07%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+0.60%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.60%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.45%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.45%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+4.66%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+4.66%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+0.45%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.45%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+5.21%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+5.21%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.09%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.09%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+5.44%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+5.44%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+4.53%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+4.53%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+4.53%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+4.53%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+6.78%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+6.78%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+0.98%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.98%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.63%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.63%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+5.07%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+5.07%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.73%
…of which: waiting paid+2.12%
…of which: market drift+0.60%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.07%
…of which: waiting paid+0.22%
…of which: market drift+1.85%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.78%
…of which: waiting paid+5.98%
…of which: market drift−3.21%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.04%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.04%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.93%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.93%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.91%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.91%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.60%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.60%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+5.40%
…of which: waiting paid+7.15%
…of which: market drift−1.75%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.42%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.42%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.16%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.16%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−3.33%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−3.33%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.53%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.53%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+6.10%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+6.10%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.93%
…of which: waiting paid+1.55%
…of which: market drift−2.48%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.08%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.08%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+0.93%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.93%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.92%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.92%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.42%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.42%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−3.42%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−3.42%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+3.13%
…of which: waiting paid−0.36%
…of which: market drift+3.49%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+4.88%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+4.88%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+5.73%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+5.73%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+4.23%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+4.23%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+3.79%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.79%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+3.74%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.74%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+0.74%
…of which: waiting paid+1.51%
…of which: market drift−0.77%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.47%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.47%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+0.98%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+0.98%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.74%
…of which: waiting paid+0.72%
…of which: market drift−1.46%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+4.80%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+4.80%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.70%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.70%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price0.00%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+3.06%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.06%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+4.34%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+4.34%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.02%
…of which: waiting paid+0.45%
…of which: market drift+1.58%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+3.92%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.92%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.95%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.95%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.39%
…of which: waiting paid−0.39%
…of which: market drift0.00%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+6.00%
…of which: waiting paid+8.03%
…of which: market drift−2.03%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basis
raw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.50%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.50%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+4.72%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+4.72%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+4.72%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.60%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.60%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.60%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
−1.44%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−1.44%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−1.44%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+3.49%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+3.49%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.49%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+3.50%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+3.50%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+3.50%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
+2.88%
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.88%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.88%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.94%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.94%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+1.54%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+1.54%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price−0.24%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift−0.24%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Basisraw price-to-price
Raw close vs our price+2.62%
…of which: waiting paid0.00%
…of which: market drift+2.62%
Positive means we locked a better number than the market settled at. It can be negative and it is shown when it is. Beating the close and still losing is normal, and so is winning at a worse price than the close. Never read it as a return: break-even is roughly half the hold we paid, about +2.25 points.
Every value on this card is read off one row of the MLB board. Where a field is not in the payload the card says so rather than filling it in. This row is in the CSV, unchanged.
Otto LopezOver 1.5+171 at ProphetXproj 1.9 → 5+2.30%CLV vs close✓ Won+1.71u